PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

So did anybody lodged a complaint on why £75million allowances were allowed or did United explain how that figure was reached ? I think you said £45million on covid 19 and £30million on legal fees from the sale of shares

So did United have to show the figures they made before Covid 19 on match days and losses because of Covid 19
Also, Legal fees should not be included or passed because it was a sale between the Glazers and Ratcliffe and both were rich enough to pay their legal cost
All 21/22 allowances required an audited statement to supplement the accounts. The share sale fees are presumably as with other previous applicants. I certainly raised awareness of the issue and United’s briefing of the elements didn’t seem to make much sense. But if it was audited I’m inclined to believe it was true if exaggerated within the rules
 
All 21/22 allowances required an audited statement to supplement the accounts. The share sale fees are presumably as with other previous applicants. I certainly raised awareness of the issue and United’s briefing of the elements didn’t seem to make much sense. But if it was audited I’m inclined to believe it was true if exaggerated within the rules

So why all of City accounts from 2013 that was signed off and audited in question again ?? cleared by CAS not good enough ?? Manchester City should demand all Premier League club's accounts be gone through with a fine tooth comb and not just signed off and accepted
 
So did anybody lodged a complaint on why £75million allowances were allowed or did United explain how that figure was reached ? I think you said £45million on covid 19 and £30million on legal fees from the sale of shares

So did United have to show the figures they made before Covid 19 on match days and losses because of Covid 19
Also, Legal fees should not be included or passed because it was a sale between the Glazers and Ratcliffe and both were rich enough to pay their legal cost
Having missed 80 pages.... £30 million? Is that just the club's legal fees? Not Ratcliffe's as well? So the Glazers bought the club with borrowed money that was then a debt charge on the club costing millions in interest each year, and spent £30 million (on what? trying not to sell shares to Ratcliffe?) - and it's The Blues that get the bad publicity?
 
Obviously not
Your original comment seemed to suggest the clubs put it forward and it would only be questioned in extreme circumstance. United and Chelsea figures for things seem unusual. So if they Premier League ask more questions than I am suggesting how did they get through ? Why have clubs not complained ? Seems either the premier league are either not asking the right questions full stop or are in favor of certain teams and I don’t want to go down the conspiracy route
 
So why all of City accounts from 2013 that was signed off and audited in question again ?? cleared by CAS not good enough ?? Manchester City should demand all Premier League club's accounts be gone through with a fine tooth comb and not just signed off and accepted
Because hacked emails created a case to answer
 
Yeah
@slbsn and @Prestwich_Blue are debating which hill the Premier League is standing on
maxresdefault.jpg
 
Because hacked emails created a case to answer

So United failed Uefa FFP and was fined, So will the Premier League Open up a case against United

Also, if I create a fake hacked email and state I have found United had broken the rules with the Carlos Tevez loan and 3rd party ownership and payments were made to the 3rd party, City had to buy out Carlos Tevez ownership from KIa because you are not allowed 3rd party ownership in the Premier League, West Ham was punished for that reason
so how did United get around that for 2 seasons,

 
Obviously not

So how did the Premier League let United have £40million in allowances for Covid 19
Did they really lose £40million in match revenue ?? that's over £2million a game, the maths just doesn't add up

Also, we all know about the fake attendance figures they put out compared to the official police figures
 
Clearly, United controls the Premier League and the rules, Everton and others had allowances turned down
How United £75million in allowances was passed was a joke and was not questioned or reported in the media because it was bent and rules dodged

A complicit media allows for corruption.

Silence or minor to explain Rags & Dippers & over the top crimes of the century to explain any innuendo around City.
 
So United failed Uefa FFP and was fined, So will the Premier League Open up a case against United

Also, if I create a fake hacked email and state I have found United had broken the rules with the Carlos Tevez loan and 3rd party ownership and payments were made to the 3rd party, City had to buy out Carlos Tevez ownership from KIa because you are not allowed 3rd party ownership in the Premier League, West Ham was punished for that reason
so how did United get around that for 2 seasons,


Unless the media make a song & dance about it nothing will happen.

Now imagine if Silverlake sent questions like this to the board & it got in the papers….

 
So how did the Premier League let United have £40million in allowances for Covid 19
Did they really lose £40million in match revenue ?? that's over £2million a game, the maths just doesn't add up

Also, we all know about the fake attendance figures they put out compared to the official police figures
I think United's published attendances tallied with police figures during Covid - zero at every game.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top