PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

For once City aren’t mentioned by BBC United - Mediacity.

United are though.


Interesting how they explain how the Rags missed failing PSR by providing absolutely fucking nothing in the way of detail & just repeated gobbledygook & future academy sales.

It fucking stinks!
 
Simon ‘the expert’ Jordan has heard we’re not very confident.
Slbsn has heard we are confident.
If we buy anyone in January, we’re guilty.
If we don’t buy anyone in January, we’re guilty.
We’re going to win.
We’re going to lose.
We’re going to get relegated.
We’re not going to get anything as we’re innocent.
What about the rags?
What about the Chavs?
Gary Neville and Jamie Carragher are *****
Think that’s about it.
four-tops-its-the-same-old-song.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: ufo
Interesting how they explain how the Rags missed failing PSR by providing absolutely fucking nothing in the way of detail & just repeated gobbledygook & future academy sales.

It fucking stinks!
Of course it stinks,we know what’s going on,after the results of our hearing come out,the rules and regulations will be scrapped..
 
For once City aren’t mentioned by BBC United - Mediacity.

United are though.

This line is telling
"They have also been told United are "tight" when it comes to their PSR position.
The detail of that - as with all clubs - is vague"
Why should it be vague? Why isn't it clear and transparent for all to see? Well we all know the answer to that, don't we.
 
Something doesn't sit right about no clubs failing. I can't believe this
It looks dodgy.

Everton and Forest docked.

Rags let off.

Chavs selling themselves to themselves.

The ill thought out rules to stop city have made the league look incompetent and corrupt.

Now the clubs have decided behind closed doors that it looks bad. The league has been told to not act on breaches now that it missed its only target…city.
 
Last edited:
Since we were not guilty, there was no need to cooperate with anyone.
The non-cooperation charge was nonsense.
This was totally non sensical.
Why were we found guilty of allowing a hostile prosecution body to access every detail of the clubs opperation that they wanted too, to find actual evidence of wrong doing?
Our accounts are audited by a top rated sports accountancy and services organisation so If you have issues ask questions and we will answer them (which CIty did).
The theft, proven doctoring of City emails, and the quoting of emails (totally out of context I may add) does not a guilty verdict make.
In fact, I was staggered at the time as to how poor this all was of evidence of wrong g doing was. Surely Der Spiegel should have found something a lot more substantial if we were doing things against the rules.
Basically it was a bone thrown to UEFA to say "yeah emails were stolen and some looked dodgy", so we'll give you that.
 
It’s looks dodgy.

Everton and Forest docked.

Rags let off.

Chavs selling themselves to themselves.

The ill thought out rules to stop city have made the league look incompetent and corrupt.

Now the clubs have decided behind closed doors that it looks bad. The league has been told to not act on breaches now that it missed its only target…city.
Or the clubs have complained about having to foot the legal bills in administering any sanctions, particularly after our case.
 
It’s looks dodgy.

Everton and Forest docked.

Rags let off.

Chavs selling themselves to themselves.

The ill thought out rules to stop city have made the league look incompetent and corrupt.

Now the clubs have decided behind closed doors that it looks bad. The league has been told to not act on breaches now that it missed its only target…city.
Your last paragraph is spot on mate.

It stinks that not one club has failed PSR and especially after last years shit show with clubs failing left, right and centre.

What i can see happening is us being in the clear , despite the fact we're in the clear anyway.
 
Your last paragraph is spot on mate.

It stinks that not one club has failed PSR and especially after last years shit show with clubs failing left, right and centre.

What i can see happening is us being in the clear , despite the fact we're in the clear anyway.

Is it the legal fees they are paying or paid last year fighting various cases which they only achieved one which didn’t get reversed on punishment. Add that to what they have been fighting City on two fronts with 115 and associated parties, their pot for fighting new punishments would be very small they haven’t got the stomach to start picking new fights?
 
This was totally non sensical.
Why were we found guilty of allowing a hostile prosecution body to access every detail of the clubs opperation that they wanted too, to find actual evidence of wrong doing?
Our accounts are audited by a top rated sports accountancy and services organisation so If you have issues ask questions and we will answer them (which CIty did).
The theft, proven doctoring of City emails, and the quoting of emails (totally out of context I may add) does not a guilty verdict make.
In fact, I was staggered at the time as to how poor this all was of evidence of wrong g doing was. Surely Der Spiegel should have found something a lot more substantial if we were doing things against the rules.
Basically it was a bone thrown to UEFA to say "yeah emails were stolen and some looked dodgy", so we'll give you that.
Der Spiegel is basically the German version of the Sun. Ask the dippers how much those cunts lie.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top