PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

It was followed two hours later. I contacted the club and I think they grabbed someone from Sky at the game yesterday.

It most definitely was the club pulling Sky, as they did not add in the usual caveats when Sherwood started rambling.
And the twat is back on sky today
So anything City say sky don't give a fuck
 
Thanks bud. I suppose that's the beauty of the X platform, it just lands with the right people and wider reach?

I know Soriano follows me and doesn't seem to have an issue with the stuff I post!
He wouldn’t dare mate. What dirt have you got on him? -:)

X is great creating awareness and shining a light on impropriety. It’s also nuts.
 
And the twat is back on sky today
So anything City say sky don't give a fuck
If they didn't give a fuck, they wouldn't issue an on-air apology.

The point being, they don't want to be embarrassed doing so in front of their viewers.

It also makes them more wary that City are watching and can fire a shot across their bow at any time.
 
During the UEFA charges I worked in Runcorn with a load of Liverpool fans.
For months I was getting it in the neck off them. One day they were talking about the ban and I just chirped back saying there’s a lot worse things you can do to get banned from Europe isn’t there.

Needless to say despite being factually correct it didn’t go down well at all.

Was a bit silly though, was fine to talk about city possibly being banned but not about Liverpool who actually got every English team banned.
Just like rag supporters.

So very, very good at giving it out but can't take it at all.

Immediately turn into mard arse cry babies when given some back and usually just resort to non-football related personal abuse and insults.
 
If they didn't give a fuck, they wouldn't issue an on-air apology.

The point being, they don't want to be embarrassed doing so in front of their viewers.

It also makes them more wary that City are watching and can fire a shot across their bow at any time.
A shot across their bow is something, but to stop it properly they'll need to make an example of someone in the courts.

I'd like to think that would be Jamie Carragher.
 
A shot across their bow is something, but to stop it properly they'll need to make an example of someone in the courts.

I'd like to think that would be Jamie Carragher.

We can't do that until the outcome is known. Would be stupid to seek legal recourse if a verdict then went against us.

IT WON'T, but can't be giving open goals to bottom feeders like Carragher.

If City were inclined at a later date, and I'm not sure they will be, they would go for the organisations and companies who would then continue to peddle lies.
 
We can't do that until the outcome is known. Would be stupid to seek legal recourse if a verdict then went against us.

IT WON'T, but can't be giving open goals to bottom feeders like Carragher.

If City were inclined at a later date, and I'm not sure they will be, they would go for the organisations and companies who would then continue to peddle lies.

I might be wrong, but City's handling and public comments on the APT case seem to me to have marked a change in attitude. The club seems much more combative than before.

If the '115' case has a satisfactory outcome, there'll be plenty of libellous comments from our detractors as they react. I'm also not sure that we will, but I hope in that case to see City go in hard with aggressive legal action against a couple of the worst offenders. We may not change their perception of us, but it wouldn't hurt to show those people that they need to take care in terms of how they express themselves.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top