Daily Mail, your media etc

The definition of Legacy Media? Will Uncle Rupe cut and run or die in harness leave it to a successor to issue the coup de grace?

 
bluethrunthru said:
Its people like this shit stirrer who claims to be a journalist that should be called out by actual journalist

Click to expand...

You mean the actual journalists who failed to work out there were a dozen massive grooming gangs for about two decades?
Rather have shit stirrers than journalists who follow the script. At least the shit gets stirred, and sometimes what needs to come out, comes out.
 
I'm With Stupid said:
Is that shit journalism? Or just shit reading? It literally says Pakistan on their flag.

Also it can actually be illegal to call someone racist without evidence. If they were so minded, they could sue. I remember Frankie Boyle successfully sued the Mirror for saying he was racist.
Click to expand...
Weren't we supposed to call them "Asians"?
 
Strangerepublic said:
You mean the actual journalists who failed to work out there were a dozen massive grooming gangs for about two decades?
Rather have shit stirrers than journalists who follow the script. At least the shit gets stirred, and sometimes what needs to come out, comes out.
Click to expand...

she is just a client journalist with no journalistic abilities and has / is being investigated by the Police for incitement - of course that became all about her too. If you fall for these wankers you are weak minded
 
bluethrunthru said:
she is just a client journalist with no journalistic abilities and has / is being investigated by the Police for incitement - of course that became all about her too. If you fall for these wankers you are weak minded
Click to expand...
Don't disagree with your assessment, my point is merely that when those supposed to be responsible journalists fail on their jobs, you can no longer complain when others with less integrity and capabilities fill up the space.
 
Strangerepublic said:
Don't disagree with your assessment, my point is merely that when those supposed to be responsible journalists fail on their jobs, you can no longer complain when others with less integrity and capabilities fill up the space.
Click to expand...

Oh I agree Tory K. Phillips and Burley ( thankfully gone today ) are just puppets - almost all journalists be they print or on screen are simply mouthpieces for the owners of the organs they work for - I'd exempt Victoria Derbyshire from that.
 
bluethrunthru said:
Oh I agree Tory K. Phillips and Burley ( thankfully gone today ) are just puppets - almost all journalists be they print or on screen are simply mouthpieces for the owners of the organs they work for - I'd exempt Victoria Derbyshire from that.
Click to expand...
Sorry, who’s gone today?
 
bluethrunthru said:
Kay Burley announced her shock retirement from Sky this morning
Click to expand...
Thank fuck for that. Stopped watching Sky News in the morning, mainly due to her and the influencers that now determine the content.

Thanks for the good news. Anybody know if she’s being investigated for anything ;-)
 
The Future’s Blue! said:
Thank fuck for that. Stopped watching Sky News in the morning, mainly due to her and the influencers that now determine the content.

Thanks for the good news. Anybody know if she’s being investigated for anything ;-)
Click to expand...

wait to find out who her replacement is before you jump with joy mate lol
 
Don Karleone said:
That's where most people will see the article without reading it. They know what they're doing.
Click to expand...

I doubt it. They pulled it on social media pretty quickly.

I’d agree if it was any of the right wing media more to an extent, though they wouldn’t have written the article the bbc did that was linked to in the first place.
 
meltonblue said:
I doubt it. They pulled it on social media pretty quickly.

I’d agree if it was any of the right wing media more to an extent, though they wouldn’t have written the article the bbc did that was linked to in the first place.
Click to expand...
Did the BBC really use that individual’s picture to promote the report, the pull it?

Not sure that’s an innocent mistake, unless the producer was a newby, living without world understanding.
 
The Future’s Blue! said:
Did the BBC really use that individual’s picture to promote the report, the pull it?

Not sure that’s an innocent mistake, unless the producer was a newby, living without world understanding.
Click to expand...

It’s still the main picture on the article as it’s a pic of the person they interviewed. On the article itself it has a caption under the pic saying who it is and his fear that it was a racist attack.

They pulled the social media short version of it as it clearly doesn’t depict the sentiment of the article properly or the purpose of that being the pic.

It’s naive to do on social media and like everything nowadays, some people jump on it straight away. It’s clearly a mistake though given the article itself.

Article itself here -

www.bbc.co.uk

Sweden searches for answers after country's deadliest shooting

Police say the motive of the shooter, who killed 10 people on Tuesday, remains unknown.
www.bbc.co.uk
 
This article was bought and paid for by commercial landlords - the world has changed and will constantly change - why would you live at your place of work? What happens to your family, your social life etc?

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top