PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Mad how easily gaslit some of our supporters are. No wonder opposition fans think the way they do.
This whole saga has proven what master manipulators the 21st Century media are. This endemic fickleness, which unsurprisingly abounded with the advent of social media, is fuel for their narratives. It's the reason immigrants are the root of all evil and Donald Trump can tell the truth through lies.

It's also the reason City are guilty as sin, in spite of the absence of a verdict.
 
We have been told many times that nobody knows other than the panel. All people can have is a rough idea.

With CAS City had zero idea until the ruling itself was out.

I think Slbsn has said this many many times.

City seem confident but it’s no guarantee.

People are reading too much into little things because they want to know now. Human nature.
We knew the APT case outcome nearly 3 weeks before the public.
 
Jesus wept. Wouldn't want you in the trenches with me!!
The leaks would have been everywhere for me had we been found guilty.
Stop fucking worrying. What will be will be.

Best comment is what will be, will be…

Some people will have worried about these for years for no point.

Others not and could worry about it when it happens.

Overwhelmingly, the starting point will be not guilty, as it is more probable we didn’t do what was accused.

However 12 weeks, the PL have not turned up with no evidence, so there must be some questions to answer.

The judgment will be fascinating, but most won’t read it.

Be good to have sorted by end of Feb.

I’m expecting not guilty.
 
He used the word "sentence" previously when he clearly meant judgment. Plus he will know whatever the verdict from the liability hearing, sanctioning would come later (if The Lawyer is correct and they usually are). If anything, the way he said he would have his say, suggested confidence.
Could you explain what a liability hearing is pls mate?
 
I was gonna say but the loser would need to have a legal basis to appeal but we’ve seen with the Leicester case the PL will appeal regardless and the Red Cartel will want to drag this out.

Depends if Masters is still in position after the verdict from the liability hearing.
 
Could you explain what a liability hearing is pls mate?
It has been reported that the hearing was split as to establish any liability City had ie if they had actually breached any rules and then, if and once established, the parties will come back and make their submissions on what appropriate sanctions should be. In other words, as of now, if The Lawyer is correct nobody has even discussed what the appropriate sanction should be because that will come only if City are liable.
 
It has been reported that the hearing was split as to establish any liability City had ie if they had actually breached any rules and then, if and once established, the parties will come back and make their submissions on what appropriate sanctions should be. In other words, as of now, if The Lawyer is correct nobody has even discussed what the appropriate sanction should be because that will come only if City are liable.
That doesn’t sound too good.
 
Unless City are only liable for minor charges like non co-operation... in which case the club would therefore already know this
Hope so & we should be able to demonstrate why we maybe didn’t cooperate- leaks being one reason & revealing our business plans to rivals, being another.
 
If he does know … “In one month I think there will be a verdict and a sentence

Very few are changing their mind on our guilt whatever the verdict so if anyone currently thinks we guilty that word is getting seized upon.
Pep seems to misunderstand the legal system. It is not a criminal court so there is no “verdict” and no “sentence.”
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top