PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Chris in London said:
It’s an independent panel, not a PL committee.

For MCFC to be charged with not disclosing the contract between Mancini and Al Jazeera makes no sense unless you first prove that it wasn’t a genuine contract between RM and AJ in the first place.

I struggle to see how they can do that if the panel doesn’t even hear evidence from RM.

Or AJ.
Click to expand...

The PL also seem to forget what the actual rules were at the time. The manager contract rules were a lot more vague back then. I could actually see various charges falling due to similar across the board.
 
Charlie Vietch is a leach. I watched him for a while until I realised the shit he is actually doing. I don't like watching homeless, druggies being exploited for clicks. And the taxpayer pays for those police that have to turn up to sort out the trouble he attracts and creates.

He just one of those people that life/ humanity would be better without.

His fans love him, they love that exploitative shit.
 
He's an arse hole veitch just like those other divvies that film around people's place of work then auditors looking for a reaction
He acts the tough guy he shit himself when a few youngsters chased him in to a shopping centre he's a low life but people like him and that's what he wants makes a living off it the arsehole
 
pudge said:
As much as I believe we will clear our name, do you mean from the point of after the hearing?

Because I don't think the money spent from either side on legal fees is window dressing
Click to expand...
I can’t imagine the PL are too bothered about the legal fees given it’s the clubs that will be picking up the tab - although I imagine the clubs are getting a bit pissed off with the PL spunking away their money with all the cases the PL keep losing for not knowing their own rules
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top