PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

I suggest you look at the league table.
I was responding to the point about workrate and physical intensity. Not comparing all aspects of City to Brentford, Villa etc. Clearly there's more to football than physicality but this City team used to excel in that respect. Not any more.
 
What have any of these post-match comments got to do with the PL charging us? Isn't here is a separate thread for analysing games? Or is it a deliberate strategy to reach 10,000 on the PL topic?
Most of the comments in this topic are frivolous
 
He doesn’t claim to be an itk. He just a fellow fan that knows our history and knows our rivals history and defends us well in online fan on fan videos. Balanced and bold. Imo
What’s he said on this topic tho couldn’t find anything
 
Let's not turn into rags.
Forest have won 2 European cups..and as it stands now.
With tge squad they have..you have to give them credit.
They stopped us playing.
Played to a game plan .got 3 points..and sit 3rd in the league.
How’s is being critical of a teams tactics becoming rags
I’ve no idea of why two European Cups in 79 & 80 have any relevance to a game played 44 years later
Yeah they had a plan and it worked I just wouldn’t want my team to have the lowest processions stats in the PL
 
How’s is being critical of a teams tactics becoming rags
I’ve no idea of why two European Cups in 79 & 80 have any relevance to a game played 44 years later
Yeah they had a plan and it worked I just wouldn’t want my team to have the lowest processions stats in the PL
You pissed? Fuck off to the post game thread.

Waiting for us to be buggered, here!
 
With how this season is going ( Injuries of Rodri, Bobb...etc , Personal problems of Pep...the unbelievable bad luck in games from Feynoord to United to Madrid) its easy to predict the end of this horror show.
 
With how this season is going ( Injuries of Rodri, Bobb...etc , Personal problems of Pep...the unbelievable bad luck in games from Feynoord to United to Madrid) its easy to predict the end of this horror show.
Thought we was relatively lucky not to be beaten by more goals against madrid tbh, especially the home leg.
 
With how this season is going ( Injuries of Rodri, Bobb...etc , Personal problems of Pep...the unbelievable bad luck in games from Feynoord to United to Madrid) its easy to predict the end of this horror show.
those games weren't bad luck mate but that is for another thread
 
With how this season is going ( Injuries of Rodri, Bobb...etc , Personal problems of Pep...the unbelievable bad luck in games from Feynoord to United to Madrid) its easy to predict the end of this horror show.
Is it? Given that, why don’t you predict precisely what the outcome is going to be, as your post conspicuously does not.
 
But you get the general feeling?
Not really no. They’ve said it’s easy to predict the outcome without providing any particulars whatsoever. They could be predicting any number of potential outcomes.

What do you think they meant? And what correlation does that have to the examples that were provided?
 
Like you said, harmless fun. There’s no need to get worked up over it, bluemoon used to be an unserious place with loads of funny posters. Now it’s full of unfunny fuckers that take life (a foootball forum) seriously.

Keep doing what you do Tolmie.

Sure, but a few posters get genuinely quite offended and angry if you say that Tolmie doesn't have any info. It's a have cake/eat too situation.

This thread is a good example - a lot of people have come to his defence, and from everything we hear he's a genuinely good guy in real life so I can understand that.

But their defences are split. Half are saying that his posts are harmless fun and shouldn't be taken seriously, and half are saying that his posts are genuine info he is passing on in good faith. If we all committed to the 'he's just trying to entertain us and we shouldn't take his posts as any indication of any real news' then it'd be no problem.
 
Not really no. They’ve said it’s easy to predict the outcome without providing any particulars whatsoever. They could be predicting any number of potential outcomes.

What do you think they meant? And what correlation does that have to the examples that were provided?
He wasn't talking specifics, he was intimating in the context of the sesson, but I know you're a details kinda guy.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top