Oh I get that but if I'm getting that money I'm drawing things out for as long as I can
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
I think when you’re getting that money you’re good enough to know you don’t need to.Oh I get that but if I'm getting that money I'm drawing things out for as long as I can
tregyblue61
Well-Known Member
Was just passing and saw the door ajar. popped me head in to have a look. Couldn't see anything going on. maybe try again tomorrow.
=:-(
=:-(
Was just passing and saw the door ajar. popped me head in to have a look. Couldn't see anything going on. maybe try again tomorrow.
=:-(
Mayor West
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Dec 2008
- Messages
- 10,336
So tomorrow is the day then lads is it?
I'm not sure if breaking Premier League rules will disqualify you as a director, and I doubt the government has the guts to do that to Khaldoon. If a scapegoat is needed, I assume Simon Pearce will be promoted.
They aren't just accused of breaking PL rules mate, they're accused of financial fraud. They would 100% be liable to be disqualified if charges are proven.
It would be hard to think of a more serious allegation towards a company's board then what the PL are accusing ours of.
Stoned Rose
Well-Known Member
You might be right and the thought certainly crossed my mind.There’s no way Pep meant “sentence” as we understand it - as that implies we have already been found guilty.
It’s obvious that he meant the “decision”
Or “outcome”
But there is no way any of us KNOW that.
Stoned Rose
Well-Known Member
I agree he probably didn’t mean that.well, personally I don’t think he meant sentencing as that would mean he believes the club will be sentenced. By all means believe that, I don’t.
But there is no way you, or anyone else, KNOW that, so it’s unhelpful to suggest you do.
Bournemouth Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Mar 2015
- Messages
- 3,229
It will be one daySo tomorrow is the day then lads is it?
Saddleworth2
Well-Known Member
No. If we haven't even got the judgement yet then there is little chance.So tomorrow is the day then lads is it?
If they have done what they are accused of theres every possibility of criminal charges you would thinkThey aren't just accused of breaking PL rules mate, they're accused of financial fraud. They would 100% be liable to be disqualified if charges are proven.
It would be hard to think of a more serious allegation towards a company's board then what the PL are accusing ours of.
remember arthur mann
Well-Known Member
Blimey. That looks like Oldham councils environmental health office.
Marvin.
Well-Known Member
I would want to see the evidenceIf they have done what they are accused of theres every possibility of criminal charges you would think
heslops barnet
Well-Known Member
Another check in…….fuck all news again
And this is why i remain unconcerned, when hmrc raid the offices I'll start to worryI would want to see the evidence
Master-Lotus
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 8 Sep 2022
- Messages
- 489
Agreed. There's always a language barrier with Pep whenever he speaks English.
i kne albert davy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 12,144
What inflating income to pay more tax ?If they have done what they are accused of theres every possibility of criminal charges you would think
Agree, Cole Palmer was not the same ‘Cole Palmer’ that Chelsea have. Alvarez and Mahrez didn’t have a tackle between them. Pep rested the whole midfield and the rags just found lots of space and a lack of resistance that wasn’t there before those subs.Mate, that’s a bunch of first teamers replaced by reserves, whichever way you look at it. I do agree though, that if it had been at a different time of the Season, we would have bettered the 6-1.
It was worth it for that night in Istanbul though.
wolviedinho
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 23,921
- Location
- Doublethink
- Team supported
- Super City from Maine Road(not wolves)
Pep knows I am convinced 115 %.Agreed. There's always a language barrier with Pep whenever he speaks English.
I know it goes against the legal/rationale/leak tide.
His body language recently is as good as read as any online indicator or leak from a high placed club source. The man get his info direct from khaldoon.
So I wouldn’t be surprised if the top brass at city don’t know but pep does. His mate ain’t gonna to do him like this.
Khaldoon doesn’t seem the type to fuck pep over. If anyone can contradict that with evidence, go ahead.
Im convinced pep and khaldoon know what way the wind is blowing. Official channels can stay quiet but people talk and a top KC will be no different. How else do we pay them off the books?-:)
The online personalities can say what they want but it don’t mean they are correct.
You might be right and the thought certainly crossed my mind.
But there is no way any of us KNOW that.
You’re really splitting hairs. We’re talking about a word - “sentence” - our foreign manager used which would imply that we’ve been found guilty & are just waiting for the sentence/punishment.
You have to take into account the way Pep talks & his grasp of our language then consider his demeanour & he doesn’t look as if he KNOWS we’re about to be punished. But he is suggesting we’ll find out the outcome soon.
Of course we don’t KNOW but it’s reasonable to make an educated intelligent summation of what Pep meant.
But nobody KNOWS the outcome at the moment - although I imagine Khaldoon has been thoroughly briefed by Pannick & the club is continuing to do its business as normal - which MIGHT be a good sign.
Can we just be positive & hope it’s a good sign - as we’ve nothing else to go on