PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Dribble said:
Both the PL & City wanted to keep details of the hearings private, but the courts ruled otherwise.

It maybe frustrating not getting daily blow by blow accounts of what's taking place, but City will have their reasons for favouring privacy & to be honest, if it were up to me I'd probably do the same.

Trust City & Trust the process. Our boys are professionals who know what they're doing & why. )(
Click to expand...
When city and the PL wanted it to be kept private, who was the opposition in court that was pushing for it to be made public?
 
jrb said:
Going back to CAS. One of the 3 Judges found City guilty. Was there a reason or reasons published for that decision?
Click to expand...
I believe the reason was something to do with that shameless jerkoff 3rd judge being appointed by UEFA...
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
It’s very much an ex tempore, in vino, statement, but here goes:

“Manchester City have carefully noted recent developments around Premier League financial regulations and share concerns about the length of time it is taking for its innocence to be demonstrated. Whilst the club voted against these regulations before they were implemented, it has complied with them since, which is why it has strenuously denied these allegations throughout this process, and has provided overwhelming evidence to support this. The club has yet to see any evidence that supports these allegations.

Manchester City have been fully cooperating in relation to these charges, and remain confident that the club will be fully exonerated around compliance with its financial obligations to the Premier League.

The club nonetheless supports the principle that the rules that govern finances within the most commercially successful sporting competition on the planet are fair, transparent and sustainable - and welcome the opportunity to work with the rest of the league to achieve that.“
Click to expand...
More than a hint of starting a running commentary, which both parties have refrained from to date.
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
How can you say nothing has changed? In over a year? Loads has changed.
Click to expand...
Nothing has changed in regards to Citys' position in this whole farago
The club are maintaining radio silence for the moment, rightly so because the know nowts in the background will pick up on any throwaway comment and likely use such comment in an attempt to further blacken our name.
City are confident that they will win and that will do for me.
 
Simon Jordan is full of shit , he keeps on repeating that we got off with the UEFA charges at CAS because some charges were time barred , which is a load of bollocks , these time barred issued were never tried or judged. If they were we would have defended the charges that were time barred but we didnt get the opportunity to prove our innocence
In Jordan's simple little world because charges were time barred we were guilty, he is thick as pig shit , he uses big words to make himself look intelligent and knowledgable , he is just a nonce with a 1990's hair style playing to the Rag/Dipper audience Takshite crave , he is a fucking moron along with his side kick Jim "Billy liar" White who used to talk into his mobile phone on transfer deadline day when there was no one on the other end of the phone , claiming he had breaking news from his "source" he is a f*cking fraud as well , Jordan and White are the perfect partnership , two cheeks of the same arse.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.