if they were negligent then yesIs every parent that has a child kidnapped or murdered culpable?
if they were negligent then yesIs every parent that has a child kidnapped or murdered culpable?
Exactly right. If you do all you can to protect your kids but something still happens, you have done your bit.I guess their eternal punishment is why did we do that. It was their decision to leave them alone and they no doubt regret it.
I'm just a plasterer.Please explain the cadaver dog investigation results.
They identified blood in the apartment and blood and a body in the McCann's hire car.I'm just a plasterer.
But assuming those dogs 100% correctly identified a dead body was in that apartment. How does that prove the parents had anything to do with it? We know she was taken from there, but we don't now anything else.
In the bluemoon court that would nearly all of them culpable thenif they were negligent then yes
The hire car they didn't have on the night in question?They identified blood in the apartment and blood and a body in the McCann's hire car.
Have you discussed it with them?They identified blood in the apartment and blood and a body in the McCann's hire car.
Which shit website did you get that from?They identified blood in the apartment and blood and a body in the McCann's hire car.
Maybe he’s a dog whisperer.Which shit website did you get that from?
Common knowledge that the Portuguese police brought these specialists dogs soon after her disappearance, and that is what they identified. You can check it out, it's public record.Which shit website did you get that from?
How do you know that was what they identified?Common knowledge that the Portuguese police brought these specialists dogs soon after her disappearance, and that is what they identified.
These dogs are specially trained to identify the scent of a dead body and also blood. Just like drug dogs are trained to detect drugs. They aren't 100% accurate but very close.How do you know that was what they identified?
I have heard of them, although I’m no expert.These dogs are specially trained to identify the scrent of a dead body and also blood. Just like drug dogs are trained to detect drugs. They aren't 100% accurate but very close.
I'm genuinely surprised you and others on here haven't heard about them.
I'm not relying on anything, I just asked someone how they explained the multiple times two separate dogs identified blood and body scent in relation to her dissaparance. I know it's not admissible.I have heard of them, although I’m no expert.
What I think I can lay claim to, however, is an ability to evaluate evidence, and some dogs going apeshit, without any meaningful corroborating evidence has no probative value whatsoever. You are relying upon worthless evidence to support your theories.
Its admissibility isn’t the issue, so much as its lack of probative value even if it was admissible.I'm not relying on anything, I just asked someone how they explained the multiple times two separate dogs identified blood and body scent in relation to her dissaparance. I know it's not admissible.
As far as I can see no one in relation to the actual case and certainly no one on here has been able to explain those results. By the way, the McCanns offered no explanation.
No one knows what happened to the poor little girl. What I do know is the McCanns are culpable in her dissaperance.
You’d be a touch unfortunate would you not, if both your rental car and apartment had had a dead body in them just before you turned up on holiday?The dog stuff could be easily argued against and proves nothing. It was a rental car, anything could have happened in there by different people over the age of the car. It was also a rental appartment which again anything could have happened in there as well. It's almost not even worth mentioning