PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

It's one of Blue Anon's weirder adamant conspiracies that "Magic Hat" and Nick Harris are the exact same person. Always have different styles from my perspective, though they've both gone a bit mad with their conspiracies in the other direction. The whole case is a fascinating study in social psychology on how fandom (insider/outsider groups), the internet, conspiracy theorising and complex legal/business secrecy works to bring out the worst in everyone imo.

I don’t think it could possibly be more obvious that they’re the same person.
 
I must have missed the posts that weren't just guesses, no one knows anything
i wasnt limiting it to knowing about the case, i was being general but even if you just confine it to the case, anybody who has read this thread will have massively more understanding of it than that halfwit could ever hope to have.
 
I've heard Aldridge is a thick-as-mince pisshead.

I'm more likely to be right than him.
My Shih Tzu is more likely to be right than him although to be fair to Aldo, he is a particularly clever little Shih Tzu. He likes to 'talk' (not bark) to people in the park who fuss him, he probably sounds similar to Aldo, now I think of it after he's been tossed out of the wine bar (Aldo, not my dog, he's teetotal).
 

Is it to do with this?
I can't make the sozzled scouse gobshite out in this article.
That article is a template for what will be written when we are cleared of the substantive charges if the club continues with its effete approach to the media. It’s replete with lies, misrepresentations and innuendo.

I hope the club gets a fucking backbone to deal with shit like this when the verdict lands, although I’m not holding my breath.
 
He didnt say that. Quite the opposite. He's a total dick but he was speculating on why we had spent big already and said it was either because we were worried about a transfer ban or, because we knew we were going to win the case and were investing in rebuilding to dominate again in future years. He also said that he couldn't believe that Pep would have signed an extension unless he, and city believed they had won the case.
He also used the word pre-emptive, which leads me to believe he didn't write the article.
 
That article is a template for what will be written when we are cleared of the substantive charges if the club continues with its effete approach to the media. It’s replete with lies, misrepresentations and innuendo.

I hope the club gets a fucking backbone to deal with shit like this when the verdict lands, although I’m not holding my breath.

Could you imagine the person who reads that and comes to the conclusion that they have learnt something new with Aldridge’s insightful expertise on this matter.

The crying about City’s ability to spend what they want is hilarious and shows zero self awareness as to how he managed to get his brief spell at Liverpool and the conditions of 18 of Liverpool’s 20 league titles were won in a period where they could spend what they want and buy what ever player they wanted.
 
That article is a template for what will be written when we are cleared of the substantive charges if the club continues with its effete approach to the media. It’s replete with lies, misrepresentations and innuendo.

I hope the club gets a fucking backbone to deal with shit like this when the verdict lands, although I’m not holding my breath.
All I've ever wanted khaldoon to do is to hang these cunts out to dry and absolutely pulverise them but the professional and the gent that he is i would hazard a guess he couldn't give two fucks about a nimrod like Aldridge and the other shithouses.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top