Bodicoteblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 5,859
Fascinated to see how we will be blamed for the PLs incompetence in writing their own rules.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Baldwin’s Casuals.Is there anybody you haven’t fucking worked for?
Been out with a load of scousers from work tonight.. mix of red and blue.. and being fair the more rational variety
Their opinion is that there’s too many ‘charges’ for something not to stick. We’ll get done for something leaning towards the more minor charges but it will be no more than a fine or maybe a transfer ban for 1 or 2 windows
Their opinion is that there’s too many ‘charges’ for something not to stick. We’ll get done for something leaning towards the more minor charges but it will be no more than a fine or maybe a transfer ban for 1 or 2 windows
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
The rags.Is there anybody you haven’t fucking worked for?
horlock_was_super
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 8 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 3,428
- Location
- In complete despair at 93:19
- Team supported
- Manchester City F.C.
Underworld?Baldwin’s Casuals.
That is a double edged sword tho, there is the one way of thinking that your friends have and i can see the rationale behind that but there is also the flip side of the coin where you ever egg the pudding to the extent where you spread yourself so thinly over so many charges that it calls into question the veracity of any of the charges it just depends on what you want to believe.Been out with a load of scousers from work tonight.. mix of red and blue.. and being fair the more rational variety
Their opinion is that there’s too many ‘charges’ for something not to stick. We’ll get done for something leaning towards the more minor charges but it will be no more than a fine or maybe a transfer ban for 1 or 2 windows
Personally i will go with what i have always believed is that the pl knew fine well they had scant hope of making this stick and they hoped we would cut a deal when we didnt they went down plan b which was a plan to tarnish the club either way because as we all know its around 6 charges but multiple counts of each but 6 charges doesnt play well in the media but 115 charges plays fantastically just like winning the title 3 times on the spin is nice but 4 on the spin has alot more punch as with most things these days its all about optics, reality takes a backseat.
Arent you an accountant? Technically youve never ' worked' for anyone ;)The rags.
manimanc
Well-Known Member
We'll get done for fuckall mate as we haven't done anything wrong apart from run a club to the best of it's abilities.Been out with a load of scousers from work tonight.. mix of red and blue.. and being fair the more rational variety
Their opinion is that there’s too many ‘charges’ for something not to stick. We’ll get done for something leaning towards the more minor charges but it will be no more than a fine or maybe a transfer ban for 1 or 2 windows
First mistake was being friendrg with scousers?We'll get done for fuckall mate as we haven't done anything wrong apart from run a club to the best of it's abilities.
MMA
Well-Known Member
Get your seagull hanging from the rafters , inflated bananasHas there been any updates today?
and your old laser blue kappa kit ready.
Keegan is coming back and you might spot Bernardo and Kevin getting pissed in town.
We're going to the second division.
Happy days.