PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Is it correct that payments received by EFL clubs from the PL in recent years are of diminished amounts because of the costs the PL have had to incur bringing this case?

If so, it wasn’t something of which I was aware, but talking to a couple of Preston supporters recently they seemed convinced it was.
 
Is it correct that payments received by EFL clubs from the PL in recent years are of diminished amounts because of the costs the PL have had to incur bringing this case?

If so, it wasn’t something of which I was aware, but talking to a couple of Preston supporters recently they seemed convinced it was.

The money being spent by the PL to fight this is reducing amounts going to its stakeholders in the Premier League. So I imagine this will be reducing the trickle down effect to The Football League. Didn’t Masters and Parry get their collars felt by a commons select committee quizzing them why money wasn’t going down the football pyramid from the PL?
 
The panel think they are rushing along. The blue observer thinks they are grindingly slow. QED.
I think what old Albert was trying to say is this...If you are out and about, getting on with things, enjoying yourself then time passes more quickly than if you're just sat in front of a screen with your thumb up your arse.
 
The money being spent by the PL to fight this is reducing amounts going to its stakeholders in the Premier League. So I imagine this will be reducing the trickle down effect to The Football League. Didn’t Masters and Parry get their collars felt by a commons select committee quizzing them why money wasn’t going down the football pyramid from the PL?
Tbh, when they raised it, I just assumed those payments were fixed amounts, ring-fenced etc, and that it would only be monies with the PL that might be affected.

If so, it’s a reason why half the EPL supporters probably are unhappy with us, whilst the other half are (and should be) furious with the PL for bringing forth this whole charade in the first place. Needless to say, this was what I pointed out to these PNE lads.
 
In the Special Theory of Relativity, Einstein determined that time is relative—in other words, the rate at which time passes depends on your frame of reference
He famously came up with that theory when he was sat in his office in the Zurich Patent Office on a miserable, wet Tuesday afternoon wondering why the weekend had gone so quickly while Monday and Tuesday morning seemed to last forever.
 
So according to Stefan's substack we are not getting even the initial liability decision until 2026 and possibly until the end of the season? I was led to believe this was an imminent, few weeks left type deal
Ahh for fuck sake.
It never ends. I thought it might be before the start of the season.

The bastards PL must love this, Masters gets to stay in his job a little longer and the cloud over us is still there, with nobs like piss head and Ian Rush tribute act John Aldridge taking pot shots at us.

On the bright side least we get to see the new signings tomorrow.
 
Is it correct that payments received by EFL clubs from the PL in recent years are of diminished amounts because of the costs the PL have had to incur bringing this case?

If so, it wasn’t something of which I was aware, but talking to a couple of Preston supporters recently they seemed convinced it was.
That is a narrative worth developing. To me the football authorities have spent six years now searching for a smoking gun and found nothing. Clearly this is no longer, if it ever was, an issue of justice and fair play, but is now a fully fledged political witch-hunt. The phrase justice delayed is justice denied springs to mind.
 
tbf, I’m not sure it was all of those 18 titles as they won a few before the Littlewood’s money landed in the ‘60s, but I completely take your point.
Their first few titles were bankrolled by their founder John Houlding who also gave them a free stadium.
The original sugar daddy club.
 
I remember, in the past when we were seeing records broken and amazing title runs, we had just won something major.... Out of the blue one of the main reporters suddenly asking about potential PL charges (this was maybe a year and a half before they dropped).

There wasn't a general feeling that charges would be brought, in fact we thought it was ridiculous that they would try the same thing as UEFA.. it wasn't at all in the horizon but there was this ONE reporter highlighting it.

It convinced me there was a media campaign bubbling and chipping away in the background. Some reporters had seemingly made this their campaign.

Someone somewhere is tapping up reporters against City.
It wasn't difficult to work out.

Allegations were made in the New York Times who at the time were part owned by FSG.
 
That is a narrative worth developing. To me the football authorities have spent six years now searching for a smoking gun and found nothing. Clearly this is no longer, if it ever was, an issue of justice and fair play, but is now a fully fledged political witch-hunt. The phrase justice delayed is justice denied springs to mind.
Shouldn’t the whole of the EFL be furious with the PL (and a few clubs within the PL let’s be honest)?
Anything to say Rick Parry?
 
Shouldn’t the whole of the EFL be furious with the PL (and a few clubs within the PL let’s be honest)?
Anything to say Rick Parry?
He's still a fully paid up Dipper, as well as their number one fan which trumps everything else.
 
Last edited:
He's still a fully paid up Dipper as well as their number one fans which trumps everything else.
They've all been paid off in various ways to vote illegal stuff through at rule change meetings.

City don't give them anything.

I suppose as long as their share of legal costs is less than the PL donation they are happy.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top