york away to this!
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 11,062
Bollocks.Fray Bentos
Or is that back to the corned beef debate?...
Bollocks.Fray Bentos
I thought you were referring to which "prime cuts" were in their pies !!Bollocks.
Or is that back to the corned beef debate?...
Exactly my point! ;-)I thought you were referring to which "prime cuts" were in their pies !!
hi DuffyFray Bentos
I wish I was there ; )hi Duffy
to the regiment
I thought you were referring to which "prime cuts" were in their pies !!
View attachment 160879
Now, there are many parallels to be drawn from religion vs aethiest in this thread.
The premier league are claiming that we are guilty of something.
We say "prove it" and 5000 x 20 posts later here we are talking about corned beef and religion.
If you remove the legalities and rulings, it is exactly the same.
Religion claims to be something. Sceptics ask for proof of this claim. But no proof comes. Because it is unprovable, as well as highly improbable.
BTW, the only reason there will be a provable outcome in City's case is because there is evidence.
Religion claiming to be in authority because of something that makes them 'feel funny inside' is just not going to cut it.
So, if I may.... it is not the bleeding same.
Cheers.
Anyone who agrees with me can put cash in the collection box on the way out. I can also dunk your kid's head in a sink for an extra tenner.
Also calling @Boris Yeltsin to the thread (although, I'm sure he doesn't need electronic thingymebobs for this, the 'big man' will just tap him on the shoulder and send him my way).
u and ur are not words.U literally keep proving my point, u say people talk bout religion and sceptics ask for proof but religious people cant provide it because it is unproveable by the exact same token a sceptic could be asked to prove their assertion that all religion was false and once again couldnt prove it because once again it is unproveable, both arguments are exactly the same just different perceptions and viewpoints but good try.
With regards to ur balance of probabilities it is the same probability either way that their is something in it or nothing at all depending on ur viewpoint and perception and both are unproveable.
Once again thanks for entirely making my point for me, well done.
Anybody remember Ellis' pies?Hollands.
Talking to AI robots now
They had a factory down the road from me in Gorton,closed in the 70s.Anybody remember Ellis' pies?
Want to see mental illness playing out in real time?
The Magic Twat first asks GroK, the AI feature on Musk’s Nazi app X, to basically agree with him that Citeh are dirty cheats
But when he doesn’t get the answer he wants, he then gets in a lengthy argument. With a bot
Beyond parody
I went there too. 20 yrs earlier thoughI went to Christ The King in Newton Heath (Catholic school). We got taken to City during the 80's. We never got given tickets for United.
Just like religious Johnny's do, you are reading one definition of a multifaceted term to defend an entrenched position.Heretics are religious too. Faith comes in many forms. Same psychological process applies.
Such a smart, clever and genuinely funny guy.
Sorrow, for me.
Sorrow, for me.
I would imagine with Rankin Roger these days...With Gill and Parry?