PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

If there was irrefutable evidence then you would expect the PL legal team to advise the PL to save its money. I’m not even sure it’s possible to have irrefutable evidence for all of the charges. Okay the Mancini thing might be a sworn statement by the key individuals and copies of bank statements but even then the PL might suggest off-book arrangements. How do you prove that hasn’t occurred. Luckily the legal system will be concentrating on the likelihood of this happening and will demand evidence from the PL which is equally likely to not be irrefutable evidence.
Luckily we don’t need to. They need to prove it did.
Bit like God…
 

2h
·
Shared with Your friends
Friends




May be an image of text



https://www.facebook.com/stories/10...Hf-spqT6WA7j_OoS_e8TyRX3sVf8Q&__tn__=<<,P-y-R

 
When did this thread get infested with effete southern jessies talking about fancy ways of cooking potatoes?

The only way to eat them is as mash, chips or roasties. Now fuck off with your Boulangere, Fondant, Hasselback shite.
crisps muppet you forget about crisps
 
When did this thread get infested with effete southern jessies talking about fancy ways of cooking potatoes?

The only way to eat them is as mash, chips or roasties. Now fuck off with your Boulangere, Fondant, Hasselback shite.
what about wedgies in the air fryer?

loads of cajun seasoning to give them a kick.

the missus is indian so this provides chips for me and spice for her. or is there to be no middle ground?
 
If there was irrefutable evidence then you would expect the PL legal team to advise the PL to save its money. I’m not even sure it’s possible to have irrefutable evidence for all of the charges. Okay the Mancini thing might be a sworn statement by the key individuals and copies of bank statements but even then the PL might suggest off-book arrangements. How do you prove that hasn’t occurred. Luckily the legal system will be concentrating on the likelihood of this happening and will demand evidence from the PL which is equally likely to not be irrefutable evidence.

City don't have to prove it didn't occur, the PL have to prove it DID occur
 
When did this thread get infested with effete southern jessies talking about fancy ways of cooking potatoes?

The only way to eat them is as mash, chips or roasties. Now fuck off with your Boulangere, Fondant, Hasselback shite.
Baked! and Potato Farls (Slim or Tattie Scones for our Scots contingent) with a fry up!
 
If there was irrefutable evidence then you would expect the PL legal team to advise the PL to save its money. I’m not even sure it’s possible to have irrefutable evidence for all of the charges. Okay the Mancini thing might be a sworn statement by the key individuals and copies of bank statements but even then the PL might suggest off-book arrangements. How do you prove that hasn’t occurred. Luckily the legal system will be concentrating on the likelihood of this happening and will demand evidence from the PL which is equally likely to not be irrefutable evidence.

Don’t be shocked if it comes out the premier league lawyers did advise the PL to save its money. They’ve ignored good legal advice on many occasions to their cost.
 
City don't have to prove it didn't occur, the PL have to prove it DID occur
Yes which is exactly my point. This irrefutable evidence, based on what we said in our first press release, that Jordan seems to think we have that could have stopped all these shenanigans was the reason for my initial comment. People are thinking we have something like that but I always took it to mean the club are just confident they can demonstrate that the accusations did not occur ONCE legal proceedings commenced. You’re just not going to give your accuser further information until they’ve given you all their accusations and THEIR evidence.
 
If there was irrefutable evidence then you would expect the PL legal team to advise the PL to save its money. I’m not even sure it’s possible to have irrefutable evidence for all of the charges. Okay the Mancini thing might be a sworn statement by the key individuals and copies of bank statements but even then the PL might suggest off-book arrangements. How do you prove that hasn’t occurred. Luckily the legal system will be concentrating on the likelihood of this happening and will demand evidence from the PL which is equally likely to not be irrefutable evidence.
The club doesn't have to prove that there were no "off book arrangements". It is the PL that has to prove there were.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top