PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Metal Biker]

He's saying not because he's been legally threatened. That's different to saying he's been legally threatened.

If you offered me ten pence and I refused saying "not because I'm a millionaire already, I just don't want your ten pence", is not me saying I'm a millionaire already.

 

[cheekybids]

We are going to get penalised for non co-operation , its the only thing the Premier league have to save face , we have been accused of fraud on a grand scale involving multi-national companies , these companies will not open their accounts for the Premier to peruse , it will never happen.
So the fact the Premier league cannot retrieve the information they need the non co-operation is the only stick to beat us with , Masters and his cohorts have no juristricition outside the football world they are not the law and they will look like fools at the conclusion of this witch hunt.
We will get a hefty fine similar to the CAS verdict which will give the ammuntion for pundits to state we must have done something wrong , which was basically the same premise the media used with the UEFA charges
We keep out titles , cups , records , manager , players , was looking forward to a trip to Haig Avenue and an enthralling game against the mighty Sandgrounders (Southport F.C.) but alas it looks like the Beranbeu and Allianz Arena awaits.

Why do they have to save face….. An investigation does not have to find someone guilty to prove they are competent. They should have learnt that from the postmasters inquiry.

 

[Metal Biker]

City seem to have forgotten about RAWK.

’Cheating Bastards On And Off The Pitch’

View attachment 117553

Hang on... that's not the same thread title as before!?!

Never scared, nope, not one bit of it.

 

[cheekybids]

City seem to have forgotten about RAWK.

’Cheating Bastards On And Off The Pitch’

View attachment 117553

Surely they are deserving of a letter….

 

[wolviedinho]

Don't, that will be another few thousand views which we shouldn't be giving the twat

He has made a fortune out of taking the piss out of the whole rag fanbase so he ain’t all bad -:)

He has also spoken outlandish lies about city to now find himself in the shit. People may not like this new found YouTuber platform but thousands subscribe and it has become a viable information portal. You don’t need to have any sort of education, acting like a big mouth idiot will do.

So it’s an excellent starting point to tackle the lies and disinformation spreading about the club on the socials. Let’s hope the journalists are next and the biased commentators.

If this doesn’t show strength from the club, which we have all been calling for then nothing will be good enough for some people.

Taking on active slanderous/libel entities is a big shift imo. We ain’t going away and it does not prove we are guilty, far from it. It proves they have gotten away with it for far too long and we must have been given a nudge as to how the investigation is going to start the bullish approach. They have had their fun, now it time for the blues machine to bare its teeth.

Well done the city legal team. This move by the club is like they are playing chess with the league all the while the league thinks it’s playing domino’s with grandad from only fools.

 

[BringBackSwales]

He quite clearly did, i don't want to talk about the 115 "NOT BECAUSE I HAVE BEEN LEGALLY THREATENED BY CITY" now confirmed by Goldbridge, your thought's.

Exactly. So he didn’t say he’d been legally threatened

 

[cheekybids]

At least we could defend from a position of strength.

Is that a high line or a low block?

 

[Xhavenjoe]

He quite clearly did, i don't want to talk about the 115 "NOT BECAUSE I HAVE BEEN LEGALLY THREATENED BY CITY" now confirmed by Goldbridge, your thought's.

That appears open to interpretation.
I'm still not clear is he saying he got one or not.

If he had said " I don't want to talk about the 115 BECAUSE I HAVE BEEN LEGALLY THREATENED BY CITY" it would be clearer.

 

[Mcfc1.9.8.0]

That appears open to interpretation.
I'm still not clear is he saying he got one or not.

If he had said " I don't want to talk about the 115 BECAUSE I HAVE BEEN LEGALLY THREATENED BY CITY" it would be clearer.

Hasn’t he just put another video out saying he got one and he will show it on his podcast on Tuesday

 

[Petrovs left peg]

I don't know how the **** makes a living, he has zero personality.

In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king