Russian invasion of Ukraine

This is lunacy. Obliterate it mate - to the last Ukrainianian!

You do realise US have final action on whatever nuclear capacity UK/EU/Nato have?

Do you understand article 5?

It doesn't mean we can launch war against Russia, get bombed and sit there and have daddy USA come to rescue. Tut, tut, tut, no, no, no.

Starmer only gave his speech about ramped up defence spending post meeting with Trump. Connect the dots? America isn't there to defend wars that European parties of Nato get themselves into.

Now ask yourself - why was Nato formed? Does that threat still exist? Who actually benefits from mass spending on military? Who benefited from WW1, WW2?

For what ever madman Putin is deemed to be - surely we are thankful he hasn't hit out yet? Why do you think that is? Do you think it would be better if Putin and Russia lived up to the Western ideal and rain terror on Kiev, drop nukes, invade Finland?
What do you mean by US having final action?
 
Just the rich resource land in Ukraine is it? Who told you that? When did we know that land was such plentiful - surely Putin would have already invaded years ago?

Obviously tons more to it all, but Russia need a warm weather port, on the South.

Did you know that Putin asked Bill Clinton to join Nato?

What is the point of Nato in 2025 if not an extension of USA hegemony and influence?
So what you're saying is that it was a blatant land grab?
 
So a guess basically. Why not state that rather than try to pass it as fact?
I wasn't stating anything as fact. It would be well for you to not twist what I further say into whatever narrative you see this ending.

Do you want me to post the sources/accounts I follow to get news on this?
 
I wasn't stating anything as fact. It would be well for you to not twist what I further say into whatever narrative you see this ending.

Do you want me to post the sources/accounts I follow to get news on this?
Yes you were! You clearly stated that they were behind the drone attack.
Are you going to answer the question I asked about the US having final action on our nucs
 
Crimea has always been Russian. All the people that are in Crimea voted that they wanted to be Russian, and a part of Russia.

Is that not the democracy that we want.
I think rather a lot of Crimean tatars (dead, exiled, emigrated or forcibly Russified) might dispute the word ‘always’. among many other ethnic groups subsumed by imperial Russia.

It’s a bit like Britain saying we should retake the US because it’s ‘always’ been ours, except for a dispute about tax and tea.

‘Always’ is perhaps the most misused word in the English language.

Eg “City have ‘always’ been a small club” - ie bullshit.
 
Apart from most of this century, you mean?

You do realise most of this century is not what you can remember, or even told?

Just because you wear a Poppy you think history stops at 1914

Our ancestors had to survive war, avoided death just so us 2 idiots can debate crap on a forum!

Crimeans want to be Russian - is that not fair?

USA wants to spread democracy ----
 
You do realise most of this century is not what you can remember, or even told?

Just because you wear a Poppy you think history stops at 1914

Our ancestors had to survive war, avoided death just so us 2 idiots can debate crap on a forum!

Crimeans want to be Russian - is that not fair?

USA wants to spread democracy ----
Crimeans want to be Russian. Is this another guess pretending to be fact?
 
Yes you were! You clearly stated that they were behind the drone attack.
Are you going to answer the question I asked about the US having final action on our nucs

I've never stated any fact, nor do I expect of rely on anyone within this thread to state primary sourced fact onto what they say.

If you don't believe me, so be it. That's not on me. If you don't wan't to believe me, so be it as well.

USA have final action on our nukes, without actually researching it will be to do with USA controlling the worlds air defence and us having the launch from sea? - why should that worry you?

If the UK were allowed guns - would you be safe or a public risk, you seem to want to attack nuke and kill? Tranquillo.
 
I've never stated any fact, nor do I expect of rely on anyone within this thread to state primary sourced fact onto what they say.
1944 fact about Crimea for you

Approx 200,000 Crimean tatars ethnically and culturally cleansed.

Just because you love Putin , doesn’t mean Crimean history started in 1945…

Or 1783?
1751404747622.png
 
Last edited:
The Russians wanted to steal resource rich land from the Ukrainians. It was a blatant land grab. That's why they invaded. They thought the West would have no stomach for supporting Ukraine and it would be easy pickings.
Actually they invaded in 2014 and we the west did nothing.So little cunty thought well ill have all of Ukraine..
 
1944 fact about Crimea for you

Approx 200,000 Crimean tatars ethnically and culturally cleansed.

Just because you love Putin , doesn’t mean Crimean history started in 1945…

Or 1783?
View attachment 161754


Questioning this war - always a Putin lver? 3 years I've been questioning why the UK should be partaking in killing men in foreign land without threat.

Why does Mertz and Starmer want this war?

What I hate is our leaders saying 'Till the last Ukranian' - do you want your son, brother, farther being droned to death beause Trump and Starmer signed more funded. CUNTS
 
Last edited:
Actually they invaded in 2014 and we the west did nothing.So little cunty thought well ill have all of Ukraine..

Why did CIA fund Georgian snipers to shoot at people during the Maidan riot?

Tell me the Georgian fella that facilitated this whole death snipering operation from Georgia Mikheil Saakashvili.

The same guy that went tank craazy trying to invade Abkhazia in 2008 on behest of the CIA.

If you want me to provide prove on this I'll do it..
 
.
This is lunacy. Obliterate it mate - to the last Ukrainianian!

You do realise US have final action on whatever nuclear capacity UK/EU/Nato have?

Do you understand article 5?

It doesn't mean we can launch war against Russia, get bombed and sit there and have daddy USA come to rescue. Tut, tut, tut, no, no, no.

Starmer only gave his speech about ramped up defence spending post meeting with Trump. Connect the dots? America isn't there to defend wars that European parties of Nato get themselves into.

Now ask yourself - why was Nato formed? Does that threat still exist? Who actually benefits from mass spending on military? Who benefited from WW1, WW2?

For what ever madman Putin is deemed to be - surely we are thankful he hasn't hit out yet? Why do you think that is? Do you think it would be better if Putin and Russia lived up to the Western ideal and rain terror on Kiev, drop nukes, invade Finland?

Point 1. The US has zero control over UK and French Nukes.

Point 2. Supplying arms is not going to war with a county, so if Russia attacks Germany, Germany can invoke article 5.

That being said. Russia won’t attack Germany. They will bluff and bluster about it. Nothing more.
 
Last edited:

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top