johnny crossan
Well-Known Member
I didn't know that, helpful of them.FBI, got info on platini from UAE cyber team
I didn't know that, helpful of them.FBI, got info on platini from UAE cyber team
Stefan says he doesn't know, he thinks we're clear and when it turns out he's right he'll be buying a crate of red for PB for being correct all along. What poles are you talking about?Other than they are such polar opposites they literally can't both be true.
we'll be therewhat if the panel takes 10 more years to "work" on the decision? if nobody can tell them to hurry the fuck up whats limit in place for them to drag it out.
Why? In what way is it unhelpful?Like most of us on here you are in no position to judge the merits or otherwise of either of their sources. It is also unhelpful of Stefan to seek to undermine PBs account and quite telling.
Are you claiming that Colin doesn't have a source and that he's just made one up to validate his own theory on why this is playing out as it is?Why? In what way is it unhelpful?
It is actually very helpful, given that PB's claim is clearly horseshit, and he had only managed to hoodwink people into believing him because, well ultimately we all Want it to be true (myself included) because it means good news for the club. But it is fantasy. And dismissing it helps.
Pretty much also the reason I am so riled up by it.
Ah well, looks like you've got one resourceful fanboy at least, good luck to you both - let's watch City get squashed so you pair can leap up and down jeering at PB.Why? In what way is it unhelpful?
It is actually very helpful, given that PB's claim is clearly horseshit, and he had only managed to hoodwink people into believing him because, well ultimately we all Want it to be true (myself included) because it means good news for the club. But it is fantasy. And dismissing it helps.
Pretty much also the reason I am so riled up by it.
Hilda Baker says she knows y'know we can ask her
High degree of quality? I don’t doubt the ability of a KC but the substantive evidence presented by the league to accuse fraud is made up of out of context hacked emails and published financial accounts. Mancini didn’t get a call and neither did Yaya’s agent.As a group, the lawyers (solicitors, barristers and internal counsel) would have a feel as would others. And, it is self evident that City are confident and have been throughout (spending and other soft signals).
But there are no guarantees and I KNOW (yes from top, top, top sources), that they hope they landed some key arguments but that they recognise there is no certainty and litigation risk is substantial and real in all cases.
And both sides had multiple top KCs so you can be assured the PL also presented its case aggressively and with a high degree of quality.
This is what I don't understand - they've had 8 months to look at the evidence and they still haven't reached a decision. They may as well toss a coin at this point and get it over with.what if the panel takes 10 more years to "work" on the decision? if nobody can tell them to hurry the fuck up whats limit in place for them to drag it out.
Deranged. But could you show me when you have ever added anything helpful to this thread? And no, I don't count conspiracy theories.Like most of us on here you are in no position to judge the merits or otherwise of either of their sources. It is also unhelpful of Stefan to seek to undermine PBs account and quite telling.
Another one who needs a lie down. We should share our thoughts as respectfully as we can and you allow yourself to be played like a Stradivarius by behaving like a spoilt brat whenever anyone has the temerity to call you out for blatant self-promotion.Deranged. But could you show me when you have ever added anything helpful to this thread? And no, I don't count conspiracy theories.
I think PB was used to being the go to guy on here about City & FFP since it all kicked off many years ago, it's clear he's put a lot of work into the whole situation and knows a lot (far more than me). I'm not sure when Stefan started posting regularly on here but since then it's always felt like PB has been trying to prove that he's more in the know about it all & always been an edge to his posts with Stefan.Are you claiming that Colin doesn't have a source and that he's just made one up to validate his own theory on why this is playing out as it is?
Or they reached a decision months ago and the parties agreed to delay its publication.This is what I don't understand - they've had 8 months to look at the evidence and they still haven't reached a decision. They may as well toss a coin at this point and get it over with.
I never said that either.Other than they are such polar opposites they literally can't both be true.
Could someone please give an educated guess as to why when we were believing that it would take so many months before a decision was reached,then subsequently released,why are we still waiting on the outcome..
Is that instead of your old name for it "the knocking shop" ?Contemporary social mores require me to now call it my person cave.
because both parties agreed long ago to publicize the ruling only after the CWC was finished?Could someone please give an educated guess as to why when we were believing that it would take so many months before a decision was reached,then subsequently released,why are we still waiting on the outcome..