The Fat el Hombre
Well-Known Member
Another israeli terrorist attack caught on camera then (they're bombing Syria again this time):
Only when all the Palestinians are dead or out of Gaza and the West Bank.Jesus it never ends does it.
And even then I'm not sure. There'll be other land to grab.Only when all the Palestinians are dead or out of Gaza and the West Bank.
I agree
You're a bit dense aren't you?
Thats a letter from the UN Observer for Palestine, in other words their official representative, not a UN official. Don't you think they're going to be just a little bit biased? Now be a good boy, do as mummy tells you, drink your milk and go to bed.
Jordan next.Only when all the Palestinians are dead or out of Gaza and the West Bank.
He certainly has form for going on the attack and then disappearing. Someone, can't remember who, asked him, after one of the posts you mentioned, whether the illegal settlers in the West Bank should be removed."Biased" - well not as much as the stuff that comes out of Israel which is a total joke ! Do you think those things outlined in the report didn't really happen ? Even if only 10% happened, it's a disgrace. Plus Israel keeping all the international journalists out of Gazza doesn't help. After all, you would think that if they were proud of what they did and had nothing to hide, they would want the journalists there to showcase to the world all their good work or at least prove that the other side was lying!
Earlier, I actually meant to link to a couple of UN reports (not the one I included). These are shown below. Both of these are from fairly highly respected sources. Perhaps they will be more to your liking - though I doubt it as their conclusions are broadly similar!
https://www.un.org/unispal/document/genocide-as-colonial-erasure-report-francesca-albanese-01oct24/
https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-rele...aels-warfare-methods-gaza-consistent-genocide
"Dense" you say ! That is a laugh coming from someone who used stupid little graphs (meaningless data and even time points) and absurd analogies with the British forces in N. Ireland to prove that there was no genocide taking place in Gazza or to help justify the IDF's slaughter of 1000's of innocent victims.
With regard to "running home to mummy", again quite interesting as this is exactly what you did when you posted your stupid little charts/NI analogy then you disappeared for a few days without the briefest defence of your argument(s) - quite understable really given how pathetic they were, only to come back days later hoping that people wouldn't remember. Like a kid taking their ball home and then showing up at the park a few days later with it tucked under their arm hoping to start afresh all over again!
Anyway, I am sure there must be something that makes you so biased on this subject - religious background, upbringing, whatever, as I don't think any sane / logical person would make some of the "arguments" you make. It is obviously an emotional belief so there is little point debating with you. Just deflection after deflection and a total unwillingness to admit that Israel is wrong, even to some degree, no matter what horrors they commit. Remember Israel is meant to be a legitimate State. Shame it doesn't act like one!
Here's my answer. Yes they should, although there should be some land exchanges around the old 1948 borders. I've said on numerous occasions that the settlers are a major issue. I've said on numerous occasions that I find the continued action of the IDF horrific (although Hamas could stop it overnight) and that Netanyahu's major concern is saving his own skin. How many more fucking times do I need to repeat the same things?He certainly has form for going on the attack and then disappearing. Someone, can't remember who, asked him, after one of the posts you mentioned, whether the illegal settlers in the West Bank should be removed.
No answer was forthcoming despite repeated pleas, as it would be interesting to know.
Next question: do you believe yet that it is genocide?Here's my answer. Yes they should, although there should be some land exchanges around the old 1948 borders. I've said on numerous occasions that the settlers are a major issue. I've said on numerous occasions that I find the continued action of the IDF horrific (although Hamas could stop it overnight) and that Netanyahu's major concern is saving his own skin. How many more fucking times do I need to repeat the same things?
I see there's condemnation in here of Israel's actions against Syria, without any condemnation of the Syrian forces massacres of the Druze in Southern Syria. There's a large Druze population in Israel and they're trying to protect them and warn the Syrians off.
But there's a cabal on here who'd rather overlook one side committing massacres because it doesn't fit their biased narrative.
Next question?
Another one who can't seem to read, or comprehend what they're reading. No it's not genocide, whatever else it is (and there's lots of bad things you could describe it as).Next question: do you believe yet that it is genocide?
Personally, I can't see much difference between what has been happening in Gaza and what happened to Jews in WWII other than the methodology and the scale. It's that bad now IMO.
Personally ,I think every Jew world wide should be utterly ashamed of Israel (as the only Jewish state) because they now represent what nearly annihilated the Jewish race only a few generations ago.
Appreciate the answer. Agree with the points in your first paragraph although don't think Hamas releasing all the remaining hostages would satisfy Netanyahu and his cronies. They want to evacuate Gaza, that seems clear to me.Here's my answer. Yes they should, although there should be some land exchanges around the old 1948 borders. I've said on numerous occasions that the settlers are a major issue. I've said on numerous occasions that I find the continued action of the IDF horrific (although Hamas could stop it overnight) and that Netanyahu's major concern is saving his own skin. How many more fucking times do I need to repeat the same things?
I see there's condemnation in here of Israel's actions against Syria, without any condemnation of the Syrian forces massacres of the Druze in Southern Syria. There's a large Druze population in Israel and they're trying to protect them and warn the Syrians off.
But there's a cabal on here who'd rather overlook one side committing massacres because it doesn't fit their biased narrative.
Next question?