Churchlawtonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 May 2009
- Messages
- 16,617
OK understood, I will try and avoid using. :-)Just being fascecious really, apologies. It’s a phrase that annoys me.
OK understood, I will try and avoid using. :-)Just being fascecious really, apologies. It’s a phrase that annoys me.
What do you mean? Its just a turn of phase, which means I understand what you're saying.
Should have put it in the ‘Things that annoy you thread’OK understood, I will try and avoid using. :-)
In total i got 11k in grants. Three grand of that went straight to the landlord of the building my shop is in for rent when i was shut down.What about the 80% of their pay that was paid to millions of people in furlough payments? Of course those people had that didn't they.
I'm really not motivated to jump on any PPE scandal bandwagon. Doubtless some bad decisions were taken but the vast majority have to be seen in the context of the fact that the UK was in panic mode. We were desperate to buy PPE and respirators from anywhere we could get them and it's obvious we couldn't go through the usual, drawn out procurement processes that would have taken months at least. Hospital staff were desperate for any PPE they could get. I am sure some things were done that should not have been. I am equally sure that most MPs and ministers are decent and honest and that most of the noise is fuelled by political opposition milking the story as much as possible.
And a minor point, this still doesn't explain how TinFoilHat has his money taken off him by rich people. The money the government paid out was not his money.
Facetious.Just being fascecious really, apologies. It’s a phrase that annoys me.
Thank you, I was really having trouble with that :-)Facetious.
There is no PPE scandal bandwagon. It was just plain corruption, which was brushed under the carpet by the subsequent enquiries.What about the 80% of their pay that was paid to millions of people in furlough payments? Of course those people had that didn't they.
I'm really not motivated to jump on any PPE scandal bandwagon. Doubtless some bad decisions were taken but the vast majority have to be seen in the context of the fact that the UK was in panic mode. We were desperate to buy PPE and respirators from anywhere we could get them and it's obvious we couldn't go through the usual, drawn out procurement processes that would have taken months at least. Hospital staff were desperate for any PPE they could get. I am sure some things were done that should not have been. I am equally sure that most MPs and ministers are decent and honest and that most of the noise is fuelled by political opposition milking the story as much as possible.
And a minor point, this still doesn't explain how TinFoilHat has his money taken off him by rich people. The money the government paid out was not his money.
That's just one of the articles. It originates from the government. Which doesn't need to get involved.If you look elsewhere on the Broadband site where the article originates, there is an article suggesting the government needs to get involved as viewing habits chnage and move towards IPTV based viewing.
Of course the working classes are worse off that had they still been working full time. But we had COVID and the medical advice was that we needed shutdowns. Sitting at home and getting 80% of the normal wage, certainly made them better off than sitting at home and getting 0%. It's highly misleading to say that the furlough scheme made everyone worse off!Your first paragraph is what i was referring to. Forgetting the abomination that was PPE. If the government gave everyone was it 16 or 20k? No working class people i know have ended up 20k better off as it all went on food and bills. Ok, some might have over indulged on cheap booze too from the supermarkets during that time.
The government are worse off for giving that money out. The working class are no better off and to be honest probably worse off. Meanwhile inequality has never grown so fast. Stocks, shares and gold have all reached all time highs. So you don’t have to be a detective to see who’s hands the trillion pounds or whatever it was has ended up in.
No, you’re missing my point mate. I’m not saying getting 80% instead of 100% wage made them worse off. In fact you could argue the opposite in that time because you couldn’t go the match, pub, restaurants etc and there wasn’t much point buying clothes with nowhere to go. Plus no petrol to pay for.Of course the working classes are worse off that had they still been working full time. But we had COVID and the medical advice was that we needed shutdowns. Sitting at home and getting 80% of the normal wage, certainly made them better off than sitting at home and getting 0%. It's highly misleading to say that the furlough scheme made everyone worse off!
Easiest way to remember how to spell it is that it is one of the few words that has all 5 vowels in in alphabetical order.Thank you, I was really having trouble with that :-)
He said you're naive. We have to get wealth off the super wealthy or have lots more poverty.Sorry I know one should have an open mind but I flatly refuse to listen to a single word that bloke utters. I can't stand the the bloke. That's just how it is.
Did he explain how someone took TinFoilHat's money off him, and what money was it that TinFoilHat had before it was taken off him?
Anyway, I don't like arguing with you, you're not dim ;-)
Have a good evening.
Pity Brexit had already halved the industry.Looks like the UK car industry is currently in free fall.
The result of a double whammy of a relatively poor trade deal with Trump which added 10% tarriffs to UK car exports when we had an overall trade balance with the US.
Combined with Milliband punishing and fining them for making and selling cars the consumer wants. Leading to manufacturers leaving the UK. Smart move Mr Milliband.
![]()
UK vehicle making hits lowest level since 1953, excluding Covid
Data shows a slump in car and van production as the industry trade body hopes a UK-US tariff deal will bring "confidence".www.bbc.co.uk
Wow the things you learn here, thank you.Easiest way to remember how to spell it is that it is one of the few words that has all 5 vowels in in alphabetical order.
So she only increased it by 150%. Well done Maggie.What I meant was how much of our oil and gas revenues were spent on that, which was your point. Had you said some of it went on that, then OK. But you did say most.
Doing a quick google, north sea oil and gas generated about £10bn per year in government revenue at its peak in the 1980's vs a dole bill at the time typically 3 or 4, peaked briefly at 6. So on face value there's some merit in what you say, although it is a bit less than half to be strictly accurate.
But you cannot attribute 100% of the unemployment to Thatcher. There were 1.3m unemployed when she first entered office.
Bet he wouldn’t be frothing if GB News and Mailonline were mandated.hahahahaha
I'm working class and got rock all of my normal wage.Of course the working classes are worse off that had they still been working full time. But we had COVID and the medical advice was that we needed shutdowns. Sitting at home and getting 80% of the normal wage, certainly made them better off than sitting at home and getting 0%. It's highly misleading to say that the furlough scheme made everyone worse off!
Best PM in the past 50 years. I imagine your myriad misconceptions and broken ideogies lead you to a different conclusion.So she only increased it by 150%. Well done Maggie.
Why not? Was the furlough scheme just something I imagined?I'm working class and got rock all of my normal wage.
I doubt he said anything to me at all. And he's a **** who I wouldn't piss on if he was on fire. So really not bothered what he has to say.He said you're naive. We have to get wealth off the super wealthy or have lots more poverty.