mexico1970
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 Jun 2019
- Messages
- 33,765
- Team supported
- Manchester City
SpillAnybody seen Stefan’s posts on Twitter about rule changes ?
Interesting some additional unexpected big stuff could have happened at the hearing
And for those of us not on twatter?Anybody seen Stefan’s posts on Twitter about rule changes ?
Interesting some additional unexpected big stuff could have happened at the hearing
To be fair, pretty much everyone was saying UEFA were corrupt for decades before anything to do with City happened.For sure and that is known evidence in the public domain. But Cty fans were claiming that the only reason charges were brought and then upheld by UEFA was because they were corrupt, that was long before CAS got involved let alone issued their judgement.
And for those of us not on twatter?
Name them.
I have my fill of dickheads here, i dont need extra onesEveryone who says they are not on twatter are invariably on twatter, I can't honestly believe that people spend any time on bluesky on their jack jones.
Amazing thread this to be fair, no news about anything at all and it has reached 5 and a half thousand pages.
Tomorrow?Today?
I have my fill of dickheads here, i dont need extra ones
I think we can all agree that it's nearly imminent.Tomorrow?
I reckon you've answered your own question.Why would a City fan reply "We getting away with it" ?
I dont want to get away with it i want City to be proved to be 100% innocent
Why would a City fan reply "We getting away with it" ?
I dont want to get away with it i want City to be proved to be 100% innocent
Could be sarcasm or mischief. I sometimes wind up rags by telling them we’reIt’s twitter.
It’s just some dumb kid.
TwiceEveryone who says they are not on twatter are invariably on twatter, I can't honestly believe that people spend any time on bluesky on their jack jones.
Amazing thread this to be fair, no news about anything at all and it has reached 5 and a half thousand pages.
Help us out then…….Anybody seen Stefan’s posts on Twitter about rule changes ?
Interesting some additional unexpected big stuff could have happened at the hearing
He posted something about new rules put in place about impartiality and availability for arbitrators. He presumed it was a reaction to an issue that has arisen in a recent caseHelp us out then…….
Can you provide the link pls mate?He posted something about new rules put in place about impartiality and availability for arbitrators. He presumed it was a reaction to an issue that has arisen in a recent case