PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

give it to gordon said:
Masters was never in a strong position. He was 4th choice, interviewed by the dippers and rags. Masters was always going to do what the American red cartel want.
The 3 people who turned the job down I would guess had a backbone and integrity
Click to expand...
Apparently one of the contenders who wanted the job after Peter Scudamore left was none other than our friend Javier (twatface) Tebas……so maybe it could’ve been worse:)
 
mexico1970 said:
Do you know what I have been asking myself exactly the same thing, I have 500 followers after posting the sum total of maybe 6 posts and it's empty, it's reportedly full of people who left twatter never to go back.

But they are all still there just watching, staring, obsessively hating it all and not posting on the kind friendly site that is bluesky because it's a boring echo chamber a zombie site.

Well you asked mate :)
Click to expand...

Mine would be a very small account but, like me, most of the people I know who are on Bluesky left Twitter (X) because it was taken over by a literal fascist and the algorithm had been tweaked so as to turn it into a mouthpiece for similarly inclined cunts.

Like all social media, Bluesky is far from perfect but, again in my experience, the level of discourse is significantly more rounded and intelligent than that of X in its death throes.

Admittedly, still lurk on X (where I had a fairly decent-sized account) occasionally. In the same way that I thumb through Sun and The Mail and the Telegraph etc., I do it as a sort of layman's anthropological exercise. It can be fascinating see what new fury is bubbling in the cesspool/ what passes for with amongst the empathetically challenged etc.
 
mad4city said:
Mine would be a very small account but, like me, most of the people I know who are on Bluesky left Twitter (X) because it was taken over by a literal fascist and the algorithm had been tweaked so as to turn it into a mouthpiece for similarly inclined cunts.

Like all social media, Bluesky is far from perfect but, again in my experience, the level of discourse is significantly more rounded and intelligent than that of X in its death throes.

Admittedly, still lurk on X (where I had a fairly decent-sized account) occasionally. In the same way that I thumb through Sun and The Mail and the Telegraph etc., I do it as a sort of layman's anthropological exercise. It can be fascinating see what new fury is bubbling in the cesspool/ what passes for with amongst the empathetically challenged etc.
Click to expand...

You had me at " Still lurk on X", drawn like a Moth to a flame. Just because people agree with your point of view it doesn't mean they have empathy.
 
Last edited:
give it to gordon said:
Masters was never in a strong position. He was 4th choice, interviewed by the dippers and rags. Masters was always going to do what the American red cartel want.
The 3 people who turned the job down I would guess had a backbone and integrity
Click to expand...
You have to remember that they have their fingers in the pie elsewhere.
The EFL chairman is Dick Parry, a former Liverpool chairman. He was working with them and Man Utd to come up with project big picture which would have given them control of every single aspect of football in England.
You have the FA who have suspended a highly rated player who plays for West Ham for 2 years because someone in his home town put a bet on that was the equivalent of £1 with a potential winning jackpot of £6.
Heck, the fuckers gave up hosting some of the NFL games at Wembley so Spurs could gain the fucking money.
 
mexico1970 said:
Some meat on those bones courtesy of AI.

Premier League CEO Richard Masters was interviewed by Manchester United and Liverpool, but not in the context of being hired by them. Instead, the interviews focused on the Premier League's handling of Manchester City's alleged financial rule breaches. These interviews were part of broader discussions about the league's handling of the situation.


www.dailymail.co.uk

Prem teams furious as Liverpool and United vet league CEO candidates

Liverpool and Manchester United have left their Premier League rivals furious after reportedly having had special access to weigh up the candidates to be new chief executive of the Premier League.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk
Click to expand...
That story needs re-promotion and re-circulating aplenty, esp at the moment and in the coming weeks.
 
hertsblue said:
The non co-operation is such a pile of shit, its like someone asking you to pass them a knife so they can stab you. Thought also only UEFA fined us once for non co-operation due to the leaks coming from them.
If we get this charge from the PL, i hope the club fight it and goes public with any shit they have on the investigation and leaks/cartel etc
Click to expand...
I think that CAS upheld some 10 million euros of the "fine" not because they had any reason to believe that our cooperation would have provided proof of our guilt but quite the opposite - full cooperation from City should have shown that UEFA had no case at all before we got anywhere near CAS. This seems to have passed Old Nik by completely.
 
Stoned Rose said:
“PL clubs must act in the utmost good faith towards each other at all times”.
Click to expand...

A supposed tenet of the PL operations, which Masters however totally ignores in order to comply with the directions of the cabal and upon whose behalf he was employed.

I look forward to the point where the **** is exposed and prosecuted for his part in the whole corrupt proceedings.
 
Chris-NCL said:
Absolutely hope you are either cleared of it, or get away Scot free.
At this point it’s not even about the possible positive outcomes it has for my club (Newcastle), it’s about fucking over the cartel clubs.
Click to expand...
Be honest though you didn’t give a fuck until the rules started fucking your club over did you?
 
Centurions said:
Yep, Dinnage accepted in Nov 2018 and changed her mind on the 30th of Dec 2018 before actually taking over in 2019. It was leaked that undue influence by a small handful of clubs was the reason given by one of the 3 but never confirmed which (if true).
Click to expand...
Spot-on. At least one of them pulled out because they could see the structure was corrupt. My money is on Dinnage. Still no questions from the media.
 
Dannyblue52 said:
No action was taken for breaches of this rule though. Even though it was on Arsenal headed paper.
Click to expand...
They wanted us banned from Europe before the outcome of the UEFA case. How vindictive and absurd was that letter signed by 8 clubs? How moronic are some of these Club Directors? Don’t they take legal advice?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top