Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
Exactly. If it's at fair market value then there's no issue.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
They know we’ve won and will spend a f#cking shed load was it’s over. Last chance saloon.
Its going well for the red cartel whilst Newcastle Aston Villa have to tread carefully despite having the cash to spend big. Ricky Masters and UEFA doing a great job of protecting the status quo. Liverpool needed the Moores money to become a big club. That would not happen now. Most Liverpool fans will conveniently forget or not know this fact.
manimanc
Well-Known Member
That's what I think too.
Especially the tramps spending all that bread all of a sudden, very strange.
Red cartel wanker clubs showing their arse yet again.
BerkshireBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Jan 2015
- Messages
- 4,519
yeah, is this part of the reason for the delaying of the verdict. Fucks up one more transfer window for us.
patrickblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 Jun 2006
- Messages
- 110
So what happened to the legendary net spend kings?
Newman Noggs
Well-Known Member
All this says to me that the architects of the current "financial sustainability" rules know they are about to be abandoned.
cityboy2602
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 298
They still are, there's plenty of Coutinho money left
the blue panther
Well-Known Member
And the scum are even running a dual accounting system which absolutely no-one is apparently investigating or challenging, but, the good news is, they're still scum and they've still got a shit team.
I hope they get smashed by Arsenal at home a week on Sunday in their 1st match. Maybe they need a triple accounting system to stop the wheels coming off from day 1.
Scum!
tolmie's hairdoo
Well-Known Member
Surely if that's the case, City would also be spending like no tomorrow and might even be prepared to pay off the likes of Phillips and Jack?
The Light Was Yellow Sir
Well-Known Member
Sesko going to number 2 on that list.
Surprised he’s gone to a club sacking people left, right and centre and, according to their owner, teetering on the edge of bankruptcy. No European football either, and no recent prize money to speak of and yet…
manimanc
Well-Known Member
I know what your answer will be but are you insinuating that you've heard that we are ready to splash out and pay off Jack and Big Kal.....
tolmie's hairdoo
Well-Known Member
Haha, exactly the opposite, sadly.
Too many of our players refusing to move on and run down their deals.
The same ones who all wanted rises and extensions after the Treble, as Txiki hinted towards.
Say what you want about Walker, and I've said plenty, but he chose playing before cash.
We dozed on the job.
manimanc
Well-Known Member
Wouldn't this be similar to insider trading - clubs acting in the knowledge of, but before an announcement? Similar to clubs acting pro-actively on knowledge of proposed rule changes. If United and Liverpool are getting the heads up from their appointee, Masters, that should be illegal too.
For insider trading you have to use inside information that is not publicly available. PL clubs may just be guessing, which is ok.
Blueknows
Well-Known Member
Bet youre not far from the truth , how can the rags plead poverty by xmas/if they dont win the europa , make 450 staff redundant in a cost cutting exercise to splurging 200 m ??
That's what is being implied here. Clubs knowing the outcome and spending because they know changes are afoot. Personally, I don't think that's the case, but it is annoying that United can spend way beyond the limit of £105m per year over three years, or whatever that rule is that is being conveniently overlooked or circumvented.
Centurions
Well-Known Member
Definitely not illegal but not needed anyway as all clubs promise to treat each other fairly, equally and with respect.
Allegedly.