Almost as much mock outrage as there was for that other non-story (Beergate) that the Mail featured in its headlines for 7 days running that was subject to an enquiry that established there was no wrongdoing.She’s eligible to vote in three different constituencies, is she not, so perhaps she should clarify which one she intends to vote in and how that relates to where her primary residence is. Which presumably must be in Tameside, given the constituency she represents?
Also, she should perhaps explain why her primary residence for Council Tax is in Tameside.
And also how much time she intends to spend in Hove, given that she lives in London, and represents Ashton, and has Tameside listed as her primary residence for Council Tax.
Also she might want to explain exactly what advice was provided by the tax avoidance lawyers at Shoosmiths.
And whether it’s just an uncanny coincidence that her property in Ashton was valued at £650k, the exact threshold for avoiding IHT on the share of the property she placed in a trust. A transaction which of course facilitated the tax dodge on the property in Hove.
But of course all of this is fine with yourself, isn’t it Victor?
What a stooge.
There is no bias or misogyny from myself or the media nor any question of legality. The reason she is being called out is as I said in my post - Hypocrisy . It appears you are unable to recognise this.You don't care? So just your bias and the media's is why perfectly legal behaviour is front page news. And I assume misogyny.
Did you make any fuss about Kemi Badenoch renting a 6-bed home in her constituency with the taxpayer picking up the rent and council tax?
There is no bias or misogyny from myself or the media nor any question of legality. The reason she is being called out is as I said in my post - Hypocrisy . It appears you are unable to recognise this.
To help you, have a listen to this - your boss on tax avoidance and politicians...
Don't worry Bob, I am not expecting you to recognise hypocrisy.No bias or misogyny from the media? Bit early to be smoking meth.
There’s no decline in the birth rate in our major cities and certainly no population decline in the UK, we had large amounts of immigrants in the 1960s,70s,80s,90, 00s,10, and now in the 20s. Public finances are a disaster services are over stretched. Just how long do we continue with this balmy idea that the country must have mass immigration.
So the poll tax makes it all ok?
It’s a solid argument, really is.
Have you run out of red paint or zebra crossings?The worst fuckin government in my lifetime! Labour is for the non working lazy scruffy cunts! 100000000%
Don't worry Bob, I am not expecting you to recognise hypocrisy.
Example being ?I read your posts, mate. If hypocrisy was a natural resource you would be nationalised.
There’s no decline in the birth rate in our major cities and certainly no population decline in the UK, we had large amounts of immigrants in the 1960s,70s,80s,90, 00s,10, and now in the 20s. Public finances are a disaster services are over stretched. Just how long do we continue with this balmy idea that the country must have mass immigration.
Please like me!!!
Spineless ****
Brilliant.I initially read that as ‘on his hat’. Why is the silly sod wearing a flag on his hat I thought to myself? To be fair, ‘in his flat’ didn’t really help his case.
Mind you, if Starmer is a fan of the flag he is making it seriously uncool.
These daft fuckers lap up the front pages then pretend to be intelligent.No bias or misogyny from the media? Bit early to be smoking meth.
Can we just skip to the part where Farage is PM rather than dictating Government policy from the sidelines?
She's making Blunkett look like Che Guevara.
Exactly.No bias or misogyny from the media? Bit early to be smoking meth.