The Labour Government

Hertzblue said:
There is no bias or misogyny from myself or the media nor any question of legality. The reason she is being called out is as I said in my post - Hypocrisy . It appears you are unable to recognise this.
To help you, have a listen to this - your boss on tax avoidance and politicians...

Click to expand...


No bias or misogyny from the media? Bit early to be smoking meth.
 
i kne albert davy said:
There’s no decline in the birth rate in our major cities and certainly no population decline in the UK, we had large amounts of immigrants in the 1960s,70s,80s,90, 00s,10, and now in the 20s. Public finances are a disaster services are over stretched. Just how long do we continue with this balmy idea that the country must have mass immigration.
Click to expand...

We obviously need more, then to look after the increased population we just get some more, then to look after the increased population we just get some more, then to look after the increased population we just get some more, then to look after the increased population we just get some more, then to look after the increased population we just get some more, then to look after the increased population we just get some more,

Then AI takes loads of jobs, so we have to pay millions and millions of people for doing nothing, so we tax companies more but we are in competition with the rest of world so be careful or they will threaten us with fucking off. Also these companies don't seem to be making much if you look at their dead honest accounts.

So they will pay just enough to stop mass social unrest. Loads more will be poor and the ones benefitting? The ones that always benefit.

Doff capping materialistic middle fucking England keep voting for the status quo. Selfish wankers.
 
i kne albert davy said:
There’s no decline in the birth rate in our major cities and certainly no population decline in the UK, we had large amounts of immigrants in the 1960s,70s,80s,90, 00s,10, and now in the 20s. Public finances are a disaster services are over stretched. Just how long do we continue with this balmy idea that the country must have mass immigration.
Click to expand...

London’s birth rate in 2024 was 1.35 which is below the national average. Birmingham was 1.75 which above the national average. Glasgow was 1.05 which is bordering on extinction levels. Replacement rate is 2.1.

Immigration is largely the reason we do not have population decline.

This country clearly needs immigration. ‘Mass’ is a subjective term, not an objective measure.
 
BobKowalski said:
I initially read that as ‘on his hat’. Why is the silly sod wearing a flag on his hat I thought to myself? To be fair, ‘in his flat’ didn’t really help his case.

Mind you, if Starmer is a fan of the flag he is making it seriously uncool.
Click to expand...
Brilliant.

"If Starmer likes flags, I'm buggered if I'm wasting any more time up ladders!"
 
threespires said:
She's making Blunkett look like Che Guevara.
Click to expand...

Labour have traditionally being hostile to immigration as they were hostile to the Common Market as it was then. There is a strong streak of social conservatism and nativism in its DNA.

It’s always put me off and it’s one of the reasons why I’ve only voted Labour twice in my life, and that was 2015 and last year.

Labour have three years or so to sort out two main issues. The economy and boat crossings (asylum) and I am pretty sure they will solve the boat crossings or at least the optics of the boat crossings, because they have no other option and that is a tremendous motivator. You may not like the methods used, though. I’m pretty sure I won’t either.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top