Russian invasion of Ukraine

I’m far from a Trump supporter, but IMO he has a point (about NATO countries buying from Russia).
Ye non of them should but I also question after 3 years how are there anymore sanctions to put on them, Shirley by now there shouldn’t be anymore to do. For me releasing the frozen asserts to Ukraine would be a big fuck you, all those oligarchs losing billions would make Putin target number one
 
He absolutely does, but it’s a red herring designed to deflect and avoid yet another self imposed sanction deadline.
Can’t argue with you there.

Trump got a huge win with NATO in the form of commitments to huge increases in defence spending a few months ago.

He also had a potentially big win with Macron and Starmer creating the coalition of the willing (which would ensure US troops are not stationed in a post war Ukraine).

I think he’s got NATO by the balls and is dragging some members into the real world. And he knows how to get results there…

For his internal politics, it would be easier to swallow a blow to the US economy (after increased sanctions on Russia/China) if other western economies suffered in a similar way.

(This is far from a fanboy perspective. My favourite MP is Corbyn - so I doubt I’d class as a RWNJ - I just think the message is right, despite the obvious deflection taking place).
 
Can’t argue with you there.

Trump got a huge win with NATO in the form of commitments to huge increases in defence spending a few months ago.

He also had a potentially big win with Macron and Starmer creating the coalition of the willing (which would ensure US troops are not stationed in a post war Ukraine).

I think he’s got NATO by the balls and is dragging some members into the real world. And he knows how to get results there…

For his internal politics, it would be easier to swallow a blow to the US economy (after increased sanctions on Russia/China) if other western economies suffered in a similar way.

(This is far from a fanboy perspective. My favourite MP is Corbyn - so I doubt I’d class as a RWNJ - I just think the message is right, despite the obvious deflection taking place).
It’s a fucking disgrace that any European country is knowingly (or recklessly) buying Russian oil or gas.

Apart from any moral consideration, it’s also absolutely fucking insane. That money will literally be spent by Europe’s enemy on means of attacking us.

Why would anyone in their right minds do that?

So on that point, what Trump says (rather than what I expect he believes) is absolutely correct.
 
Easy saying don't buy Russian oil (or gas). Doing it is another thing. Several EU countries are still buying direct. Even Germany still uses Russian gas, just pumped from another country. This all stems from a stupid (but understandable) reliance on Russian oil/gas. In peacetime, the economy comes first, and cheap oil/gas is a must. Now it looks like a poor decision. Governments simply cannot win.
The UK is trying to wean off foreign oil/gas imports with wind and solar. With Nuclear as a backbone when we have little wind or sun.

Trump knows we have no choice at the moment, especially as winter approaches. So it is an easy get-out for him. Ie i'll sanction when you stop buying.
The truth is he can add sanctions anytime. This is just another smoke screen/delaying tactic for agent 47.
 
Easy saying don't buy Russian oil (or gas). Doing it is another thing. Several EU countries are still buying direct. Even Germany still uses Russian gas, just pumped from another country. This all stems from a stupid (but understandable) reliance on Russian oil/gas. In peacetime, the economy comes first, and cheap oil/gas is a must. Now it looks like a poor decision. Governments simply cannot win.
The UK is trying to wean off foreign oil/gas imports with wind and solar. With Nuclear as a backbone when we have little wind or sun.

Trump knows we have no choice at the moment, especially as winter approaches. So it is an easy get-out for him. Ie i'll sanction when you stop buying.
The truth is he can add sanctions anytime. This is just another smoke screen/delaying tactic for agent 47.
I think Europe has done a decent job of greatly reducing its reliance on Russian oil and gas but a poor job of weaning itself off it altogether. In that sense Trump is correct.
 
Yigal Levin, Ukrainian military expert:

It’s no secret that the U.S. lifted sanctions on Belarus’s Belavia in order to help the Russian civilian aviation fleet, which will now be able to purchase spare parts through this very Belavia.

This has already been noted by industry experts.

The U.S. has no interest in allowing Russia’s aviation fleet to degrade to the level of Iran’s, where aircraft from half a century ago literally fall apart in the sky — including helicopters carrying the country’s president.

Meanwhile, there had been great hopes for the degradation of Russia’s civilian infrastructure and maintenance base, but, as always, help comes from the caring Americans, who for 150 years have reliably stood by Russia in its hardest times.

Against this backdrop, there’s another subject that greatly interests me: the maintenance and modernization of Russia’s nuclear arsenal.

If you’ve been following the modernization of the U.S. nuclear arsenal, for example, you know these are astronomical sums.

We’re talking not tens but hundreds of billions of dollars.

During the Soviet era, the USSR was hyper-militarized, where citizens sometimes went hungry and lived in poor conditions, but there was always money for tanks and nukes.

Then, from 1991 onward, Russia could theoretically afford this, as it maintained a peacetime army.

With international support and aggressive budget allocation, I think Russia could have modernized its arsenal.

But today, with a massive mercenary army devouring funds, the defense industry absorbing everything, and no money even left for something like the Kuznetsov aircraft carrier, where could they find “extra” hundreds of billions?

Russia inherited a colossal nuclear arsenal from the USSR but did not inherit even a fraction of the power of the socialist bloc or its social organization.

Time passes, everyone modernizes their arsenals, the U.S. has the money, countries like China and France can also manage, but what about Russia?

It’s worth noting that as soon as things get critical, just like with Belavia, the U.S. will step in to help Russia here as well — to modernize its nuclear stockpiles.

At the very least, to bring them to a state of stable and safe storage.

Or it could become a joint effort — the U.S., China, and maybe Europe would chip in as well.
 
Yigal Levin, Ukrainian military expert:

It’s no secret that the U.S. lifted sanctions on Belarus’s Belavia in order to help the Russian civilian aviation fleet, which will now be able to purchase spare parts through this very Belavia.

This has already been noted by industry experts.

The U.S. has no interest in allowing Russia’s aviation fleet to degrade to the level of Iran’s, where aircraft from half a century ago literally fall apart in the sky — including helicopters carrying the country’s president.

Meanwhile, there had been great hopes for the degradation of Russia’s civilian infrastructure and maintenance base, but, as always, help comes from the caring Americans, who for 150 years have reliably stood by Russia in its hardest times.

Against this backdrop, there’s another subject that greatly interests me: the maintenance and modernization of Russia’s nuclear arsenal.

If you’ve been following the modernization of the U.S. nuclear arsenal, for example, you know these are astronomical sums.

We’re talking not tens but hundreds of billions of dollars.

During the Soviet era, the USSR was hyper-militarized, where citizens sometimes went hungry and lived in poor conditions, but there was always money for tanks and nukes.

Then, from 1991 onward, Russia could theoretically afford this, as it maintained a peacetime army.

With international support and aggressive budget allocation, I think Russia could have modernized its arsenal.

But today, with a massive mercenary army devouring funds, the defense industry absorbing everything, and no money even left for something like the Kuznetsov aircraft carrier, where could they find “extra” hundreds of billions?

Russia inherited a colossal nuclear arsenal from the USSR but did not inherit even a fraction of the power of the socialist bloc or its social organization.

Time passes, everyone modernizes their arsenals, the U.S. has the money, countries like China and France can also manage, but what about Russia?

It’s worth noting that as soon as things get critical, just like with Belavia, the U.S. will step in to help Russia here as well — to modernize its nuclear stockpiles.

At the very least, to bring them to a state of stable and safe storage.

Or it could become a joint effort — the U.S., China, and maybe Europe would chip in as well.
The easiest way for Russia to be able to buy aviation parts is to stop being cunts.
 
August 2025 Main EU purchases of Russian fossil fuels (total 979m euros in August)

Hungary 416m (176 crude oil, most of rest pipeline gas)
Slovakia 276m (204 crude oil, most of rest pipeline gas)

Not sure those are going to change much, and I think it's outside sanctions.

These numbers were a surprise (LNG isn't under sanction):
France 157m, all LNG, some passed on to Germany
Netherlands 65m, all LNG
Belgium 64m LNG


Source: CREA
 
russians are getting fucked in Sumy apparently and close to being fully encircled.

2 Belarusians arrested for using a potential recon drone over a Polish government building too. NATO are shoring up the border by the looks of it.
 
Sorry - Very busy yesterday - catch up:
Stuff 14/09:
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Stuff 15/09:

Interesting to note that Ukrainian AI in the latest Vyriy-10 quadcopter drones is rendering ECM much less effective with terminal guidance in case of signal loss.
A mini cruise missile for $489!

 
Last edited:

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top