NorCalBlue
Well-Known Member
It worked for the PL and our main rivals, but if that’s no longer true, it’s easy to see why they’d scrap it!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Stoned Rose
Well-Known Member
“We are talking to Manchester Utd about an alternative system. That's not to say we don't think the PSR system works, it just doesn’t work well enough to benefit Manchester United and undermine Manchester City" Masters told an audience at the Bent Cunts sports conference.
Nothing says that the current system is working like scrapping it and replacing it with an alternative system.
I actually hate The Premier League and everything it stands for. Nothing matters but money and power.“We are talking to our clubs about an alternative system. That's not to say we don't think the PSR system works," Masters told an audience at the Leaders sports conference.
Nothing says that the current system is working like scrapping it and replacing it with an alternative system.
Unfortunately that’s the way of the world and I despise it.I actually hate The Premier League and everything it stands for. Nothing matters but money and power.
cleavers
Moderator
Luckily we have both.I actually hate The Premier League and everything it stands for. Nothing matters but money and power.
Squad cost ratio based on revenue and if you're too shit to get into Europe you can outspend your PL rivals who do by 15% until you catch up. Previous poster mentioned Everton, this proposal is designed to benefit one team and one team only.
20 team league, 3 promoted clubs can be discounted each season as their revenue will not be up to PL level to complete. Leaves 16 rival teams of which minimum of 6 will be in Europe based on league positions and lets face it likelihood is all 8 European spots will be taken by PL clubs (apologies to bring up Wigan in 2013/14 in the UEFA as the only PL era exception I can recall).
This goes through and the Rags can play catch up outspending % wise over half the division, no other reason this is being proposed as the new model. Fans need to wake up at the toffees, Villa and St James Park ASAP.
They will have a spending advantage over the clubs outside the CL anyway. And then their 15% extra will be very different to say Brentford's 15%, because of their naturally higher revenue. While on the face of it, it helps those clubs outside the CL places, it does favour the bigger clubs a lot more, and helps ensure they don't stay out of it for too long.
Well timed, with their PSR compliance iffy at the moment. How lucky for Liverpool too, PSR getting scrapped the end of the summer they go and spend 500m in. A year ago the PL were happy to go to court with us over their rules. Now, they need to be 'improved' suddenly.
Last edited:
Nothing since I posted either way. I'd say a good chance the parties receive today or in the next 7 days (speculation not fact).Just in light of the post, I'd be interested to know if @slbsn has had any information that the club are in receipt of the verdict or otherwise? I know the last we heard was definitely not - as of last Friday PM - has anything changed with that regard?
How quickly after parties receive do you think an announcement will be made? Do City and the PL agree on a certain period of review before announcing anything?Nothing since I posted either way. I'd say a good chance the parties receive today or in the next 7 days (speculation not fact).
Nothing since I posted either way. I'd say a good chance the parties receive today or in the next 7 days (speculation not fact).
That surely can be said for every week now going forward till it does come out.
Not in the slightest bit a dig at you, just a point on the apparent situation itself.
Yes I think everyone will have agreed a period for checking - 48 hours is a minimum for this I'd say as it is impossible to even read it once properly in less.How quickly after parties receive do you think an announcement will be made? Do City and the PL agree on a certain period of review before announcing anything?
Personally, I think the international weeks are more likely than normal weeks.That surely can be said for every week now going forward till it does come out.
Not in the slightest bit a dig at you, just a point on the apparent situation itself.
1961_vintage
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 16,697
And influence.I actually hate The Premier League and everything it stands for. Nothing matters but money and power.
Rammy Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 May 2008
- Messages
- 32,194
Today is the day, I can sense it.
Don’t think we will hear until early part of next week, but international breaks have always seemed the most logical times.
Don’t think we will hear until early part of next week, but international breaks have always seemed the most logical times.
ayrshire_blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 May 2008
- Messages
- 6,649
Nothing since I posted either way. I'd say a good chance the parties receive today or in the next 7 days (speculation not fact).
Thank you. I know @Nicholas van Whatsisface explicitly stated that the PL officials he spoke to were likely to be acting in bravado rather than knowledge of fact, and I suppose this adds some weight to that likelihood. Cheers.
blue b4 the moon
Well-Known Member
Almost like the PL board are fucked and are getting one last boost in for their payMasters isn't it before they're toast.They will have a spending advantage over the clubs outside the CL anyway. And then their 15% extra will be very different to say Brentford's 15%, because of their naturally higher revenue. While on the face of it, it helps those clubs outside the CL places, it does favour the bigger clubs a lot more, and helps ensure they don't stay out of it for too long.
Well timed, with their PSR compliance iffy at the moment. How lucky for Liverpool too, PSR getting scrapped the end of the summer they go and spend 500m in. A year ago the PL were happy to go to court with us over their rules. Now, they need to be 'improved' suddenly.
And It's that Friday feeling yet again.
I am not surprised by NvW's post. It is broadly consistent with what I have heard. Neither party had the result as of recently and both were confident of prevailing.Thank you. I know @Nicholas van Whatsisface explicitly stated that the PL officials he spoke to were likely to be acting in bravado rather than knowledge of fact, and I suppose this adds some weight to that likelihood. Cheers.
….and the band played on.I am not surprised by NvW's post. It is broadly consistent with what I have heard. Neither party had the result as of recently and both were confident of prevailing.
Marvin.
Well-Known Member
Why do people persist in writing 'Personally, I...'? It's a gratuitous affectation. If you have something to say, be precise, and 'I' is sufficient here.
Centurions
Well-Known Member
Surely they'll still have to comply with PSR up until it's replaced (the last 2 seasons plus this 1?), although I can't see how they manage the transition. Can they just pretend PSR didn't exist and start from scratch?They will have a spending advantage over the clubs outside the CL anyway. And then their 15% extra will be very different to say Brentford's 15%, because of their naturally higher revenue. While on the face of it, it helps those clubs outside the CL places, it does favour the bigger clubs a lot more, and helps ensure they don't stay out of it for too long.
Well timed, with their PSR compliance iffy at the moment. How lucky for Liverpool too, PSR getting scrapped the end of the summer they go and spend 500m in. A year ago the PL were happy to go to court with us over their rules. Now, they need to be 'improved' suddenly.
They're also talking about this "top to bottom anchoring (TBA)" which "caps the amount any club can spend as a multiple of the income earned by the league's bottom side", so £140mill (2023-24 season) x 3 say, gives us £420mill max to spend on transfers, wages & agent fees which would hamper the top 6 clubs but of course the rest (including Newcastle) couldn't afford that anyway if the 85% applies too. The relegated clubs in 2023-24 would have had just a £120mill spend limit.
I can't see how any of this helps to "level out the playing field", I think football is fucked no matter how you look at it.