IrishBlueSince92
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Sep 2016
- Messages
- 3,928
RMIAC??This is the real version
RMIAC??This is the real version
It was going to anyway but this firmly cements the threads place in the Classics forum when it finally gets resolved in 20 years time.It was a real reply, screen captured and unedited.
Masters.RMIAC??
It was a real reply, screen captured and unedited.
That's his chambers phone number which is widely available anyway& his phone number…. If he loses he’s gonna get some abuse I tell ya ;)
Neutral, fact is that its a severely complicated case and we just need to let things play out. On here there is obviously a very pro-city narrative but it is cruicial that we avoid turning BM into an echo chamber. Very few know the intricacies of the case, the legal arguments that both parties will front etc, least of all the people on here.What are everyone's confidence levels? Mine have decreased recently to be honest. Need to some more lovely soft signals.
Richard Masters Is A ****RMIAC??
It was going to anyway but this firmly cements the threads place in the Classics forum when it finally gets resolved in 20 years time.
There's probably more chance that a story comes out that the decision isn't expected to the end of the season now, than we hear anything in the next few weeks
No chance a lawyer would lie in an email. He didn’t even have to reply. Very frustrating for fans though.Assuming Pannick is being sincere, and there's no reason to believe otherwise, then it seems unlikely that we'll be getting a verdict this week.
Sent the poster a bill for £500 for replying.No chance a lawyer would lie in an email. He didn’t even have to reply. Very frustrating for fans though.
It makes you wonder if Pannick has been sitting in his chambers reading this thread and thinking “if someone bothered to email me I could tell them we haven’t had a verdict yet”
Or maybe Paladin is Pannick. Nothing would surprise me anymore.
Is it normal, even permitted, etiquette for a KC to respond to a random member of the public regarding the status of a case?
@slbsn
@gordondaviesmoustache
I don’t believe the email was from our KC. Why was it addressed “to you” instead of an email address
Contrary to Core Duty 2, 3, 5 and 6 for sure and possibly 1 and 10 too.
Professional courtesy perhaps given Paladin’s line of work.Is it normal, even permitted, etiquette for a KC to respond to a random member of the public regarding the status of a case?
@slbsn
@gordondaviesmoustache
Thanks for that, Columbo.I don’t believe the email was from our KC