And won't do until there is a verdict in our favour.I know where your coming from but I want our acheivements to be admired by all, not sullied.
I want others to remember the Pep era as a great pure football acheivement and I want to look back with pride. I can't do that currently.
We lost all admiration from other fans as soon as the charges landed and we've, the club, done nothing to arrest back control of the situation since then.
City took a hit with UEFA in 2014 we won't be making that mistake again.I don't feel I need to. That wasn't the point of my post. I was just pointing out that in the real world businesses (and that's what both City and the PL are at the end of the day) try to figure out what's best for their own continuity and come to an agreement so that both parties move on. What happens when the office nutcase tries to claim unfair dismissal? More often than not a deal is cut behind the scenes to avoid lengthy legal proceedings and bad PR making its way to that company's client and prospect base. City getting slammed isn't a good outcome for City but it's also a terrible outcome for the PL which is why I think it's the least likely outcome.
Never got over Uwe's grandad bombing their chippyHow bad was Stan Boardman?
If The PL had wanted to avoid lengthy legal proceedings they’re going about it in a very strange way. They may well be keen to extricate themselves now but it’s too late for anything other than an admission of failure on their partI don't feel I need to. That wasn't the point of my post. I was just pointing out that in the real world businesses (and that's what both City and the PL are at the end of the day) try to figure out what's best for their own continuity and come to an agreement so that both parties move on. What happens when the office nutcase tries to claim unfair dismissal? More often than not a deal is cut behind the scenes to avoid lengthy legal proceedings and bad PR making its way to that company's client and prospect base. City getting slammed isn't a good outcome for City but it's also a terrible outcome for the PL which is why I think it's the least likely outcome.
So the PL can make baseless accusations about any team and then argue for a deal? Pretty sure that’s mafia tactics. The PL have slit their own throats with this, whatever happens.I don't feel I need to. That wasn't the point of my post. I was just pointing out that in the real world businesses (and that's what both City and the PL are at the end of the day) try to figure out what's best for their own continuity and come to an agreement so that both parties move on. What happens when the office nutcase tries to claim unfair dismissal? More often than not a deal is cut behind the scenes to avoid lengthy legal proceedings and bad PR making its way to that company's client and prospect base. City getting slammed isn't a good outcome for City but it's also a terrible outcome for the PL which is why I think it's the least likely outcome.
In fairness he did caveat early on by saying he was watching AFTV - in this instance I believe it just a harmless wind up attempt than malicious ;)And... there it is, the mask has slipped.
You did well to keep up appearances for so long.
For the record, City were found innocent by CAS. If you are found guilty of something, and a higher court decides that was the wrong verdict, you are cleared, you don't stay guilty. And anyone that tries to pretend otherwise is a bitter twat. Through that little twist, your agenda is pretty fucking clear.
You will no doubt stick about like an obsessive weirdo, but you are not fooling that many any more.
In my original post I stated that Arsenal weren't exactly whiter than white and that there are skeletons in the closet.There will be no deal as it will allow people to carry on the smear campaign, which we have endured for the last 10 years.
The Cas ruling cleared City of all chargeses except the non cooperation one.
The ruling from that committee, stated there was no evidence of any wrong doing on any of the chargeses brought up by UEFA and that included the one that were time barred.
You and the media have chosen to ignore that ruling as it does not suit your agenda.
Instead of coming on here pontificating, go and read the Cas ruling and count the times the words " no evidence was found "
When you get to double figures, let that sink in and reflect that you might just be wrong in your assumptions.
And whilst you are still here,what are your views on your club being sponsored by the Emirates organisation and your view's on your clubs, Rwanda agreement and how did you feel about Mr Usminov owning a stake in your club ?
Or the gentleman who's wealth was founded on exploiting cheap labour in Africa ?
Oh come on! Another chance to hear how poooower he was as a kid. Hilarious annectdotes. Best since Stan Boardman. Side splitting.
The point of your post was telling us the most likely outcome. Explain WHY you think that. Surely?I don't feel I need to. That wasn't the point of my post. I was just pointing out that in the real world businesses (and that's what both City and the PL are at the end of the day) try to figure out what's best for their own continuity and come to an agreement so that both parties move on. What happens when the office nutcase tries to claim unfair dismissal? More often than not a deal is cut behind the scenes to avoid lengthy legal proceedings and bad PR making its way to that company's client and prospect base. City getting slammed isn't a good outcome for City but it's also a terrible outcome for the PL which is why I think it's the least likely outcome.