PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Earlyriser said:
Given your late joining of the discussion I can only assume given your concern for my sleeping habits that you have just got out of bed. That might explain the typing errors in your post.
The differences between slbsn and I stem from the fact that he/she utilises the letter of the law in his/her responses and therefore I might assume he/she has a legal background. I do not but firmly believe that the law can be bent to suit the occasion. I'm not sure anybody concerned with the law would admit that in a public forum.
Within their argument they continually point out that this or that is not relevant to the City case and dismiss whether pressure might be brought by a Govt on such a matter. I pointed out The Chinese Spy case which again was dismissed. Others in the legal profession also question the decision.
My view is that the case has sensitivities which are also reflected in the 115 charges. Either I am silly which I can live or slbsnis is somewhat pedantic.
Click to expand...
Hahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
I`m late joining the discussion !!! Fucking hell you`ve been on this forum for five minutes and you think you`ve grasped everything.
If I was you (thank fuck I`m not by the way) then maybe start to read from Page 1 of this thread, catch up ... and then come back after learning quite a bit more about the case from people who are far more versed than yourself who comes over as nothing more than cockwomble.
Tell you what though ! I wont sleep tonight worrying about my typing errors yet again no doubt.
 
supercity88 said:
Apologies if I've missed it but @slbsn, as it's an international break have you been invited onto TS to provide no update of your own?

^I don't mean the above to sound disrespectful by the way. It's a slow news week so seems logical there's an attempt to get some updates on the charges, even if there aren't any!
Click to expand...
Saying you don't mean to sound disrespectful.
Shows you know it was ?
 
oakiecokie said:
Hahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
I`m late joining the discussion !!! Fucking hell you`ve been on this forum for five minutes and you think you`ve grasped everything.
If I was you (thank fuck I`m not by the way) then maybe start to read from Page 1 of this thread, catch up ... and then come back after learning quite a bit more about the case from people who are far more versed than yourself who comes over as nothing more than cockwomble.
Tell you what though ! I wont sleep tonight worrying about my typing errors yet again no doubt.
Click to expand...
Hahahaa.
 
oakiecokie said:
Hahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
I`m late joining the discussion !!! Fucking hell you`ve been on this forum for five minutes and you think you`ve grasped everything.
If I was you (thank fuck I`m not by the way) then maybe start to read from Page 1 of this thread, catch up ... and then come back after learning quite a bit more about the case from people who are far more versed than yourself who comes over as nothing more than cockwomble.
Tell you what though ! I wont sleep tonight worrying about my typing errors yet again no doubt.
Click to expand...
It might come as a surprise to you that this is not the only source on discussion/information on this topic. It has also substantially moved on in the last 2 years. Your post adds nothing to the discussion other than to demonstrate your limited powers of expression and an ability to engage in personal insults.
 
Earlyriser said:
Given your late joining of the discussion I can only assume given your concern for my sleeping habits that you have just got out of bed. That might explain the typing errors in your post.
The differences between slbsn and I stem from the fact that he/she utilises the letter of the law in his/her responses and therefore I might assume he/she has a legal background. I do not but firmly believe that the law can be bent to suit the occasion. I'm not sure anybody concerned with the law would admit that in a public forum.
Within their argument they continually point out that this or that is not relevant to the City case and dismiss whether pressure might be brought by a Govt on such a matter. I pointed out The Chinese Spy case which again was dismissed. Others in the legal profession also question the decision.
My view is that the case has sensitivities which are also reflected in the 115 charges. Either I am silly which I can live or slbsnis is somewhat pedantic.
Click to expand...
Is Stefan a girl? what the fuck is going on anymore
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top