Cricket Thread

Blue_Lightsaber said:
Oh and isn't ODI now using 2 balls.. so when you think the ball has wear in the ending overs, it's only 20+ overs of weardown, not 45+ as you used to get.
Click to expand...
Yep, but now only until the 34th over, then the fielding side pick which one of the two they want to use for the last 16 overs.

ODIs are getting too contrived these days.
 
Alan Harper's Tash said:
Yep, but now only until the 34th over, then the fielding side pick which one of the two they want to use for the last 16 overs.

ODIs are getting too contrived these days.
Click to expand...

Wow I didn't know that.

Alan Harper's Tash said:
It’s not just India though. The Aussies got away with it against Pakistani and England did vs Bangladesh.

Definitely liking the pace only at the start idea.
Click to expand...

I really rate Darcie Brown as a bowler and I was perplexed why she was not being used.

Maybe the Aussies realized the situation faster than we did.

They do have Gardner, King and Wareham.
 
dadnlad said:
games getting worse with power plays , fielding restrictions and over rate penalties
Click to expand...
The over rate penalties are a joke. Having to have an extra fielder inside the circle for 6 balls is hardly going to bother teams.

50 runs per over not bowled in time would focus minds more.
 
dadnlad said:
i went against indian? couldnt believe how many times someone ran on pitch with one thing or another at end of overs
dont show on tv
Click to expand...

Is it those barefooted ladies with brooms?

Think the camera caught them.. might be the unskilled cheap labor ground staff of the day!

I mean you'd think they'd atleast provide uniforms including shoes to the ground staff but they want to cut corners everywhere. Doesn't look flattering for the ICC one bit although pretty sure they're swimming in profits!
 
Blue_Lightsaber said:
Is it those barefooted ladies with brooms?

Think the camera caught them.. might be the unskilled cheap labor ground staff of the day!

I mean you'd think they'd atleast provide uniforms including shoes to the ground staff but they want to cut corners everywhere. Doesn't look flattering for the ICC one bit although pretty sure they're swimming in profits!
Click to expand...
i ve only watch 1 england game this world cup
are u sure you had cricket channel on lol
 
dadnlad said:
i ve only watch 1 england game this world cup
are u sure you had cricket channel on lol
Click to expand...

Was watching Willow today for the IND vs SA game.

The cameras caught some barefooted women coming on the ground every over.

Nothing insidious like stalkers or rabid fans trying to get selfies with the players.
 
BTW speaking of England.. do you agree with the decision to drop Cross for the World Cup??

I found that one perplexing.
 
Alan Harper's Tash said:
Whilst it’s a supreme spell, playing women’s cricket on slow, low wickets should be illegal.

They can’t get the ball off the square.
Click to expand...
Nonsense, the bowling has been excellent, and did you see Sciver Brunt’s innings. It takes something to demean a bowling spell like that, against two batters who were getting off the ball with ease
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top