PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

asahartford1 said:
If there were no train timetables, you might be waiting a long time on the platform, but you couldn't complain that your train was delayed.
Click to expand...
If it was 12.00 and you knew trains to Manchester typically took 2.5 hours to get to Manchester, the train would be delayed if it was already 3 hours and the train was stuck in Wilmslow.
 
slbsn said:
If it was 12.00 and you knew trains to Manchester typically took 2.5 hours to get to Manchester, the train would be delayed if it was already 3 hours and the train was stuck in Wilmslow.
Click to expand...

Depends on the frequency of trains.
If there was only one train a day, and as I stated there was no timetable, how could I know it was delayed until the time ticked to 12.01 am.-;)
Trains is trains and lawyers, are paid by the quarter hour-:)
 
asahartford1 said:
Depends on the frequency of trains.
If there was only one train a day, and as I stated there was no timetable, how could I know it was delayed until the time ticked to 12.01 am.-;)
Trains is trains and lawyers, are paid by the quarter hour-:)
Click to expand...
We know when the train left
 
slbsn said:
People can repeat mantras like we don't know whether it is late etc. But the reality is that the senior lawyers in the case expected to have heard by now. It is not even a particular secret. And you don't even need to believe me, it is hinted in multiple articles from other people.
Click to expand...

And I do believe you.
 
By the way, "delayed" is the wrong terminology. It is simply taking longer than expected for reasons that are unknown (but not because of behind the scenes diplomacy).
 
slbsn said:
We know when the train left
Click to expand...

True if there are electronic timetables on the platform.
But in my analogy there are no timetables.
Just a certainty that there will be a train, and a decision.

Regards the 115 ish, personally as I have said before I think they have dug a large hole, now they are considering how to get out of it.
 
asahartford1 said:
True if there are electronic timetables on the platform.
But in my analogy there are no timetables.
Just a certainty that there will be a train, and a decision.

Regards the 115 ish, personally as I have said before I think they have dug a large hole, now they are considering how to get out of it.
Click to expand...
But even City's key people don't think this. It is all just quite vanilla - there has been a long hearing and we all await the decision. Nothing more.
 
asahartford1 said:
True if there are electronic timetables on the platform.
But in my analogy there are no timetables.
Just a certainty that there will be a train, and a decision.

Regards the 115 ish, personally as I have said before I think they have dug a large hole, now they are considering how to get out of it.
Click to expand...
Rather the big hole gets filled first
 
TShed said:
Posted once before doing so this morning out of continued frustration

But I’m sure the “verdict” ie the testing of all the allegations was completed a long time ago

I’m on a 40/60 opinion that 60% of the time lines have been consumed by negotiation on mitigations to protect the product itself and specifically the potential consequences and collateral ie lawsuits etc

Which in my opinion and evidenced by our behaviour and continued growth for the last two years in particular is a indicator we were proved correct in all our businesses and conduct a long time back

Edited make that 20/80
Click to expand...
My confusion is regarding the job of the Panel.
Mr Masters said it was nothing more to do with the PL and he awaited the decision.
Since then silence so how can the Panel be interested in the impact their legal decision has unless the PL and City are involved?
 
SilverFox2 said:
My confusion is regarding the job of the Panel.
Mr Masters said it was nothing more to do with the PL and he awaited the decision.
Since then silence so how can the Panel be interested in the impact their legal decision has unless the PL and City are involved?
Click to expand...
Probably some kind of censorship non disclosure been legally served on everyone involved
Bet the Panel was discharged ages ago
 
manimanc said:
Timetable?
As in what you see at a train station?

I know that there hasn't been any news about the verdict which he can confirm as there has been nothing in the news, am I right?

Also I'm pretty sure stefan has also said it's imminent and will drop in the last 3 international breaks.

Therefore we are all in the same boat.

Aren't you bored of all the hot air and the fuss and the false predictions?
Click to expand...

He answered the question.

I was referring to the initial decision, then any appeal, then another panel arbitration, then another decisions, then a sanction, then a possible further appeal etc.
It is a timetable(timeleline may be a better description) that the pundits, and media in general do not comprehend.

Stefan has it covered in extensive detail.

I am not paying attention to the predictions, was just trying to get up to speed with the facts.
 
johnny crossan said:
I am of the firm opinion the panel are culpable. They reached their decision long ago (which is undoubtedly in our favour) and this absurd delay in its publication allows further unwarranted reputational damage to be inflicted on the club for no good reason.
Click to expand...
I think you might not be far off the mark there,wouldn’t go as far as saying they are culpable as such,but has pressure been applied to hold up the releasing of the outcome,for a damage limitation exercise to go on behind the scenes,but without City’s knowledge..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top