johnny crossan
Well-Known Member
and perhaps what the actual outcome of SP's request was.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Your striking of a relationship with Pannick encapsulates the entire 115 saga.
In years to come, if someone asks me to explain what happened with 115, I would open with this anecdote.
Bravo Paladin.
Perfection!
Stoned Rose
Well-Known Member
Let’s have it right mate, any Rastaman worth him salt would’ve said “don’t hesitate to contact I”.
;)
pepguardiola'smoustache
Well-Known Member
Slightly corrected that for you :)
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 13,050
It’s all fun & games & then he invoices you for his replies ;)
Stoned Rose
Well-Known Member
My man :)
Maybe Paladin is Khaldoon.
Stoned Rose
Well-Known Member
Khaladin.
bluemonkey71
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 7,570
Oh go on then I’ll bite. Please explain ?
Centurions
Well-Known Member
1. Regardless of if they were or weren't moved, we agreed a settlement purely on failing FFP.
2. Unless your name IS Nicky I did not say that YOU said the case was about sponsorship (or the books in general) ;)
Says who? She was born and raised in Manchester, went to Parrs Wood school in Didsbury. She then went to Holy Cross College in Bury. Her connection to Wigan is she became their MP in 2010 aged 36 yrs old. Of course she would be sympathetic to Wigan Ath, being located within her constituency.
Blueknows
Well-Known Member
The goalpost were moved after we had already submitted our accounts
Mad Eyed Screamer
Moderator
If we did that very little content would appear each day across the whole Forum ;)
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 15,061
Post in thread 'PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules' https://forums.bluemoon-mcfc.co.uk/...aches-of-financial-rules.358514/post-16919378
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 15,061
Fuck myself if I know.
Stoned Rose
Well-Known Member
Vids?
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 15,061
(Much too) simply: the emails are claimed to show Pearce was sending money to Etihad from Mansour to pay for the sponsorship. The words "I" and "we" doing a lot of heavy lifting in those emails for that point of view. Also supported by some internal presentations describing all AD sponsorships as "shareholder funding", rather foolishly.
The rest of us think the emails are misunderstanding Pearce's role in AD. It is not at all unusual for the EAA to be facilitating payments to state owned entities and Pearce is heavily involved with the EAA. The email quoted, in fact, is from his EAA email account. Personally, I think it's all a misunderstanding of the emails because people are reading them with a very Western, split of duties mentality when business in that part of the world, especially between state and state agencies and their suppliers are much more muddled.
It's a little complicated by Pearce's insistence at CAS that he had never arranged for payments to be made to Etihad (iirc) but the quoted email clearly shows he did. So the usual suspects shout perjury when, it seems to me, the two can be quite easily reconciled.
I don't have any explanation why internal presentations would describe AD sponsorship as shareholder investment, tbh, other than a big mistake that was presumably corrected at some point. But words on presentations do not a cogent case make.
Put simply. And probably wrongly :)
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 15,061
Only for you because you are my favourite. So no-one else ask.
