PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Mad Eyed Screamer said:
Adrian Durham take a bow
Click to expand...
Good point:

“So Wrexham, for example. When the owners of Wrexham came in and injected abnormal amounts of money into a non-league club, where there were no rules down there by the way, they’re seen as cool and heroic, and it’s a great story, and there’s a Hollywood blockbuster ending."

'Interesting' input from the write of the article, though!?

Durham went as far as to list ‘five worse crimes than City’s charges’. As you will soon gather, they are pretty ridiculous and peak with Burnley catching strays simply for being quite sh*t.

“Liverpool raising ticket prices. Chelsea’s owners having no respect for their fans with the way they run the club. Arsenal’s time-wasting tactics killing football entertainment. Burnley’s pathetic effort which they claim is an attempt to stay up every other season. VAR, PGMO should be charged for spoiling the fans’ enjoyment,” Durham added.
 
The Fat el Hombre said:
Good point:

“So Wrexham, for example. When the owners of Wrexham came in and injected abnormal amounts of money into a non-league club, where there were no rules down there by the way, they’re seen as cool and heroic, and it’s a great story, and there’s a Hollywood blockbuster ending."

'Interesting' input from the write of the article, though!?

Durham went as far as to list ‘five worse crimes than City’s charges’. As you will soon gather, they are pretty ridiculous and peak with Burnley catching strays simply for being quite sh*t.

“Liverpool raising ticket prices. Chelsea’s owners having no respect for their fans with the way they run the club. Arsenal’s time-wasting tactics killing football entertainment. Burnley’s pathetic effort which they claim is an attempt to stay up every other season. VAR, PGMO should be charged for spoiling the fans’ enjoyment,” Durham added.
Click to expand...

Whilst good points well made ;)

Durham should have said

Liverpool shirt sponsors are a money laundering bank.
Chelsea guilty of off the book payments and got a ridiculous light fine.
Utd using Red Football ltd books to get around psr.
Arsenal using illegal owner free loans.
 
The Fat el Hombre said:
Good point:

“So Wrexham, for example. When the owners of Wrexham came in and injected abnormal amounts of money into a non-league club, where there were no rules down there by the way, they’re seen as cool and heroic, and it’s a great story, and there’s a Hollywood blockbuster ending."

'Interesting' input from the write of the article, though!?

Durham went as far as to list ‘five worse crimes than City’s charges’. As you will soon gather, they are pretty ridiculous and peak with Burnley catching strays simply for being quite sh*t.

“Liverpool raising ticket prices. Chelsea’s owners having no respect for their fans with the way they run the club. Arsenal’s time-wasting tactics killing football entertainment. Burnley’s pathetic effort which they claim is an attempt to stay up every other season. VAR, PGMO should be charged for spoiling the fans’ enjoyment,” Durham added.
Click to expand...
I can think of a few worse crimes the red cartel have committed.
 
give it to gordon said:
Whilst good points well made ;)

Durham should have said

Liverpool shirt sponsors are a money laundering bank.
Chelsea guilty of off the book payments and got a ridiculous light fine.
Utd using Red Football ltd books to get around psr.
Arsenal using illegal owner free loans.
Click to expand...
+ Liverpool hacking other club's IT systems.
 
Grassland Blue said:
Like "ask the audience" on a studio based quiz show
Click to expand...

Or Gary Lineker on Blockbusters.


HGyGlUSb0AAKDGd
 
If anyone's interested in 3,000 words of analysis on what reasons may lie behind the length of time being taken for the Panel in the PL and MCFC case to issue its judgment, The Lawyer magazine has just published this piece: Where is the Manchester City judgment? Eight possible scenarios

Not able or willing to respond myself to questions on here concerning this article. Maybe someone else will be, but that's up to them.
 
petrusha said:
If anyone's interested in 3,000 words of analysis on what reasons may lie behind the length of time being taken for the Panel in the PL and MCFC case to issue its judgment, The Lawyer magazine has just published this piece: Where is the Manchester City judgment? Eight possible scenarios

Not able or willing to respond myself to questions on here concerning this article. Maybe someone else will be, but that's up to them.
Click to expand...
To sum up this piece, the highest probabilities are that the judges are either still deciding, have been called to other cases which has delayed them (is a similar scenario to the above) or are in discussions about releasing the judgement at the best time (ie end of the season).
 
petrusha said:
If anyone's interested in 3,000 words of analysis on what reasons may lie behind the length of time being taken for the Panel in the PL and MCFC case to issue its judgment, The Lawyer magazine has just published this piece: Where is the Manchester City judgment? Eight possible scenarios

Not able or willing to respond myself to questions on here concerning this article. Maybe someone else will be, but that's up to them.
Click to expand...
I had a quick scan but it doesn't seem to have said any more than has been speculated on here by various people at various times.

TLDR: Nobody knows
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top