Local Elections | Thu 7 May 26

Don’t see anyone blaming immigrants.

I see people who have issues with the policies surrounding immigration.

Big difference but those crying racist and thick know that.

Really? Maybe I imagined this then.


These scenes from the past week in England and Northern Ireland have sparked painful memories among British Asians who remember the 1970s and 80s, when racist violence was widespread and the National Front was on the rise.’


But the ripples of intimidation haven’t yet settled. Some have been left wondering whether they’re really accepted in this country.

“I don’t want to be made to feel like that,” says 20-year-old Muslim Hamza Moriss. “I’m a part of this country as much as they are.”

Meanwhile, Mungra feels a deep sense of unease.

“The last week has made me think that not much has really changed, that racism is still very much alive and we won’t ever actually be seen as the same… not really
.”
 
Nothing at all wrong with controlled legal immigration. We need it and it can be a huge positive for this country.

But immigration control since the late 90s has been terrible and has negatively impacted the country.
I agree with that mate. I also agree with the point made by other posters that we have a Country with an infrastructure for 60 million trying to cope with with 70 million, I well remember that **** George Osborne in some forecast or other planning for a population of 75m - I remember at the time thinking they'd kept that quiet !
Immigration, when properly targeted and planned, is welcome. Our asylum "system" seems a basket case - 110,000 in the last year (24/25 ?) I saw data for - they don't just come on rubber boats.
Arguments are being advanced that we need these people to cope with an aging population etc. and yet Japan has the most aging population in the world and totally rejects this approach - it focuses on technology and robotics etc instead, prioritising the preservation of its culture.
With the coming of AI and robotics do we really need endless population growth ?
If some African who is facing a shit life decides to rock up to the UK do I have a genuine obligation to take him, clothe and feed him and house him ?
These are perfectly reasonable questions to pose and if anyone's answer is "no" - that is a perfectly reasonable position to take and not the hallmark of an extremist,flag-shagging, far-right, fascist, Nazi gammon Hitler - as some would have you believe.
 
The more some people insult other people the more those othered people will vote the way they vote, it's almost a self fulfilling prophecy. The main parties do nothing after all the warnings they have had and are surprised when the people vote against them. Keep calling people stupid you're doing a great job.
 
You fail to mention austerity, but also none of those problems you mention will be solved by our Govt moving further to the right.

Why are all our problems solved by blaming immigrants (many of the politicians responsible for that huge surge are now Reform members/donors/mps) or the poor ('benefit scrounders')?

And I am v sorry to hear about your father.

As db said in his post, billionaire companies paying poverty wages is much more of an issue. Immigration is way down as are small boats.

Your post describes economic and social decay-the rich elites want us to blame the foreigner and the poor not the real culprits of 50 years of neo-liberalism and austerity.
I’m aware of the growing inequality gap between the rich and the working class but we’re definitely suffering from an infrastructure problem that is growing exponentially.

More and more of a non productive population just isn’t helping, wether that’s from illegal immigration or those just taking the piss by not even trying to find work, it’s making a lot of people very unhappy with the way the country has been run by the two mainstream parties. When you see it everyday too many young people out on the streets, people of all ages going into Spoons at 9am or the town where I live, Ashton, waiting to go in the Bowling Green pub, disability scooter parked outside, you just know it’s not good.

There’s plenty of reasons why the above could be challenged, workers on shifts, retired people, genuinely disabled but believe me when you see it daily it’s usually the case of taking the piss.
 
And people hated past immigration, they marched against it and committed acts of violence against people who came here, and that included violence from the Police. The number was never the issue. That they were here at all was the issue.

I mentioned the 70s because I lived through that and remember the violence and the hate. People act is if is a new phenomenon. It isn’t. We’ve seen this film before and no doubt we will see it again in the future.
Never seen anyone mention it as a new phenomenon, it is very very simple this.

Some dont like foreigners or people with different colour faces, arseholes basically
Some may prefer to see the countries culture go in a different direction to others
Some may be worried about strain on public services
Some may be more worried about the increase in population for other reasons like my good self.

So when posters lazily just call people stupid and racist as a whole group its a simplistic argument for morons which is ironic as the dummies are calling others stupid.

The answer? just put 'some people' and maybe don't just keep repeating the same thing over and over again as its all a tad boring.

This is not directed at you as I cant remember if you are one of those, probably not.
 
I agree with that mate. I also agree with the point made by other posters that we have a Country with an infrastructure for 60 million trying to cope with with 70 million, I well remember that **** George Osborne in some forecast or other planning for a population of 75m - I remember at the time thinking they'd kept that quiet !
Immigration, when properly targeted and planned, is welcome. Our asylum "system" seems a basket case - 110,000 in the last year (24/25 ?) I saw data for - they don't just come on rubber boats.
Arguments are being advanced that we need these people to cope with an aging population etc. and yet Japan has the most aging population in the world and totally rejects this approach - it focuses on technology and robotics etc instead, prioritising the preservation of its culture.
With the coming of AI and robotics do we really need endless population growth ?
If some African who is facing a shit life decides to rock up to the UK do I have a genuine obligation to take him, clothe and feed him and house him ?
These are perfectly reasonable questions to pose and if anyone's answer is "no" - that is a perfectly reasonable position to take and not the hallmark of an extremist,flag-shagging, far-right, fascist, Nazi gammon Hitler - as some would have you believe.
'If some African who is facing a shit life decides to rock up to the UK'

perhaps its your choice of language then..or the way you frame it.
 
Hasn't Brum got commissioners running it anyway?

True but I'm not sure how hands on they are? Normally commissioners agree a recovery plan in whatever areas are lacking and then provide oversight back to government to ensure it's happening. Think you still need to have a functioning council with leadership etc? .

Tbh I haven't paid a lot of attention so maybe they are much more hands on than that, they have the powers to be if it's deemed appropriate. Can't remember where it was but I think there was a Tory council down south where they did pretty much ended up running things.

Presumably if the various parties can't agree a stable base for governance which they can then oversee they'll almost certainly intervene further I'd have thought?
 
Stopping out of control population growth that the country cannot sustain and is making the country worse.

Illegal shops like vape shops, desert shops, takeaways (and their takeaway wars), restaurants and their illegal employees, changing the face of our high streets for the worse… and the huge amount of litter seen around these high streets in these areas… is one thing, but there is far more to it than that.

More people = more electricity demand, more water demand, more housing demand, more refuse and waste, more demand on landfill, more recycling demand, more imports, more traffic, more demand on public transport, more pollution, more demand on our greenfield, more demand on our farmland… that we simply cannot keep up with.

I’ve posted this a few times times but most never take it on board, most ignore it, and the few who did respond: one told me I’ve taken it from a far-right article from decades ago (that I’d never heard of because I’m really from a left of centre/social democrat stance) and another just gave me the reply of ‘bollocks’.

I don’t want a growing population in Britain. There are already too many people living on this island. Having a larger population who can pay more tax is far outstripped by many other factors:

With the current population size, the UK barely covers electricity demand in the Winter. Plus, it’s estimated that our current water industry will not be able to cover the demand for water required by the growing population by the 2030s.

Are there any initiatives or investment planned to combat this and keep us serviceable for electricity and water with the surges in immigration and ever increasing population?
And even if there are, will these then have a knock-on effect of increasing pollution which is already a massive problem?

The UK is already struggling to cope with the amount of waste/refuse it has to process. Recycling plants can’t turn around the amount of waste it faces, which leads to much going to landfill when investment in landfill has pretty much ended because successive govts have said that we are going to recycle more. And we are running out of landfill space to the point that we may have no more land to use for waste storage within the next eight years. So where’s the waste going to go with an increased population?

Our current cities are heaving. Traffic and the amount of pollution that comes from it, is at dangerous levels. Greater Manchester has some of the most polluted air in Europe; Nitrogen Dioxide levels from motor vehicles in Greater Manchester already significantly exceed World Health Organisation guidelines. Air pollution contributes to 1,200 annual early deaths in Greater Manchester. 1 in 20 of GtrMcr adult deaths are linked to air pollution.

A growing population through immigration of non-skills-shortage-target-people, means there’s a surplus unskilled workforce. Industries like Tech in Manchester are facing huge shortages in a skilled workforce yet we have hundreds of thousands of people coming into the country who don’t meet these required skills. Too few of the right people are coming into this country. The plan around who comes in is very poor. We have a surplus population of people we don’t need. What we need more than anything is to create skills course qualifications for the current population so that employment balances out properly, not just get more and more people in with the hope that some might be able to cover the skills shortage.

Housing in existing cities is poor and insufficient. There aren’t enough homes and, where homes are vacant, the state of them can be appalling and you wouldn’t use them for keeping farm animals, never mind human families with children. There are too many rogue landlords taking advantage of tenants. There are also instances of double the amount of people living in homes than they are supposed to house in inner-city areas.

Current towns and cities, especially Manchester, feel overpopulated. There’s been a net increased population of Manchester Salford Trafford Stockport Tameside and Oldham who’ve arrived in this country in just the last two years. Yet, there are no new cities being built and existing cities are not increasing at that rate. In existing cities, everywhere is extremely busy all the time. If there were plans to develop places like Carlisle, Dundee, Ipswich, Bangor, Plymouth etc. into 2million population cities with mass house building and infrastructure programmes, fair enough. But there isn’t. The govt aim to build 300,000 new homes a year yet that will still fall short of demand for the population size there is currently, never mind a larger population. Plus, even if there were the right amount of houses being built and available for the growing population, there isn’t the infrastructure to educate, care for, keep healthy and transport all these people around.

Plus even if new cities were built or small cities became big cities, it still wouldn’t help with the need to generate the required electricity and water - and food - demand for more people because it’s not there. And, even if everything was in place for it, pollution would still be made worse so why would we want to do that anyway?

Building new cities and increasing the the size of existing cities means that we would lose green belt land, natural wild habitats, farming land (which has further knock-on effects of not producing enough food for the increasing population and increases of imports which means extra cost and even further pollution), and we would lose parts of our beautiful countryside.

Over 72% of land in England is already farmed land, less than 15% of England is natural wild habitat, with the rest being urban built on or urban parkland. Low wild habitat and low woodland coverage in Britain has lead to poor soil quality and carbon emmisions are not locked away. One-crop farming also leads to poor soil quality and a lack of biodiversity. Soil has degraded and eroded, the quality of the food that we grow and graze on farmland is decreasing and it is a contributor to poor health with lack of nutrients and even a reduction in the quality, size and diversity of the microbiome in our guts, which is one of the most important aspects of health (arguably the most important). Plus, we are taking away the small % of wild habitats we have.

None of this is a good thing and all of it gets worse with a growing population.

An increasing population puts further demand on our already struggling public services.

Crime has significantly increased. A decade ago, the Police in England and Wales recorded around 4m annual crimes committed. There’s been a steady increase in that time and in recent years it’s not been below 6.5m. Population increases will see an increase in crime. Why should people have to put up with that as a side effect of increasing the population? It’s not something people want.

Plus with this, the less likely the general population are to get required help from the Police, because they are too busy with the amount of crime being committed in general.

The UK is one of the most unhealthy countries in Europe (granted, that is mainly due to poor lifestyles and diets). The strain on the NHS is huge, to the point that the NHS cannot cope with a 69m population it has now, never mind how it would cope with an increasing population.

If the growing elderly population is a growing problem now, what will it be like when everyone of working age now gets to to retirement age? They’ll need an even bigger NHS and care service, there’ll need to be an even bigger pension pot. So what then? Just constantly flood the island with more and more people? Constantly putting more and more strain on everything? And house them where? Feed them how? Keep the taps and electricity flowing how? Reduce pollution how? Stop them from contributing to and being a victim of the growing pollution problem how?

There are also far too many issues with an ever polarised and disunited nation with increased immigration. And it seriously is not just an issue with far right bigots, even if the rise of the far-right directly naturally correlates with increased immigration. Every-day, normal, fair-minded people with no extreme views are seeing ever increasing issues with ever increasing immigration.

Many inner-city areas have just become immigrant dumping zones. This sees the existing population feel grievances with the state that these areas become. Small things like some, if not all, the pubs and social clubs shutting in these areas means that social spaces for existing populations decrease or disappear. Pubs and social clubs are often the heartbeat of communities, as places of social communion, sports teams and events. British culture suffers without them and in many places with high immigration, there are no pubs left. The types of businesses in these areas change to cater more for the immigrant population as well; from clothing to food to faith-based sector businesses and charities.

Immigrants being housed in hotels means that the existing local population lose their local place where work meetings, work training, Christmas parties, wakes, birthday parties, school proms, university balls, dance clubs, fitness clubs, wedding receptions, anniversaries, or have people who would visit friends+family for a weekend and need somewhere to stay etc. at these hotels which they were built for and were used for previously, cannot happen anymore. They’ve been taken away from existing communities and their grievances with that mostly have nothing to do with who’s there and nothing to do with being right wing, but simply that another community hub is taken away from the community.

The existing population in these areas, and not just the far-right bigots amongst them, naturally tend to end up relocating from these areas because of accumulations of things like this happening because they don’t like how their local community changes. And you never hear of people wanting to move to these areas. This then creates segregation within our towns and cities, which makes integration into British culture more difficult for concentrated immigrant areas. This is something we should be avoiding as a society but is a natural societal move with increasing immigration.

Another negative that comes from this is that right wing bigots cotton onto it and drive it through as an issue for the whole country which sees the rise in far right sentiment towards immigration. They completely miss all the pertinent negatives to it all and drive it as a cultural issue only. It is a cultural issue but not solely a cultural issue. A knock-on negative that comes from that are then the left wing idiots cotton onto the far right issue, who just do anything to argue and shout down the right wing bigots, start to defend immigration at all costs but - exactly like the far right - also completely miss the pertinent negatives to it all, even purposely ignoring them so they don’t gain any traction in discussion because they cannot have anything the far right agree with being discussed in a wider discussion.

And overall, it just adds to the ever growing polarisation of society.

But the roads are a mess, road networks in cities can’t cope with the amount of vehicles on the roads, transport is a mess, schools can’t offer places for the amount of children there are in the country (300,000 children are not on role at a school), white working class children (especially boys) are being left behind in school performance, wages are kept suppressed, poverty is high, the gap between rich and poor is at an all-time high, pollution is at dangerous levels, the environment is impacted and often cannot be reversed, food is becoming less nutritious, the job market is all over the shop, public services cannot cope, housing is in crisis, crime is ever increasing, social cohesion is collapsing and getting ever more polarised, racial segregation is becoming facet of our communities… all because of an increase in the population and immigration.

There’s no way that there are more positives than negatives to having a larger population and further immigration.

We have the infrastructure in this country for about 60m people. Yet, we’re now at 69m and by the 2040s the current rate of increase would see a 77m population. This is a massive ‘NO!’ for me. We are not ready for it, we are already not coping.

Every single negative aspect to a growing population increases with an ever growing population. Even where people draw positives from a growing population, they can only be maintained and addressed through an even higher growth in population because it’s unsustainable and with that comes all the negatives from an ever growing population.

More people = a worse country on an island like ours.

This doesn’t meant I think people should vote for right wing populist parties. But because the new left call people who think this way ‘racist’ and ‘thick’ and either shout them down or refuse to listen to them, and no left wing party apart from the small Social Democratic Party (who most people have never heard of) are offering solutions to their concerns, I can see why people have turned to right wing populism.

I didn’t vote (again!) the other day, but I can see why people are voting this way.
You talk of the UK and Britain but different areas have different needs. Scotland doesn’t have a population problem — it has a worker-to-retiree problem. Today it’s roughly 3:1; heading toward 2:1. If that continues, it means higher taxes, cuts, or more debt. Birth rates won’t fix this. The only lever that works is sustained migration — about 20–30k net per year — but only if people are working and productive. Dumping population into the wrong places just creates housing pressure in cities while rural areas still decline. Scotland needs more working-age people, properly distributed, not just a bigger headline population.

I suspect many other areas of the UK are similar. The problem is going to get much worse as the UK population ages you don't really cover a solution to that. Particularly where the resources will be needed in the Health, Care, Transport and Hospitality sectors.

And I feel that despite your protestations to the contrary you are falling into the right wing trap of blaming every ill in the UK on uncontrolled migration

Pollution is a problem caused by out of control water companies owned by entities not domiciled in the UK that haven't been properly regulated in years
Police numbers have been radically cut
Pubs are declining for a number of reasons - cost increases to stuff like business rates being one.
Its not the fault of migrants that the roads are in such a state.

Also you don't differentiate between legal and illegal migration. The first is hundreds of thousands, the second tens of thousands. The legal category includes Student visas and Key skill visas (The NHS and Care sectors mainly). Its expected that by imposing a ban on dependents from next year that the current numbers will fall. There is no doubt though that to keep the NHS afloat we will need to continue to augment staffing levels through migration. I'm not dismissing your concerns mate honestly. I just think we need to look far wider for the solution to the problems you outline.
 
Don’t see anyone blaming immigrants.

I see people who have issues with the policies surrounding immigration.

Big difference but those crying racist and thick know that.

I wish that were true. We have friends who are a second generation British Indian couple both hospital consultants. When we first met them about 12 years ago they never used to talk about the racial climate or being subject to racist abuse and now it seems to happen pretty frequently. They've both been told in public to f**k off back home and let's not get into the shit that the one who works in A&E has to hear.

Strikes me there's more than the odd person blaming those who don't look or sound like them whether they're immigrants or not.

Edit: Just realised you might have meant the people debating on here? But then I suppose my question is where is the increase in hate crime coming from if not from we are conducting the debate as a country?
 
Last edited:
Well firstly we need to establish which UK party supposedly has "fascist" policies?

There are none that I'm aware of.

Restore Britain has an education policy that one of Stanley’s pillars predicts.

1778315915077.png
See here:


Stanley’s most recent book is all about this. From the back cover of Erasing History:

1778317149992.jpeg

I wouldn’t disagree with the point that bandying the term ‘fascist’ about all too readily (like Rik from ‘The Young Ones’) may be unhelpful, as most people associate fascism with the horrors of Nazism, though in his earlier book Stanley anticipates this objection, observing that the normalisation of fascist ideology would, by definition, make charges of being fascist seem like an overreaction, even in societies that were transforming along those worrisome lines.

Personally though, I prefer Cas Mudde’s distinction between the radical and extreme right, which is discussed here:


Going back to that Restore policy document, I actually looked at it a while ago. Back then, the penultimate sentence caught my attention:

‘Courses that brainwash students into hating their own culture should be shut down.’

On X I have occasionally invited supporters of Restore Britain who use the term ‘brainwashing’ in their tweets to direct me to the empirical evidence for it. An example might be a test devised by a clinical psychologist or psychiatrist that can distinguish a ‘brainwashed’ student from one who isn’t.

Had a couple of petulant responses but so far nobody has come up with anything.

Over to you.
 
Last edited:
True but I'm not sure how hands on they are? Normally commissioners agree a recovery plan in whatever areas are lacking and then provide oversight back to government to ensure it's happening. Think you still need to have a functioning council with leadership etc? .

Tbh I haven't paid a lot of attention so maybe they are much more hands on than that, they have the powers to be if it's deemed appropriate. Can't remember where it was but I think there was a Tory council down south where they did pretty much ended up running things.

Presumably if the various parties can't agree a stable base for governance which they can then oversee they'll almost certainly intervene further I'd have thought?
I know their legal section has been decimated since they’ve been in special measures. Loads of really good people with years and years of experience have left in the last couple of years (some going into private practice) and it’s now full of locums on far more money who have no real body of knowledge which is so important in a local authority like BCC. Bet that section’s wage bill has gone through the roof and most people in there are useless and can’t make a decision. That section will be never recover from that loss of knowledge and experience.

Special measures has caused huge, long term damage to the council.
 
Brexit has failed.

MAGA has imploded.

The same people who funded these political endevaours are funding Reform.

Reform led councils will fail badly.

Reform majority government would fail badly.

Most people who vote for these things have a lower IQ and can be easily convinced by propaganda on Facebook, X, TikTok and YouTube .

The left will have to wait for the failures of the right because cannot compete with the funding of Billionaires who seek deregulation through the anti immigration and Ethno nationalist proxies.
The old anyone who doesn't vote like I do is thick, sorry that's been played to death.
 
The Ukrainian army is fairly diverse with personnel from Georgia and Belarus, an international brigade with US and UK members and a significant number of Colombians apparently. Interesting fact. The three Soviet armies that marched on Berlin in 1945 were the 1st and 2nd Belarusian Fronts and the 1st Ukrainian Front.

As for the Polish Govt I referenced their Prime Minister Donald Tusk in my first paragraph. Tsk, tsk for not noticing the Tusk reference (see what I did there?). Anywho, I was pleased Tusk won, far better than the previous Govt. His win was the cherry atop the cake (look away now, Theresa May) rather like the ousting of Orban in Hungary by another centre right party.

As for Brexit, two points. We are not rejoining the EU for the foreseeable, if ever. There will be no sweetheart deal on offer akin to what we used to enjoy and it is unlikely that the EU will accept the UK without some cast iron assurances we won’t be playing silly buggers again and that is not on the table. We will be EU adjacent at some point, closer ties, legal agreements yada, yada which will facilitate trade and reduce costs and that’s it. The other point is the US and Trump and the Russian invasion of Ukraine. We literally could not have chosen a worse time to shit the bed with respect to Europe and the pressing need for a European shared defence. Karma is a bitch, but this time it was really taking the piss out of us. As geopolitical blunders go it was up there with Suez.

So, to recap. We are not rejoining the EU. We will enjoy some benefits, but we will not be eating at the main table. Defence and security need to be our primary European focus.

Think that covers it.
Defence of what exactly?
Never have I felt more insecure in the country of my birth.
The UK is fractured, we citizens live in a place of perpetual argument and frustration. All the lies, corruption and people being bribed or bullied into keeping quiet about it.
Why can't everyone just pull together to make it a more pleasant place in which to live?
Who is going to be the person who brings a return to sanity to this nation?
I'm leaning towards Rupert Lowe as it stands.
 
Been away from Tameside for near 30 years but all my family are there and I have moved 4 times within the area, even though being away. It’s not a very inviting area and always seem to shoot themselves in the foot when it comes to the big decisions.

I put it down to the demographics. It’s an area with a lot of aged people and low pay. Industry has gone and the mills that used to support the terrace housing are no longer. The working people are probably pissed off with the situation of huge government cost cutting during the Tories and the affect it’s had on the community.

However, the biggest point comes back to the demographics, where there is a huge populous of older people who were more than happy to vote Brexit as it would never have an effect on their future.

Most of the other demographics were too busy working and thinking about their Friday night out to worry about local elections.
Tameside's age demographic is the same as the rest of the country, people on the main tend to have children they can afford and not sire children they can't afford like the countries got elastic sides. You're are correct about them being workers though it had a huge manufacturing base up until the 1970s when it rapidly went down hill. Labour have had a good run and national issues played a big part but in the main I find the people of Tameside don't lack in common sense.
 
I'm going to be honest with you I know we can't sustain ourselves being independent and i dont want independence, but it's nothing to do with that with people my age and younger it's just a disdain for any English party i dont think they are thinking logically but more emotionally. generally don't know where this disdain has come from.
I agree with you that we could not sustain independence.
As for the rationale in voting for Plaid there is also the fact that a lot of tactical voting went on once the polls predicted a Plaid v Reform battle.
Left of centre voters ditched Labour for Plaid.
 
I know their legal section has been decimated since they’ve been in special measures. Loads of really good people with years and years of experience have left in the last couple of years (some going into private practice) and it’s now full of locums on far more money who have no real body of knowledge which is so important in a local authority like BCC. Bet that section’s wage bill has gone through the roof and most people in there are useless and can’t make a decision. That section will be never recover from that loss of knowledge and experience.

Special measures has caused huge, long term damage to the council.

Not remotely surprised sadly. I suspect the way the locums are accounted for is different from the fixed costs of the existing staff and they'll be able to show a theoretical cost saving when the reality is very different. That's before you get to the impacts of loss of institutional memory and capability.

Edit: I've just had a look at how much the Commissioners cost in daily fees and was staggered to find out that I used to work for one of them. I was staggered in some ways but not in others and let's just leave it at that :-(
 
Last edited:
Really? Maybe I imagined this then.


These scenes from the past week in England and Northern Ireland have sparked painful memories among British Asians who remember the 1970s and 80s, when racist violence was widespread and the National Front was on the rise.’


But the ripples of intimidation haven’t yet settled. Some have been left wondering whether they’re really accepted in this country.

“I don’t want to be made to feel like that,” says 20-year-old Muslim Hamza Moriss. “I’m a part of this country as much as they are.”

Meanwhile, Mungra feels a deep sense of unease.

“The last week has made me think that not much has really changed, that racism is still very much alive and we won’t ever actually be seen as the same… not really
.”

Well done on being consistent and doing exactly what I thought you would do Bob.
 
Defence of what exactly?
Never have I felt more insecure in the country of my birth.
The UK is fractured, we citizens live in a place of perpetual argument and frustration. All the lies, corruption and people being bribed or bullied into keeping quiet about it.
Why can't everyone just pull together to make it a more pleasant place in which to live?
Who is going to be the person who brings a return to sanity to this nation?
I'm leaning towards Rupert Lowe as it stands.

Because people like Rupert Lowe spend their time actively dividing us. For someone like Lowe or Farage to gain power you have to fracture the country. It’s called divide and conquer. Pit one side against the other. The last thing these characters want is everyone ‘pulling together’.

So, do you want everyone to pull together and work to ‘heal the nation’? If so, where do we as a team start?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top