PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Prestwich_Blue said:
If we make an assumption that Lewis & Levy both resigned because of something that came out of our hearing then doesn't that suggest that something has been going on behind the scenes, and that we 'know' the outcome in broad terms?

Let's also assume our discovery process showed that Masters acted under pressure from certain clubs. That they went with just the paper-thin evidence that UEFA had, rather than because they had comprehensive evidence of guilt. That some clubs hadn't acted towards us in the utmost good faith required by PL rules.

I can't imagine we'd stand by and let bygones be bygones. We'd want blood. And I think this is maybe why the outcome has been delayed, to manage the fall-out.
Click to expand...
I suppose though there is also a chance that people who are getting older just retire at some point regardless
 
Scottyboi said:
He's being investigated for historic sex offences is he not?
Click to expand...
Yes,but we might of provided the evidence.
Isn't this how it works, I make something up and spread it across various platforms and it becomes the truth.
I've been watching it happen to us for years,so I thought I'd join in and see how they like it.
 
domalino said:
Those are some absolutely massive assumptions with no evidence behind them.
Click to expand...
They're assumptions, hypotheses, whatever. They state a position that may or may not be correct.

Do you have any facts to suggest they're wrong or have you just made an assumption they aren't?
 
west didsblue said:
With Arsenal, Spurs, West Ham all seeing departures of their top executives it does make you wonder whether it’s more than a coincidence or if it’s rats running for cover.
Click to expand...
I think Sullivan going has nothing to do with it and is far more likely related to those alleged historical sex offences. Levy and Lewis leaving Spurs and Arsenal could well be related to our case though. Levy was named by Pep in his first press conference following the announcement of the charges. No way IMO does Pep lob that grenade in without something to back it up. Lewis has also been an anti-City agitator.
I’m not saying that’s definitely the reason why they jumped ship within weeks of each other but it wouldn’t surprise me.
 
slbsn said:
It is a form of 1.
Click to expand...
So if that's the case & Khaldoon is supremely confident because he knows we "battered the PL" in the hearing, why we're still waiting for the outcome 18 months later? It's a rhetorical question by the way. I know you or anyone else outside the IC doesn't know the answer.

But if either side had "battered" the other, we'd know about it by now.
 
M18CTID said:
I think Sullivan going has nothing to do with it and is far more likely related to those alleged historical sex offences. Levy and Lewis leaving Spurs and Arsenal could well be related to our case though. Levy was named by Pep in his first press conference following the announcement of the charges. No way IMO does Pep lob that grenade in without something to back it up. Lewis has also been an anti-City agitator.
I’m not saying that’s definitely the reason why they jumped ship within weeks of each other but it wouldn’t surprise me.
Click to expand...
Sounds like proof to me.
Good job I’m not a lawyer or a judge.
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
They're assumptions, hypotheses, whatever. They state a position that may or may not be correct.

Do you have any facts to suggest they're wrong or have you just made an assumption they aren't?
Click to expand...

I just think you should be clear when you’re engaging in baseless revenge fantasies because a lot of posters take you seriously.
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
So if that's the case & Khaldoon is supremely confident because he knows we "battered the PL" in the hearing, why we're still waiting for the outcome 18 months later? It's a rhetorical question by the way. I know you or anyone else outside the IC doesn't know the answer.

But if either side had "battered" the other, we'd know about it by now.
Click to expand...
I said a FORM of 1. Not the "battered" bit. The knowledge of what they actually did plus an impression of how the hearing went from the front line.

The case was too technical for certainty or one side being "battered" - which is why we are waiting 19 months on.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top