The_Maverick
Well-Known Member
You think our 2018 bid was totally clean? There's plenty of evidence it wasn't.
Are you referring to to the Jim White article, or the play 3 Lions? Or is there something else I am missing?
You think our 2018 bid was totally clean? There's plenty of evidence it wasn't.
Are you referring to to the Jim White article, or the play 3 Lions? Or is there something else I am missing?
John Oliver, ladies and gentlemen!
Eckert didn't write a report. He inaccurately summarised the Garcia report and appeared to cherry pick a few minor issues with the England and Australia bids whilst appearing to play down major problems with several of the other bids. Of course, this is all conjecture as FIFA won't release the original report.I'm referring to FIFA's ethics judge Hans-Joachim Eckert's report into the 2018 bid process.
He claimed that the English bid "had damaged the integrity of the bidding process and FIFA's reputation".
He specifically cited the FA's attempts to win Jack Warner's support.
The FA knew how the process worked and played by the unwritten rules (winning delegates over by "dubious" methods) but were cheapskates and bad losers.
A comparison would be Dave "the leg" Whelan criticising City for overspending, purely because he couldn't compete on the same scale, having done exactly the same to propel Wigan up the leagues (temporarily ha,ha).
Seen a few of his videos on different subjects, usually very much to the point and funny.
Unfortunately this link seems to be blocked to see outside USA (at least on my PC).
That can't be it. I watched it outside the USA (in India) and it worked fine for me. Maybe watching it is disabled while embedded on any external website. Try the 'watch it on Youtube' option if its available.
Similar message direct on Youtube.
Seems to be that the Uploader has made it not available in my country (England) for whatever reason but has allowed it to be viewed in India seemingly.
Incidentally no probs viewing the earlier FIFA one that Oliver did.
Eckert didn't write a report. He inaccurately summarised the Garcia report and appeared to cherry pick a few minor issues with the England and Australia bids whilst appearing to play down major problems with several of the other bids. Of course, this is all conjecture as FIFA won't release the original report.
Can't wait to see this entire house of cards fall down.
What happens after that is the question! UEFA, and by extension, Platini, will try to/ be expected to lead the rebel 'World Football League' and between Platini and Blatter, I'd rather have Blatter.
According to several journos on Twitter, FIFA have unexpectedly announced a press conference at 5pm UK time.
Wonder who is putting the chairs out.
You seem to be basing your supposition that our bid was corrupt on Eckert's summary of Garcia's report, which according to Garcia had major inaccuracies. Given that the author of the report disputes the summary, how can you come to the conclusion that our bid was corrupt?You can't be half pregnant.
England's bid almost certainly was "less corrupt" in terms of direct payments than Russia's hence the fact that they won.
We certainly had the best technical report and overly relied upon that to win the bid.
We were still corrupt though as were, I image, all the bids for 2018 and 2022 including the ones from the USA and Australia.
FIFA needs reforming, no doubts about that but if you get in bed with the devil you play by his rules.
We knew upfront what was required to win but still bid.