Rename it. Would stop the petty arguments over the terms.
Sod it, I've done it. I know I'll wake up to some grief in the morning, but never mind.
Rename it. Would stop the petty arguments over the terms.
Can't believe you eschewed my suggestion.Sod it, I've done it. I know I'll wake up to some grief in the morning, but never mind.
Good man. That's something I can put my self behind. There's not an agenda. But bias.... Oh yes. Big time.Sod it, I've done it. I know I'll wake up to some grief in the morning, but never mind.
Sod it, I've done it. I know I'll wake up to some grief in the morning, but never mind.
Sod it, I've done it. I know I'll wake up to some grief in the morning, but never mind.
Do you think he has an agenda?you might get grief but you'll be fine, you wont be able to see it as your head will be in the sand.
So 'agenda' is "subjective" and 'bias' isn't? What utter drivel. Have you ever come across a thing called a dictionary? It helps when you don't have a clue what a word means.I think almost everyone is in broad agreement that there is a media bias against City; it's the subjective term "agenda" that some take issue with.
I think it would solve some of the arguments, and be more accurate, if we just renamed this thread "Media bias against City" and carried on from there.
Do you think he has an agenda?
Bluemoon's proprietor is an illiterate mini version of Rupert Murdoch.Perhaps platini works for the media. As does clattenburg ,Walton and Webb. Peter Scudamore and the fixtures panal sending us to Swansea at midday on new years day, all media barons they are.
"Cockroach Cunts"