De Bruyne?

SWP's back said:
You're wrong. But I'll leave it there as despite being told how you are wrong, you're unable to see that you're wrong.

So you can keep repeating your wrongness all you like. But any time you do, I'll just reply with 'wrong' as you're not right.
Click to expand...

He's not wrong though. We've currently paid £44 million, Prudence dictates we have to write it down as the maximum amount we could pay which is £49 million. As far as our accounts are concerned we've paid £49 million for him.
 
pudge said:
Here's £44m.... No deal.

Here's £44m and a possible £5m.... Deal.

I then did not "get" the player for £44m, I "got" him for £49m and I've paid £44m. I have not argued or question how the fee is booked.

Did United get Rooney for £20m or £27m? They got him for deal worth £27m.

Also, Tolmie has maintained the deal was closer to £50m.
Click to expand...

jesus let it go or take it to a dm.
 
ninjamonkey said:
He's not wrong though. We've currently paid £44 million, Prudence dictates we have to write it down as the maximum amount we could pay which is £49 million. As far as our accounts are concerned we've paid £49 million for him.
Click to expand...
I'm not even questioning how it looks in our accounts

It's what the deal is worth; £49m. £1m less than what Liverpool wanted.

That's all, had I not been unneccesarily poked and goaded then it wouldn't have spread to 4/5 posters going off topic discussing something so trivial.
 
Telegraph Football ‏@TeleFootball 2m2 minutes ago
'De Bruyne is a more complete player than Eden Hazard' - worrying for the rest of the EPL... | http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/manchester-city/11832753/Manchester-City-felt-Eden-Hazard-was-too-expensive-at-32m-now-they-are-to-pay-55m-for-Kevin-de-Bruyne.html…

“Everyone knew that De Bruyne was a great talent,” claimed Hans Vanhaezebrouck, De Bruyne’s coach at Genk. “But he is a more complete player than Hazard.
“He has a better understanding of the game. He can play on the left or right, wide or inside.
 
Did the club not warn people against getting Aguero 16 on the back, or was it just rumours that he was changing numbers that put people off?

You'd think the shop might have his shirts all printed up for interviews etc already.
 
BillyShears said:
Haha. Very good. There's defo some members amongst us who like to overstate what we spend and understate what be bring in. Think it makes them feeler closer to the old days chatting shit.
Click to expand...
Stating we spent £44m is overstating it?

Happy deals, twas an even better deal then.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top