De Bruyne?

[80s Shorts]

 

[GaudinoMotors]

It's a contingent liability or asset that needs to be recorded on the BS

 

[BlueDruid]

how is it possible to get so close actually? the 52 alderley road wilmslow hospital is a private one with a boom gate for secret medicals or anything at this place on the back of the hospital isn't it? how did you get there?

As above^^

 

[eversince 76]

I think Merson forgets that we already have a "Pedro" type player on the squad in Navas.......We needed something different and De Bruyne offers more threat in front of goal and has a better final ball......If Paul Merson wants to compare Pedro to anyone, it should be Navas and we didnt need another Navas.....In my opinion...it doesnt matter how good Pedro is or if he is worse or better than De Bruyne......He wasnt the type of player we needed.....De Bruyne is a better system fit and gives us alot more flexibility....

This will only confuse Merson and every other pundit for that matter.

 

[tomadams]

heard he's training with wolfsburg today?;)

 

[BlueDruid]

thanks for the pics mate!;)

No probs - was hoping to get pic of Kev with my 2 sons but had to set off for the game.

 

[Damocles]

He struck a deal to pay £44m now and a possible £5m later.

If he went to Liverpool with a single offer of £44m we wouldn't have signed him. So he didn't "get him" for £6m less than they wanted.

He "got" Sterling for deal worth £49m, we've only had to pay £44m as of now. It can be booked any way you like that was never my point. It's "booked" on Bluemoon as £49m apparently after all.

I'd like to point out that you're now arguing with a financial advisor about financial deals and how they work/are booked.

You got this one wrong, just give it up.

 

[mad4city]

It's a contingent liability or asset that needs to be recorded on the BS

There's no need for that sort of sexually charged language.

 

[pudge]

I'd like to point out that you're now arguing with a financial advisor about financial deals and how they work/are booked.

You got this one wrong, just give it up.

I have not, nor am I arguing how any deal is "booked".

 

[GaudinoMotors]

I'd like to point out that you're now arguing with a financial advisor about financial deals and how they work/are booked.

You got this one wrong, just give it up.

He's not wrong though - neither are you. It' a contingent matter.

 

[Tugay One Cup]

Fuck, I'm jealous of you who live i Manchester

Trust me it's worse when you're stuck in work for match/KDB day. Especially in Ardwick. So near yet so far...

 

[pudge]

He's not wrong though - neither are you. It' a contingent matter.

It's too late, I'm a Txiki basher with a black mark next to my name.

 

[SWP's back]

He struck a deal to pay £44m now and a possible £5m later.

If he went to Liverpool with a single offer of £44m we wouldn't have signed him. So he didn't "get him" for £6m less than they wanted.

He "got" Sterling for deal worth £49m, we've only had to pay £44m as of now. It can be booked any way you like that was never my point. It's "booked" on Bluemoon as £49m apparently after all.

You're wrong. But I'll leave it there as despite being told how you are wrong, you're unable to see that you're wrong.

So you can keep repeating your wrongness all you like. But any time you do, I'll just reply with 'wrong' as you're not right.

 

[80s Shorts]

Has anybody spotted him yet ?

Seen pictures of planes and automobiles but no ginger boy wonder.

 

[SWP's back]

He's not wrong though - neither are you. It' a contingent matter.

@Ric has actually been told it's £44m in total anyway

 

[Bluewonder]

It's a contingent liability that will be included in the accounts as part of the balance sheet, as per the instructions outlined in FRS 12 of the UK Generally Accepted Accounting Practice.

 

[kaz7]

 

[kledippi]

The barriers were up so I drove round and parked up - Simples!

Ah okay...nice!great job!

 

[BlueDejong]

 

[pudge]

You're wrong. But I'll leave it there as despite being told how you are wrong, you're unable to see that you're wrong.

So you can keep repeating your wrongness all you like. But any time you do, I'll just reply with 'wrong' as you're not right.

Here's £44m.... No deal.

Here's £44m and a possible £5m.... Deal.

I then did not "get" the player for £44m, I "got" him for £49m and I've paid £44m. I have not argued or question how the fee is booked.

Did United get Rooney for £20m or £27m? They got him for deal worth £27m.

Also, Tolmie has maintained the deal was closer to £50m.