prestonibbo_mcfc
Well-Known Member
If we did the quadruple we'd struggle to get four players in the team of the year.
2 quadruples ! Now that's just being greedy ;-)
If we did the quadruple we'd struggle to get four players in the team of the year.
Was watching BBC Breakfast the other morning and they were interviewing some Yank, haven't got a clue what they were talking about but the yank just happened to make a comment about ''people coming over and watching a Manchester City soccaar match''... the host, Bill wotisname, couldn't wait to jump in and say 'or utd, or utd'
I wonder if the yank had used utd as his example in the first place if Bill would have been just as keen to get a mention of City in?
Valiant effort mate, but if you thought the IPSO was ever going to do anything other than cover the arses of their chums in the press then you were always going to be disappointed.
I might be completly wrong but when I look at ESPN for example, it seems like we're pretty big in the states? Is it because of NY City or because their general interest in football has been growing a lot since we became one of the top clubs? Any yank on here who knows better?
your post is something that i could've written... in my case i live in America (Ann Arbor, MI) and i am not able to get most of these shows live... what i've noticed also is that very rarely do City supporters call/facebook/tweet the shows... the pundits always spend time on the teams that most listeners call about... so far this year on 606 both Saturday and Sunday regardless of how City does we might get a couple of callers.. even on days that 5live comments on a City game they still don't get enough callers from our supporters in the post match analyses... so they mention us for 2 seconds and on to United to address their audience... (from here the live show is blocked, i can only download the podcast or listen after the match)
also, there is no need for the a media bias against City thread... the post match threads do a fabulous job at that or better yet the Yaya thread... it is as if people listen to the same pundits they love to hate only to regurgitate the same shit they complain about on these forums...
just my little grain of salt for this thread....
Top post mate. Especially the post match thread reference.your post is something that i could've written... in my case i live in America (Ann Arbor, MI) and i am not able to get most of these shows live... what i've noticed also is that very rarely do City supporters call/facebook/tweet the shows... the pundits always spend time on the teams that most listeners call about... so far this year on 606 both Saturday and Sunday regardless of how City does we might get a couple of callers.. even on days that 5live comments on a City game they still don't get enough callers from our supporters in the post match analyses... so they mention us for 2 seconds and on to United to address their audience... (from here the live show is blocked, i can only download the podcast or listen after the match)
also, there is no need for the a media bias against City thread... the post match threads do a fabulous job at that or better yet the Yaya thread... it is as if people listen to the same pundits they love to hate only to regurgitate the same shit they complain about on these forums...
just my little grain of salt for this thread....
![]()
Guardian Team of the Season
Ha ha ha
Mike Keegan & co of the Daily Mail have been on fire today. Their timelines are like a United match day programme.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Exactly. Let them squirm as we succeed.I like the fact the press are so anti City, all we need to do is keep winning, it's like twisting the knife on them.
I love it when you use the word 'squirm', BTP.Exactly. Let them squirm as we succeed.
One of the best and most correct TOTS so far imo. Could argue for Sagna and Kompany but Bellerin and Van Dijk/Smalling have been excellent too.![]()
Guardian Team of the Season
Ha ha ha
What you're doing here is taking a "pro United" story, of which there are many, and conflating it into meaning it's anti City. This is one of the more fundamental nonsenses of this thread. It's surely time for City fans to stop playing the victims and embrace the fact that we're the relatively new kids on the block (in terms of the Premier League) and the lazy journalists, who've been on easy street for years, don't like it. They've cultivated their relationships for years, with no sustained challenge to the status quo, and they're on the defensive. Most of them don't have either the wit or imagination to embrace change (and, to be fair to them, change is not a concept that plays easily to many people) so they spout what they know and what is received wisdom about what the proper order of things is. People can either rail against the media or do what I, and lots of others, do and not give a shit about what 'they' say. This has always worked for me.
One of the best and most correct TOTS so far imo. Could argue for Sagna and Kompany but Bellerin and Van Dijk/Smalling have been excellent too.
Yes I do agree that we're often being overlooked by the media but this time I don't think that we're being treated unfair. Which City player(s) do you think deserves to be in this team?More United players than City. Most goals scored, best goal difference, top of the league and top of the Champions League's 'hardest' group but only one City player?
Just to confirm, not one City player has won a football writers or players player of the year award despite us having the best record over 5 years.
No City manager has won the best manager award. Brendan Fucking Rodgers won it over double winning Pellegrini, with the award then going to 'genius' Mourinho for doing the same thing a year later.
Oh and Aguero has never made the PL team of the season.
This team rarely ever gets the credit it deserves.
Wrong. You're trying too hard to be a smart arse I'm afraid.
No where did I say it was anti City. I'm just providing a example of how positive certain journalists can be to another club.
The main City headlines are about us changing manager, despite Pellegrini being one of the longest serving in the league and having just signed a new contract. Now, I can see why Pep would be linked but it's pushing it with Ancelotti.
Also, it can be sometimes difficult to completely accept the media when they often come out with complete lies about the club. Maybe you just don't have the same attachment so it doesn't bother you as much.
Kompany, Sagna, Kolorov and at a push KDB.Yes I do agree that we're often being overlooked by the media but this time I don't think that we're being treated unfair. Which City player(s) do you think deserves to be in this team?
Edit: Didn't Kompany win POTS 2011/12?
No way Kolarov has been better than Monreal. Monreal has been suberb this season.Kompany, Sagna, Kolorov and at a push KDB.
As has Kolorov. He's actually been in a couple of teams of the year I've seen so far from various journalists/media.No way Kolarov has been better than Monreal. Monreal has been suberb this season.