Forum suggestions and feedback

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
Unfortunately the forum software doesn't do it by default, but you fairly easily quote multiple messages yourself:



Additionally, clicking the white arrow next to the username at the top of the quoted message takes you to the original post.


Ah that video explains it brilliantly but I believe most people right now don't get it
 
One of the recurring themes I get, both in person and by emails/PMs, is that there is too much negativity on the forum, and that some users are too aggressive/confrontational. It's something I'm looking to address, so any feedback on that welcomed too.
There is but we're utterly shite at the moment so of course there's a lot of negativity. The players are all lazy, overpaid, mercenary bastards and the manager's a senile old **** and if you think you're going to stop us saying it then you can think again. And I'll say that to your face you utter prick! But on the whole I think you're right.
 
Ha, smilies are not really for me. Nor are "likes" as such, but there may be other ways to show approval for a post rather than the existing "+1" posts which don't really add anything.

As mentioned though, this post doesn't need to be restricted to technical issues. Feedback on the way the site is administered or moderated are welcome too.

One of the recurring themes I get, both in person and by emails/PMs, is that there is too much negativity on the forum, and that some users are too aggressive/confrontational. It's something I'm looking to address, so any feedback on that welcomed too.

you've said that for about 3 years, it's always been the same. Whilst people continue to take the "well you said x, so that must mean you're a *beep* even though I haven't read or tried to understand the rest of your post" approach, then people are going to get "upset".

That being said, the forum could be more blue. Like the Tweet button at the bottom of the page, that looks nice, the forum should be more like that.
 
What happened to not being able to start a thread unless you have 100 posts? I think that should be brought back.
I also agree with SWP re: the quotes thing. Also, when I hover over the thread title I no longer get a preview of the original post.
 
One of the recurring themes I get, both in person and by emails/PMs, is that there is too much negativity on the forum, and that some users are too aggressive/confrontational. It's something I'm looking to address, so any feedback on that welcomed too.

Any sizeable community full of Men will have this issue. Just be thankful it's based online and not in some Social Club as I'm sure many of us would be dead or in Strangeways right now after some of the bickering that's gone on.

Maybe a newbie/child friendly subforum for Junior Blues... "The North Forum" would be always quiet, the odd groomer will attempt to gain entry but I'm sure ShowRic security can handle it. [emoji6]

But yea it's a community where anyone can voice their opinions, it's a recipe for all kinds of emotions.
If we had just won the Premier League, FA Cup and then the Chumps League everyone would be hugging and kissing on here... Well most people, except some whingebag complaining about the smoke in the South Stand bogs.
The Moderating/Administration seems good to me.
 
We tried that in the past. I put quite a bit of effort in getting it working as well to be fair and people went off their nut and said it ruined the forum, so Ric felt the time wasn't right and removed it.

Not that I'm bitter. You bunch of tossers.

But yeah I'd support its reintroduction.
Me too. So long as it doesn't post it on your Facebook timeline. Don't want me friends knowing I spend half my spare time on here
 
Ha, smilies are not really for me. Nor are "likes" as such, but there may be other ways to show approval for a post rather than the existing "+1" posts which don't really add anything.

As mentioned though, this post doesn't need to be restricted to technical issues. Feedback on the way the site is administered or moderated are welcome too.

One of the recurring themes I get, both in person and by emails/PMs, is that there is too much negativity on the forum, and that some users are too aggressive/confrontational. It's something I'm looking to address, so any feedback on that welcomed too.
Too much negativity in what respect? Towards the team and manager? That's fairly warranted at the moment and I'm usually a very optimistic happy clapper.
 
Too much negativity in what respect? Towards the team and manager? That's fairly warranted at the moment and I'm usually a very optimistic happy clapper.
Fucking damn right it is. @Ric, kindly let them know it's not MumsNet. This is a football forum, a large proportion of the members are male. We are playing shite with an absolute dullard in charge. Of course we won't be sitting round hand-in-hand singing Kumbaya.

@Ric, don't let the vocal minority influence the forum. If we're playing wank, we're playing wank. The forum has been sanitised enough over the years.
 
Of course people are fairly negative about the team at the moment, that's to be expected with the way we are playing. Constructive criticism is fine. The issue is more to do with overreactionary nonsense after a defeat. People calling the manager "an old ****", for instance, doesn't really add to the debate. Maybe negativity was the wrong word. It's more to do with respect, or rather the lack of it, towards the manager, players, and indeed fellow posters. Obviously it's a football forum so there are going to be strong, forthright views. It'd be a pretty dull place if there weren't. We're not trying to sanitise the forum, just want to encourage considered debate rather than users venting their spleen.
 
Of course people are fairly negative about the team at the moment, that's to be expected with the way we are playing. Constructive criticism is fine. The issue is more to do with overreactionary nonsense after a defeat. People calling the manager "an old ****", for instance, doesn't really add to the debate. Maybe negativity was the wrong word. It's more to do with respect, or rather the lack of it, towards the manager, players, and indeed fellow posters. Obviously it's a football forum so there are going to be strong, forthright views. It'd be a pretty dull place if there weren't. We're not trying to sanitise the forum, just want to encourage considered debate rather than users venting their spleen.
Abusing fellow members should of course be an offence which is dealt with by the moderators. I'm not too sure that passing comment on staff or players after constant frustrating performances should be dealt with in the same manner. Surely that would be a bit like Showsec stewards showing three quarters of the Etihad the exit after yet another Bony miss?

It's a football forum where we come to vent with a bit of anonymity so we don't have to do so in front of the missus, family, friends, etc.

There are times for debate, but there are also times to vent. I don't think Manuel should be called this or that X amount of days after a loss, although on the day of the loss/morning after, I can understand why some people might post it.
 
Lack of respect towards the players and managers is the sort of thing you see written by the mods on RAWK and not something I thought I'd see on here.

But it's your forum at the end of the day. If not calling Pellegrini a senile old prick keeps the new members joining up then I can understand why you'd want that to be the case. But the forum has always been a war zone after a loss, we are just seeing more of it now as whilst we used to lose games, we were very rarely outplayed, out thought and out fought week after week.
 
Also, I really would love to be able to make some sort of donation (be it a monthly fee or yearly fee) in order to browse without ads. The ads on this forum can really slow it down at times. I feel guilty doing so however there are times when I enable AdBlock because it's just too slow.

I don't want any badge or note on my profile to say that I'm some sort of paid member. No bells or whistles. Just peace of mind to browse with no ads without feeling guilty.
 
Of course people are fairly negative about the team at the moment, that's to be expected with the way we are playing. Constructive criticism is fine. The issue is more to do with overreactionary nonsense after a defeat. People calling the manager "an old ****", for instance, doesn't really add to the debate. Maybe negativity was the wrong word. It's more to do with respect, or rather the lack of it, towards the manager, players, and indeed fellow posters. Obviously it's a football forum so there are going to be strong, forthright views. It'd be a pretty dull place if there weren't. We're not trying to sanitise the forum, just want to encourage considered debate rather than users venting their spleen.
I'm quite saddened by this post Ric.
 
The sort of posts I'm talking about are things like this, from the post-match thread on Wednesday:

Fuck that! Fuck the old **** off NOW. He is is ruining all the hard work that Mancini did! Absolutely disgraceful once again. Fuck off Manuel!

I don't think things like that add anything to the debate. It's just hysterical nonsense. Slate him for his tactics, or team selection, or inability to motivate the players by all means.
 
The sort of posts I'm talking about are things like this, from the post-match thread on Wednesday:



I don't think things like that add anything to the debate. It's just hysterical nonsense. Slate him for his tactics, or team selection, or inability to motivate the players by all means.

This is going to go down like a lead balloon but what about some kind of swearing filter to block the post being posted? Even if you just tie it into match threads (if technically possible).

It would be immensely unlikely people would vent in the example you have posted without profanity, unless they were proper posh like.

It would also be amusing to see what people could come up with and see the extent of their venting vocabulary.

People love a good deluge of swearing and find it impossible to get their point across without calling someone a **** so I'm sure this idea won't go down very well.

It would get rid of posts you used in your example however.

And everyone calling Manuel a doddery old sponge would amuse me.
 
Abusing fellow members should of course be an offence which is dealt with by the moderators. I'm not too sure that passing comment on staff or players after constant frustrating performances should be dealt with in the same manner. Surely that would be a bit like Showsec stewards showing three quarters of the Etihad the exit after yet another Bony miss?

It's a football forum where we come to vent with a bit of anonymity so we don't have to do so in front of the missus, family, friends, etc.
No one wants to stop people venting but we're getting concerned about the way people interact with each other and the general tone of the forum. It's putting people off who might want to make a more reasoned contribution. There's plenty of anecdotal evidence that posters are put off by the tone on here and that's not healthy as we could potentially end up with a situation where the forum is populated mainly by the people who shout the loudest.
 
That's tosh Colin and this is the usual navalgazing that this forum seems to go through every 18 months.

And a swear filter like 'fecking' red cafe or 'word removed' Villatalk whilst talking of not sanitising the forum.... I think you'd lose far more posters if you child proofed the forum like that.

Simple question, and I'm sure @Damocles will have the answers, is the website traffic down now on 12 months ago? On three years ago? The forum is no different from how it was at any time since I've know it at least.

And if I went off anecdotal evidence of posters being put off posting on here (off topic) and going to join another forum, you'd be right up there as a main culprit if I listened to them, which I don't.
 
Last edited:
No one wants to stop people venting but we're getting concerned about the way people interact with each other and the general tone of the forum. It's putting people off who might want to make a more reasoned contribution. There's plenty of anecdotal evidence that posters are put off by the tone on here and that's not healthy as we could potentially end up with a situation where the forum is populated mainly by the people who shout the loudest.

you've (the mods) always been "getting concerned". It was the same when we had the Cellar, it was the same when we had the likes of GSC and NF being dominating presences and there were plenty of accusations of it being too aggressively blokish and unfriendly to women on here, to the point where off-topic might as well have been an X-Factor/What are you having for dinner exclusive forum because of the "readjustments", until the politics threads were allowed to spiral out of control and the cycle repeated itself. It was the same 6 months ago when newbies whinged because they didn't feel welcomed enough, to which post counts were removed and regular users are now complaining again about other club's fans and newbies getting preferential treatment, as they regularly do. It's the same old cycle and nothing ever changes because sometimes, that's just the way it is.

If people aren't moaning about the stuff on the pitch, they're moaning about people moaning about the stuff on the pitch. People love a moan.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top