Helmet Cole
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Jul 2007
- Messages
- 8,054
I think the milk one is a combo of supermarkets bullying the farmers and dare I say it cheap imports from you know where. ;-)
It's fine we get some magic city growing beans throw them down and voila overnight we would have a new Milton Keynes or Warrington. All the motorways trains hospitals schools so connected to everywhere else and to keep it multicultural like we want, rehouse other settled people in the uk to the new towns to keep the same multicultural demographic as Islington which must be the utopian goal.Ken said we can build on it though and have more people. We can just all eat gravel
It's fine we get some magic city growing beans throw them down and voila overnight we would have a new Milton Keynes or Warrington. All the motorways trains hospitals schools so connected to everywhere else and to keep it multicultural like we want, rehouse other settled people in the uk to the new towns to keep the same multicultural demographic as Islington which must be the utopian goal.
Well I reckon we can build these with magic city beans on the farmers land in at least a week and so it will be fine. Oh and fuck the greedy farmer saying he owns that land who the fuck does he think he is.
The agricultural stuff is a mixed bag – all of the farming unions have come out supporting the remain camp so it can’t be doing that much harm!
Gaudiom M wrote. "The agricultural stuff is a mixed bag – all of the farming unions have come out supporting the remain camp so it can’t be doing that much harm!"
You weren't paying attention a few posts back. The EU paid just under €160 Million to Pro-Remain Groups. So when you hear any of these organisations supporting remain just remember that they are on the payroll. That is not including the 2 million paid to the British Broadcasting Corporation.
International Monetary Fund E168.138
OECD E30,523,562
CBI E1,350,737
--------------------------------------------
National Farmers Union E133,842
--------------------------------------------
Institute for Fiscal Studies E7,400,974
Price Waterhouse Cooper E16,304778
London School of Economics E18,333,273
Standard and Poor E745,158
Royal Society for Protection of Birds E19,630,265
World Wildlife Trust £45,762,505
Friends of the Earth E17,112,870
Trade Union Council E763,473
National Union of Students E767,196
Unite Union E285,788
Communication Workers Union E25,097
GMB E372, 945
Unison E188,893
TOTAL E159,878,761
Why choose a part of a country to compare to a list of sovereign nations?
Why England not the UK? Would it be to show exaggerated data? If you are going to leave out the empty areas of the UK why not do the same for all the other countries?
UKIP received £1.5 million in funding from the EU plus an additional grant of £580k through a "foundation".
Devolution , all the main media groups and Boris Johnson gave received EU funding so they must not be listened too so have no credibility as well as UKIP. It's hilarious just how low Brexit will go with normal everyday things to paint It as some kind of corruption to hoodwink votersYes all political parties in the European Parliament form groups which are then centrally funded. UKIP did think long and hard about this - they could have refused to join a group but that would have left them broke. None of the existing groups were suitable so they formed a new one.
You're way too one dimensional EB2.Devolution , all the main media groups and Boris Johnson gave received EU funding so they must not be listened too so have no credibility as well as UKIP. It's hilarious just how low Brexit will go with normal everyday things to paint It as some kind of corruption to hoodwink voters
The thing is I acknowledge all the items people see as upside for Brexit I just don't see them as upside. I don't see sovereignty as being real and I don't see it bringing better decisions for British people overall. I also see London and the SE acting less in the interest of the rest of the Uk than Europe does . I see us separated from some of the most risky parts of Europe like the euro and having a quite prove ledges position which is probably actually as good as we would achieve out.You're way too one dimensional EB2.
I know I am too but at least I will acknowledge that there are risks with leaving and it is not the panacea, risks like the uncertainty of the economy but I am prepared to ride that risk, things like not knowing or having any assurances that the £8.5bn net contribution will be reinvested in Britains best interest and I accepting there will have to be hard lobbying to make that happen. Once we leave the battle will then only be beginning.
The other arguements are all about opinion which is fair enough but all I see from you is snide, cheap comments about why Brexit is wrong, why can you not promote what benefits remaining will bring!
You claim UKIP have failed to prove themselves, which even you must see as being ridiculous with 4m votes, they are here and you need, from afar, to understand that and get a feel for how this country is feeling right now. How long have you been gone and when did you last visit - I do think you are doing the British public a disservice.
No offence intended here, but I remember we had extended discussion in the Ched Evans thread and again you seemed able to hold a strong principled position which theoretically are fine but which practically are somewhat, well let's say not agrreable to many.
If we do vote to remain in the EU. could we get rid of UKIP representing us over there ? And have a party that actually WANT the EU to work.
You mean like adopt the Euro, join schengen, give Turkey free access, increase our CAP contributions and get Cameron to do a Merkel? Right ho.
Thanks for that.The thing is I acknowledge all the items people see as upside for Brexit I just don't see them as upside. I don't see sovereignty as being real and I don't see it bringing better decisions for British people overall. I also see London and the SE acting less in the interest of the rest of the Uk than Europe does . I see us separated from some of the most risky parts of Europe like the euro and having a quite prove ledges position which is probably actually as good as we would achieve out.
So when I way up all these upsides against the huge downsides that could happen it's a no brainer. I think humanity achieves far more working together than fragmenting and that the European balance sheet is way to weak to take big shocks.
I am one eyed totally , the same way I am about a lot of things -City included. Overall I just hope my big fear of huge damage to the Celtic countries and the north doesn't happen.
I agree the voting system is wrong and labour and the Tories and SNP are massively over represented
Are White British people a minority in Newham?
No. Despite the apparent fear of immigration among some of its residents, and a number of people relocating outside London, White British is still Newham’s largest ethnic group – accounting for 17 per cent of the population.
http://metro.co.uk/2016/05/14/peopl...f-immigrants-bbc-documentary-reveals-5882272/The largest ethnic minority group in the borough is Indian, which makes up just 14 per cent.
White British 17%
White Other 12%
Indian 14%
African 12%
Bangladeshi 12%
Pakistani 10%
Other Asian 6%
Caribbean 5%
Other Black 3%
Others 9%
Anything that the commissioners don't want is ever likely to succeed in the European Parliament. Plus trying to initiate large scale changes in a forum that requires virtual unanimity from 28 member states, especially when you are not part of the inner sanctum makes the likelihood of getting change to be somewhere between no hope and no chance. That I'm afraid the position our country is in, in its present state/role in the EU.No. A party that stands against that and looks to pro actively contribute into making the EU work - I can't see why we have a party that turns its back, doesn't listen, heckles and acts like twats when they could pushing to make reforms better for our nation and the EU.
Anything that the commissioners don't want is ever likely to succeed in the European Parliament. Plus trying to initiate large scale changes in a forum that requires virtual unanimity from 28 member states, especially when you are not part of the inner sanctum makes the likelihood of getting change to be somewhere between no hope and no chance. That I'm afraid the position our country is in, in its present state/role in the EU.