Got to ten minutes... He's a professor of EU studies or something like that and analyses the relationship between the EU and the U.K. and he wants to remain. No suprise there.
He talks about getting things agreed by international mutual agreement. This means Everything is vanilla and diluted does it not?
Then he talks about the big three, the U.K. France and Germany, nothing happens in the EU without the big three agreeing to it.... Really? We don't even get to discuss the huge decisions that involve the Euro upon which the whole EU strategy and decisions are made.
If we leave he will be not required and unnecessary. Far too much self preservation going on here. Maybe it got better in the last 14 minutes but I'm afraid it was so biased it wasn't worth listening to IMO. An example of this was when he went in to describe "facts" from research by the EU into how the EU works with its member states, all came out positive. which would fill a whole library shlef... How big was that shelf? Daft comment for a professor.
Sorry needed to be much more objective for me. I would say the same if anyone from the leave side was audacious enough T to do the same.