Rammy Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 May 2008
- Messages
- 32,061
hahahaIt's relevant you cockend
hahahaIt's relevant you cockend
I think Lino and Mavs have owned this discussion. But that's probably coz I agree with them on principle.
If Pep's system requiresplaying out of the back, and if Joe shows an inability to adapt to this, Shirley bringing in Ter Steegen isn't so ridiculous.
That Joe has been great in the past isn't a legitimate argument.
That you can't believe some want to dump Joe after all he has done, is not a legitimate counterpoint.
That Joe will succeed at playing from the back, isn't opposed to the original position posited.
That poster of the original claim doesn't have proof Joe wouldn't succeed is a red herring. As the claim States 'if he can't.
Anyway, hope Joe improves and keeps his place. But that's coz I like Joe. And I'm not ashamed to say I'm routing for him.
It's very difficult to teach old dogs new tricks. Like it or not, Pep's preferred way of playing isn't going to suit a lot of the players we currently have, on our books.
would it not therefore, be more preferable, until such time as that situation changes, to find a method of playing that suits the players we have, rather than forcing them to play in a system that, the majority of them are clearly, in my view, still very uneasy with.
I completely agree. You're absolutely right. LolI've asked these questions myself. I think it's incredibly complex. I've thought about it and I've settled on the fact that I'm not as smart as Pep so no matter how deep I look into it I'll be wrong.
I completely agree. You're absolutely right. Lol
Let's play like we did last season!We were never going to shift two thirds of this current squad in one transfer window, and It's very difficult to teach old dogs new tricks.
Like it or not, Pep's preferred way of playing isn't going to suit a lot of the older players we currently have, on our books.
would it not therefore, be more preferable, until such time as that situation changes, to find a method of playing that suits the players we have, rather than forcing them to play in a system that, the majority of them are clearly, in my view, still very uneasy with.
That's bullshit. You're implying pellegrini effectively played with our squad properly and are ignoring what George was getting at.Let's play like we did last season!
That's bullshit. You're implying pellegrini effectively played with our squad properly and are ignoring what George was getting at.
**edit you're also ignoring new signings. Cheap post mate.
Have you heard anything about our new manager? There is no way he will sacrifice his principles and way of playing.We were never going to shift two thirds of this current squad in one transfer window, and It's very difficult to teach old dogs new tricks.
Like it or not, Pep's preferred way of playing isn't going to suit a lot of the older players we currently have, on our books.
would it not therefore, be more preferable, until such time as that situation changes, to find a method of playing that suits the players we have, rather than forcing them to play in a system that, the majority of them are clearly, in my view, still very uneasy with.
Joe certainly has the desire to get things moving from the back. He always looks to roll or throw it out if possible. I suspect the rest is a confidence thing. It's widely considered that he is skillful enough with the ball in training etc. but only actually putting it into practice in games will help build that confidence.
And tbh, it's hardly surprising. He's been trained at good old fashioned English clubs by good old fashioned coaches. A bit like Sam Allardyce's comments saying he'd teach Stones how to defend first and foremost. An old fashioned English mentality to certain aspects of the game means they will forever remain in the past.
None of our recent managers have been averse to playing out from the back, but none have shown the vision that Pep does in including the 'keeper as an extra ball playing man or even dropping an even better ball playing midfielder back to help the CBs out.
And if we think of the 'keeper-sweeper tag, it's mainly used for E.g Neuer, Lloris who generally come out to clear danger rather than start the play. (not saying that they don't do that too, but both are renowned for taking the ball off strikers' toes)
Yes, I'm not above the odd cheap post.
I just think it's a nonsense to get the best coach in the world in and then suggest he should compromise his footballing philosophy because our players haven't mastered it in four weeks.
It's the way Pep has worked in the past, and why we brought him in. Look at all the great players he's sacked from his teams over the years because they don't fit into his style of playing. We're trying to become the greatest club in the world. Why settle for less?
Have you heard anything about our new manager? There is no way he will sacrifice his principles and way of playing.
We were never going to shift two thirds of this current squad in one transfer window, and It's very difficult to teach old dogs new tricks.
Like it or not, Pep's preferred way of playing isn't going to suit a lot of the older players we currently have, on our books.
would it not therefore, be more preferable, until such time as that situation changes, to find a method of playing that suits the players we have, rather than forcing them to play in a system that, the majority of them are clearly, in my view, still very uneasy with.
I'm not sure you understand the questions asked. I don't mean that in any harsh way at all. It's a very fair question to ask. It's more of a philosophical question. It's taking it a step further if you will? Why can't the manager evolve to the players? Why do the players have to evolve with him? Shouldn't it be a mix of both? Haven't we paid for these players and aren't they under contract for us?
a) it's been a few weeks. Give them time to adjust before asking Pep to give up on a particular style. Including Hart. He's a top keeper and might be able to adapt.
b) Pep is trying to change tactics because he convinced his tactics are better. Why transition slowly, and let older players stick to bad habits when they will be gone in three years anyway? In which case, why confuse our young players by saying "we'd like you to play like this, but x can't hack it, so we'll play differently until he retires"
C) anyway, Joe Hart. I recon he'll stay and we'll get someone in who can really push him.