Why would Hart go to a mid table club? Behave.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Joe Hart (joined Torino on season long loan - Official)
- Thread starter bugsyblue
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Because they might be the only teams in for him?Why would Hart go to a mid table club? Behave.
Wretched Vengeance
Well-Known Member
Writing is on the wall for Joe after today. Pep obviously doesn't rate him and id go along with that. I Expect to see him playing in a Liverpool shirt in the not too distant future.
If he ends up there I hope he isn't brainwashed into the grief and sorrow, cult bullshit.
I think Liverpool, Arsenal and even Chelsea could go for him. I also think other top Champs league teams would be interested. I'm just amazed by how quick people are to throw the lad under the bus. People stuck up for fucking Bony more than they are doing for Joe.Because they might be the only teams in for him?
hilts
Well-Known Member
Why would Hart go to a mid table club? Behave.
Most of the better teams have more capable or similar level keepers
I don't agree. Those questioning Hart aren't doing so because they think he's shit (which seems to be the case with Bony) bit because they see flaws in his game that are a fundamental part of a Guardiola team.I think Liverpool, Arsenal and even Chelsea could go for him. I also think other top Champs league teams would be interested. I'm just amazed by how quick people are to throw the lad under the bus. People stuck up for fucking Bony more than they are doing for Joe.
Chelsea wouldn't sign him as long as they have Courtois. Liverpool I'm not sure about but Arsenal could be an option. Other than that I think you're looking atbthe like of Everton/West Ham.
franksinatra
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2008
- Messages
- 11,148
No issue with Joe leaving to be honest. He has been a good servant for us but, like at International level, he has suffered from a lack of competition.
We have all wanted Pep and his style of football so we have to accept some of those players who cannot adapt have to be moved in or what is the point in having Pep and his philosophy of play.
It is shame for Joe but I doubt Pep is wanting him to be Zidane on the ball but able to move the ball intelligently and quickly to the back four. The fact that he cannot do this at his age and knowing Pep is on his way reflects badly on him not Pep.
We have all wanted Pep and his style of football so we have to accept some of those players who cannot adapt have to be moved in or what is the point in having Pep and his philosophy of play.
It is shame for Joe but I doubt Pep is wanting him to be Zidane on the ball but able to move the ball intelligently and quickly to the back four. The fact that he cannot do this at his age and knowing Pep is on his way reflects badly on him not Pep.
So Liverpool Arsenal and Chelsea have better keepers? I don't think Tottenham do either. Record number of golden gloves goes in my arguments favour as well but I know you ain't a hart fan so you ain't for turning. I'd replace him if a far superior alternative were available. Neuer and de gea aren't so I'd stick with him. Make him improve but that has to happen with every player. Every player should constantly want to develop and learn from a new coach.Most of the better teams have more capable or similar level keepers
I think Coutois is average but that's just my opinion.I don't agree. Those questioning Hart aren't doing so because they think he's shit (which seems to be the case with Bony) bit because they see flaws in his game that are a fundamental part of a Guardiola team.
Chelsea wouldn't sign him as long as they have Courtois. Liverpool I'm not sure about but Arsenal could be an option. Other than that I think you're looking atbthe like of Everton/West Ham.
You don't think Neur or De Gea woul be an improvement? The golden gloves is a nice award to get but its not always down to exceptional goalkeeping.So Liverpool Arsenal and Chelsea have better keepers? I don't think Tottenham do either. Record number of golden gloves goes in my arguments favour as well but I know you ain't a hart fan so you ain't for turning. I'd replace him if a far superior alternative were available. Neuer and de gea aren't so I'd stick with him. Make him improve but that has to happen with every player. Every player should constantly want to develop and learn from a new coach.
No I said they would be but aren't available.You don't think Neur or De Gea woul be an improvement? The golden gloves is a nice award to get but its not always down to exceptional goalkeeping.
hilts
Well-Known Member
I don't agree. Those questioning Hart aren't doing so because they think he's shit (which seems to be the case with Bony) bit because they see flaws in his game that are a fundamental part of a Guardiola team.
Chelsea wouldn't sign him as long as they have Courtois. Liverpool I'm not sure about but Arsenal could be an option. Other than that I think you're looking atbthe like of Everton/West Ham.
Cech is better than hart, Liverpool have that new guy who I know nothing about, he is better than mignolet though, Leicester, Rags,Spurs,Chelsea all have better keepers
bumbleblue
Well-Known Member
I hope whatever we do regarding the keeper situation we do quickly.
hilts
Well-Known Member
How about Stoke making a bid? Previous manager, decent team being evolving there over the past few seasons, currently playing an old age pensioner in goal.
Plus they like the long ball, winner winner chicken dinner
World class - dog shit
There is a lot in between these two extremes, not rating willy is one thing but admit dog shit was a little extreme
It was used to exemplify the point I am one of the ones who doesn't rate him. Pub talk if you will. I don't think he is up to much at the top level of the game is what I'll conclude with b
My mistake, thought you were saying they wouldn't be.No I said they would be but aren't available.
Hart has 5 years on Cech so that's the only reason I think Hart might be an option. Agree with the rest.Cech is better than hart, Liverpool have that new guy who I know nothing about, he is better than mignolet though, Leicester, Rags,Spurs,Chelsea all have better keepers
W
W
worsleyweb
Guest
Hart has 5 years on Cech so that's the only reason I think Hart might be an option. Agree with the rest.
8 years
You agree an unknown at Liverpool is better than Hart and Schmeical is better than Hart? It's frustrating this thread some of us love Hart, love that he's one of the few English players left in our squad who usually starts, love that he's been here for awhile and always speaks well about the club. Others don't like him and that's not gonna change. There's no real debate going on its just a matter of taste I guess.Hart has 5 years on Cech so that's the only reason I think Hart might be an option. Agree with the rest.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.