Gaylord du Bois
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 30,157
- Location
- Great Umbrage.
- Team supported
- Glory Hunting Blue. Was Chelsea.
Not then he weren't.but was he on 130k a week
Not then he weren't.but was he on 130k a week
Long may it last.have we had no offers for joe, no one is banging the door down with this one does that not raise an eyebrow with the doubters
Nope and nopehave we had no offers for joe, no one is banging the door down with this one does that not raise an eyebrow with the doubters
Long may it last.
Nope and nope
It's very late in the window,just about everyone has their keeper sorted,joe is probably turning down places we don't know about as he has england place to consider and may not want to go abroad,lastly he is a CL keeper and those clubs tend to be sorted,in other words lots for him to consider with little time to do itwhy not then K
Not one eyebrow but two, at your sad attempt at the Joe slaghave we had no offers for joe, no one is banging the door down with this one does that not raise an eyebrow with the doubters
'surplus stock'..........classywell he has to go, we don't want to be sat on surplus stock here, i'd value him around 20 million, just a little strange the big clubs are not fighting over him
Doubters of who Joe? No they are loving it because they are pretending it in any way validates their assertions Hart is not that good.have we had no offers for joe, no one is banging the door down with this one does that not raise an eyebrow with the doubters
Should be 'wasn't' Gaylord.Not then he weren't.
It's very late in the window,just about everyone has their keeper sorted,joe is probably turning dow
Not one eyebrow but two, at your sad attempt at the Joe slag
![]()
Not to the point where we are undermining a decision by Pep.Joe is a blue so long as he is here and deserves respect from us
No-one is doing that,it makes no odds to pep if joe is supported till he goes,he knows it's upset fans but he is used to that with the number of big players he has axed,are you saying we should just turn our backs on joe after 10 yrs?Not to the point where we are undermining a decision by Pep.
Not if you was to read it in the fashion that it were intended, Leonard.Should be 'wasn't' Gaylord.
'Weren't' is only correct when it is used with the 2nd person singular and 1st, 2nd and 3rd person plural subjects.
Strange and insecure.....that was my 1st girlfriends critique of my sexual performance....is that you Stacy?how strange,a very insecure post
LOLNot if you was to read it in the fashion that it were intended, Leonard.
Must try harder.
she was prob your last to but your saying FAStrange and insecure.....that was my 1st girlfriends critique of my sexual performance....is that you Stacy?