European away games ticketing policy

if that's the case with facebook, then they will be able to locate that person and ban them from future purchases surly? especially if they are doing it all the time. a one off ain't too bad.

You'd like to think so, I'm not sure if the club are monitoring it, hopefully they are. I suppose people could message privately to the admin of the page and it wouldn't be as obvious
 
Its interesting that the club statement refers to some clubs insisting on certain security arrangements. I assume one is PSG, not sure which the others are, and how many?

I think the timeline for this has been something like:

1) PSG and French police insisted on Chelsea introducing the system, mainly because of the terrorist situation, partly because of the bad behaviour of some Chelsea fans the previous season.

2) When this system was judged by PSG and French police to have been a success for the Chelsea game, they then insisted that City also abide by it.

3) City introduced the system, possibly seeing it as a one off for the PSG game, possibly seeing it as a trial.

Unfortunately the PSG game well and truly blew the lid off the scale of the selling on of away tickets. This caused two problems for City. Firstly it completely undermined the loyalty points system, especially Platinum and the cup schemes. Secondly it put City clearly in breach of UEFA's rule that the club is in possession the names and addresses of ticket holders. And who wants to give UEFA another stick with which to beat us? Everything since then has been the chaotic administration of an ill thought out system.
 
You'd like to think so, I'm not sure if the club are monitoring it, hopefully they are. I suppose people could message privately to the admin of the page and it wouldn't be as obvious
the club IT experts are to busy having spot the ball contest or name the player behind the fucked up photo to be checking for points whores on Facebook or on these ticket sites
 
Its interesting that the club statement refers to some clubs insisting on certain security arrangements. I assume one is PSG, not sure which the others are, and how many?

I think the timeline for this has been something like:

1) PSG and French police insisted on Chelsea introducing the system, mainly because of the terrorist situation, partly because of the bad behaviour of some Chelsea fans the previous season.

2) When this system was judged by PSG and French police to have been a success for the Chelsea game, they then insisted that City also abide by it.

3) City introduced the system, possibly seeing it as a one off for the PSG game, possibly seeing it as a trial.

Unfortunately the PSG game well and truly blew the lid off the scale of the selling on of away tickets. This caused two problems for City. Firstly it completely undermined the loyalty points system, especially Platinum and the cup schemes. Secondly it put City clearly in breach of UEFA's rule that the club is in possession the names and addresses of ticket holders. And who wants to give UEFA another stick with which to beat us? Everything since then has been the chaotic administration of an ill thought out system.
City had it for Kiev before the psg game
 
for euro aways, why not have city's staff on the turnstile and ask for passport and supporter number to confirm name of person, write it down then check on computor if that person was allocated a ticket for that game, minimal inconvenience and little queuing, just a thought.

That would have been fun at Madrid,I suspect the City staff would have got a twating from the Spanish Police Cowards like most Blues did
 
Its interesting that the club statement refers to some clubs insisting on certain security arrangements. I assume one is PSG, not sure which the others are, and how many?

I think the timeline for this has been something like:

1) PSG and French police insisted on Chelsea introducing the system, mainly because of the terrorist situation, partly because of the bad behaviour of some Chelsea fans the previous season.

2) When this system was judged by PSG and French police to have been a success for the Chelsea game, they then insisted that City also abide by it.

3) City introduced the system, possibly seeing it as a one off for the PSG game, possibly seeing it as a trial.

Unfortunately the PSG game well and truly blew the lid off the scale of the selling on of away tickets. This caused two problems for City. Firstly it completely undermined the loyalty points system, especially Platinum and the cup schemes. Secondly it put City clearly in breach of UEFA's rule that the club is in possession the names and addresses of ticket holders. And who wants to give UEFA another stick with which to beat us? Everything since then has been the chaotic administration of an ill thought out system.
The other clubs are the Italians you had your name wrote on the tickets
 
Points are there to be had, end of. Since points were introduce I spent over 4 years away with the military and the only game miss out on is that lot away. Why now change it ? For an 25 year old who can't go ? I pay a huge mortgage, still work away but to attend city I don't spend stupid money on a pair or jeans or trainers. Nor go to £100 nights in town. I go to as many games as possible. Have I got eventually a ticket not eligible for ? Yes. If you don't qualify but I offer you a ticket for the CL final would you take it? Morals out of he widow!
 
Last edited:
Two seasons ago we trembled in the Roma cauldron hoping for a minor miracle.
Funny because everybody had a chance to go to that game, regardless of how you got a ticket.
 
City had it for Kiev before the psg game

I'd forgotten that. But I still think that the introduction of the system was at least partly initiated by security issues, Kiev & Paris both having "special circumstances". Before the PSG game, City were probably aware that they needed to tighten up procedures to prevent tickets ended up in different hands, but the PSG game really highlighted the extent of the problem.

I also think the potential breach of UEFA's rule requiring clubs to know the name and address of ticket holders for CL games is the main reason why City felt the need to implement the collection system in Glasgow but not Stoke, Swansea or London.
 
That would have been fun at Madrid,I suspect the City staff would have got a twating from the Spanish Police Cowards like most Blues did

They would only have needed to carry out spot checks, one in ten. I expect the Spanish police would have been quite happy to help enforce a further obstacle for City fans.
 
Two seasons ago we trembled in the Roma cauldron hoping for a minor miracle.
Funny because everybody had a chance to go to that game, regardless of how you got a ticket.
Same with Juventus in Turin before the ticket pick up came in, there was points to be had as it didn't sell out.

I also have a feeling we'll struggle to sell out for Barca in a couple of weeks........
 
Got to be honest until last 4 or 5 years never really bothered when we played Santander one of the lads coming with us didn't have a season card so we just waited until they went on open sale and I walked in ticket office bought 4 never bothered with points.Of course we weren't quite as good then.
our worst trip to date.it pissed down and we got beat. only Lisbon can run it close.
 
I'd forgotten that. But I still think that the introduction of the system was at least partly initiated by security issues, Kiev & Paris both having "special circumstances". Before the PSG game, City were probably aware that they needed to tighten up procedures to prevent tickets ended up in different hands, but the PSG game really highlighted the extent of the problem.


I'm sure that City were aware that there was a need to tighten up but as I said it wasn't an option, PSG were keen to ensure that they knew, as far as possible, who was entering their stadium and insisted on it.
 
Sorry mate you sound completely detached from reality. The majority of games you mentioned are glamourous games but the issue there is the cost, taking time off work etc, it supercedes loyalty and that is why even those on the highest points who snap up the Utd, Pool tickets did not fill those seats either.

For a kid he has little chance of catching up with those on 18/20k. Even with all the games you have mentioned he would still not be able to catch up if the high pointers keep cherry picking the United, Stoke, Pool games etc.

It just seems wrong that a whole generation of fans will have little chance of watching a Manchester derby at Old trafford etc. A weighted loyalty points to recent attendance and a small percentage given to ballot would at least give them an outside chance.

It seems a little odd to question his grip on reality just because you've not understood his (valid) point.

The people with the highest points are at every game - they're not cherry picking, and thats why they're on the highest points. There are a few on over 22,000 so yeah, no one will ever catch them but why should they miss out after the effort/sacrifices they've made since the introduction of the points system.

If those on low points went to the unglamorous games often enough then they would work their way up overtime to be able to get to glamorous places like Stoke (I've never thought of it as glamorous myself). The reality is those on lower points can't be arsed any more than the middle rangers that are 'cherry picking', but then still feel entitled to demand that they should be able to go to a big game over someone else more deserving.

Thats bollocks.

If City thought there was an angry reaction to when they put sultanas in the Balti Pies, I dare not think about what will happen if they introduce a ballot for tickets.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top