PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

bobbyowenquiff said:
No chance a lawyer would lie in an email. He didn’t even have to reply. Very frustrating for fans though.
Click to expand...

:) It only says what it says. And it doesn't necessarily say what people are thinking it's saying. Lawyers are experts in saying things in a way that sounds convincing and that can eventually be "proven" to be right, whatever happens.

I'll take the poster's word it's a real reply. It's bizarre, though - the fact he replied, not the content. I have my doubts, though. Whenever he replies to my emails, he calls himself Dave ....
 
halfcenturyup said:
:) It only says what it says. And it doesn't necessarily say what people are thinking it's saying. Lawyers are experts in saying things in a way that sounds convincing and that can eventually be "proven" to be right, whatever happens.

I'll take the poster's word it's a real reply. It's bizarre, though - the fact he replied, not the content. I have my doubts, though. Whenever he replies to my emails, he calls himself Dave ....
Click to expand...

I'd prefer if he called himself Don't. Especially as my initials are KC.
 
halfcenturyup said:
:) It only says what it says. And it doesn't necessarily say what people are thinking it's saying. Lawyers are experts in saying things in a way that sounds convincing and that can eventually be "proven" to be right, whatever happens.

I'll take the poster's word it's a real reply. It's bizarre, though - the fact he replied, not the content. I have my doubts, though. Whenever he replies to my emails, he calls himself Dave ....
Click to expand...

1759839975065.gif
 
Gorton_Tubster said:
I dunno, but it seems to be a consensus on here that they would sit on the results until an international break.
Click to expand...
There's no guarantee of this. The panel themselves will release a decision to the parties (so, not publicly) as soon as it's ready, I think. Basically, the longer the wait, the less there is an argument that the decision should be released at an opportune time (because this becomes more and more outweighed by the need to deliver a decision so that the process can move forward). And now that we've been waiting a while, I think it'll just be released as soon as it's ready.

The club and the PL might then cooperate on timing the release to coincide with a break in the football calendar, although I'm not convinced of this now. For a start, if the club have been substantially cleared, why wouldn't they want that out there ASAP? And anyway, once the parties have the verdict, it'll leak, one way or another. The parties hate each other so it's not clear that there'll be much desire to cooperate here in agreeing a delay to the release, it seems to me.
 
mcfcphil said:
It makes you wonder if Pannick has been sitting in his chambers reading this thread and thinking “if someone bothered to email me I could tell them we haven’t had a verdict yet”

Or maybe Paladin is Pannick. Nothing would surprise me anymore.
Click to expand...
It's not a wind up. It is genuine. And for all the doubters, I am happy to send the email chain of two emails to someone for verification if required.

Anyone familiar with Outlook on Android / Samsung phones will recognise the shortening of the full email address to "You" when viewing incoming emails like this.
 
Braggster said:
There's no guarantee of this. The panel themselves will release a decision to the parties (so, not publicly) as soon as it's ready, I think. Basically, the longer the wait, the less there is an argument that the decision should be released at an opportune time (because this becomes more and more outweighed by the need to deliver a decision so that the process can move forward). And now that we've been waiting a while, I think it'll just be released as soon as it's ready.

The club and the PL might then cooperate on timing the release to coincide with a break in the football calendar, although I'm not convinced of this now. For a start, if the club have been substantially cleared, why wouldn't they want that out there ASAP? And anyway, once the parties have the verdict, it'll leak, one way or another. The parties hate each other so it's not clear that there'll be much desire to cooperate here in agreeing a delay to the release, it seems to me.
Click to expand...
agreed.
 
Paladin said:
It's not a wind up. It is genuine. And for all the doubters, I am happy to send the email chain of two emails to someone for verification if required.

Anyone familiar with Outlook on Android / Samsung phones will recognise the shortening of the full email address to "You" when viewing incoming emails like this.
Click to expand...
given his status,
is it at all possible that he has someone who reads and answers his emails?
and/or are you high enough up the ladder that the said someone would have passed the email on to his lordship?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top