Blue and true
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Feb 2015
- Messages
- 4,934
We're honestly going to be break the internet if we're exonerated. Which is a shame as the reactions will be stupendous.
So by your way of thinking Vester, they will say we are guilty to stop people calling them names on social media???I agree that Khaldoons demeanor is encouraging. And I do truly believe that regardless of what the verdict will eventually be in this case, that the club has done nothing (or at least nothing major) wrong and that this is all coming from mainly US owners doing whatever they can and use all tricks up their sleeve to stop owners like ours from investing in their club rather than stealing from their clubs like themselves.
I'm not just as confident as others here that there is absolutely zero percent chance any of these panel members will feel pressure from the public opinion or has somehow been around football their lives and went into this case without having any opinion at all about the widely spread accusations against us from all directions in the last decade.
Not to mention:
If they provide a guilty verdict, they will get widely celebrated and no one except ourselves will question it.
If they say we are innocent, they will be widely seen as bribed idiots who let "the dirty oil money club and their owners get away with something everyone knows they are guilty of". Or something like that.
You mean it would be unlikely they would be a majority, but not impossible. Bad luck and 2 out of the panel members happens to be 2 out of the 5, 10 or 15 out of a 100 that view the evidence as we are guilty.But 15, 10 or 15 out of 100 wouldn’t be a majority mate. It would mean nothing re the outcome.
Conspiracy what conspiracy…Yes, I agree 1000%. I've said all along and I've been quite aggressive in my comments about this at Goal.com and other sites that we may incur some penalties for an alleged lack of cooperation with this investigation but that we will be fully exonerated on all the substantive charges, and this time, it's full acquittal, since nothing will be time-barred. This was, at best, a PR exercise designed to hamstring our efforts to compete with the Red Cartel, especially with regard to recruitment of both players and coaching staff. The longer this has been drawn out, the greater the damage to the City brand. But now, it's time for a decision, and if we are correct that all this was a bunch of manure dressed up as a legitimate investigation, City will be in an enviable position. In addition, I have to wonder if City will prepare a lawsuit against the PL and even certain member clubs for conspiracy, restraint of trade, and/or other causes of action. If so, it would surely provide an opportunity to utilize legal discovery to subpoena private documents and communications which may provide evidence of criminal wrongdoing.

Yeah but what about the left tit? They tend to look better when they come as a pair.I doubt a man of Khaldoon's stature in the world is setting himself up to look like a right tit.
It beggars the imagination.
This is not Frank from Some Mothers Do Have 'Em. This is a serious, serious player.
By my view of thinking, I think and hope we will be cleared.So by your way of thinking Vester, they will say we are guilty to stop people calling them names on social media???
So you do but you don’t??By my view of thinking, I think and hope we will be cleared.
I do however dont think it's completely implausible that the pressure of public opinion, media or bias could impact these 3 individuals decisions. It has happened plenty of times throughout history.
It isn't that simple when trying to make consensual panel decisions. People believe all sorts, regardless of the evidence in front of them. Even (especially) legal professionals. It isn't over until it's over. My hunch is that it's over thoNot when guilt is binary as it will be in this case. We’ve either breached a rule or we haven’t.
Any panel member coming into this with predetermined opinion regarding the final outcome is extremely unlikely and would be wholly unprofessional.
Any panel member then trying to get the “evidence to fit” that predetermined opinion would be rumbled by the other panel members quicker than Katie Price kneels down and waits for a facial, be booted out and reported to their regulator,
They likely will have formed a preliminary view from the papers (bundle) but that will be based on opinion on what they’ve read and be their “up to here” view, a view which may well wax and wane in the hearing.
The full length of the east standI think you've just written the wording of the first big banner after the release of the verdict.
If he knew straight away post hearing then a tonal change now wouldn't mean much, unless he has new information?I agree. There’s a definite tonal change. He’s obviously supremely confident and I’m sure that is based on his knowledge of the proceedings, not a gut feeling. But that doesn’t mean he can know in the absence of a ruling.
But I think they have to explain their decision as well. They’re gonna look complete nuggets if they can’t give their reasons as to our guilt. So, they look like arseholes if they can’t give a reasoned answer when asked why they found us guilty, or they look like arseholes in the eyes of a load of keyboard warriors if they find us innocent. These, I would hope, are highly educated people so I would like to think they will go with what they believe to be the truth, not with what a load of arseholes WANT them to say??By my view of thinking, I think and hope we will be cleared.
I do however dont think it's completely implausible that the pressure of public opinion, media or bias could impact these 3 individuals decisions. It has happened plenty of times throughout history.
Khaldoon is actually the only person who knows for sure if we are guilty or innocent. If we were guilty we would have settled long ago. He hasn’t seen the ruling yet but he knows what happened.He knows doesnt he , or they havent done anything wrong and there for he is so confident
I think its unlikely but not impossible?So you do but you don’t??
I’ve having a few of those.View attachment 194384
New range coming soon
Never ask a forum, where at least 15%, were former governors, to fill you in!I know who GPC is but somehow missed magic twat's identity.
Care to fill me in?
Where’s Louis Armstrong when you need him?As someone said earlier, Khaldoon chooses his words carefully.
Have a wonderful weekend :)
City won the league with a pedo on the wing
A pedo on the wing
We`re going up ,we`re going down
He could easily take a short term job there and launch the new stadium.Surely if there’s anywhere in the US where Pep would end up is NYCFC?
I have always thought there was a smell round Levy after his partner Joe Lewis was convicted of shares fraud. He must have some skeletons in his closet,Now why would Levy be getting out of football, if true, selling his stake in spurs? Maybe some emails or whatsapp messages have been found implicating him and spurs in skullduggery regards the bringing of the charges againt City and if he is not in football there is very little the PL can do. If the findings were criminal that would be funny. I have said all along Levy and Lewis, of le arse, going roundabout the same time was significant.
Keep the faith blues we will win this.